Comments by "Richard Stuczynski" (@Rjsjrjsjrjsj) on "David Pakman Show" channel.

  1. Chrissy isn't wrong. I'd probably have been more colorful but she's accurate. Frump is one of the LEAST masculine "men" I've ever seen. That includes George Santos.
    82
  2. Yeah. Baffles a lot of us (US) too. I lean heavily on a lot of people were voting AGAINST Hillary not FOR Trump. We got it together in the last election. Keep in mind he NEVER won the popular vote.
    19
  3. Had a former friend like that. She'd hear a 50 cent word and start sprinkling it into conversation. You could tell by context she had no idea what it meant. She was just so desperate to sound educated.
    16
  4. Oh I think we ALL noticed. Seen any Frump rallies recently?
    9
  5.  @lesdavies6846  God, by definition, has been doing a 💩 job for at least 2000 yrs. Might be time to move on.
    6
  6. Maybe Kevin was confusing his own measurements with Dave's. It's always been my experience that the big mouths are projecting. It's kinda sad. I was 5'7" 135lbs once. Maybe lighter. 🙂
    6
  7. Charlie Kirk should, honestly, be a clown. I literally laugh out loud every time I see him. The glasses and tie make it even funnier. It's like "Look at me! I'm a legitimate... 🤡" 🤣 God love ya Chuck. 👍 The way Kari Lake soft lights she might as well just carry around a sheet of frosted glass.
    6
  8. Comer is one of the dopiest looking "men" I've ever seen. Now looks are one thing and that can be mitigated by lucid, cogent interactions... Nope. That looks like a big old "fail" too. Dopey it is. 👍💯
    5
  9. Can't. Bone spurs. 😉
    5
  10. I'm guessing you're orange. 🤔
    4
  11.  @LEM19284  President or laughing stock?
    4
  12. Not true. Seen it. Kinda gross.
    3
  13. The real bottom will be the Frump "sharpie" poll where he just draws a line on a piece of graph paper
    3
  14. I disagree. An actual cat turd can be used as fertilizer. So definitely more useful than the "poll"
    3
  15.  @lesdavies6846  No. I meant to say exactly what I said. There's nothing subjective about it at all. Given what has happened throughout history and even now, the absolute best it's ever been, God, objectively, has done a 💩 job. There are only two reasonable conclusions: God doesn't exist or God is doing a lousy job.
    3
  16. We certainly are because that'd rewrite history. Being 9 yrs ago.
    2
  17.  @brotherandrew3393  Good luck. 👍
    2
  18. There should be a cognitive test for every politician. I mean, LOOK AT 'EM! Too many to mention as examples.
    2
  19. 🤣 Love the title. "Picks nose all alone" Don't we all? Classic. 😁
    2
  20. Dude. That's not a mustache. It wants to be a mustache but it isn't. Thoughty2 had the same problem. He eventually got a real one. Your day will come. 👍
    2
  21. No. Because it's voluntary. Was that not clear? "Involuntarily celibate"
    2
  22. 🤣👍 Spot on. I spend half my time making fun of grammatical or spelling errors.
    2
  23. I always enjoy David's commentary on the tapes but this one got me. Frump: "People give me a lot of credit on foreign policy and the economy..." David: "No they don't" 🤣 Still giggling. So true.
    2
  24. 🤣 Echoing my own thoughts
    2
  25.  @buckiesmalls  "That word you keep using. I do not think it means what you think it means." 😁
    2
  26. I like Joe Walsh's analysis. His take on DeSantis seems spot on. The People's Republic of Florida is NOT the US in general. David on DeSantis: He's smarter than Trump. Uhm, yeah. 🙄 Low bar.
    2
  27. Win!
    2
  28. More guns than people, yes. Because the owners have multiple guns. Some have what could easily be referred to as arsenals. That being said, most of us do NOT own guns. FYI
    2
  29.  @g.hon.4645  I don't know. Frump likes to be the biglyest everything and I'm pretty sure Santos lies more than him. So I could see there being a lot of tension. Personally I'm waiting for the "follow the money" to shake out. Who funded Santos? 🤔
    2
  30. My solution is to limit the weapons you can own to what was available when the amendment was written. 🙂
    2
  31. David. You are correct about DeSantis. And Frump, as usual. What you are NOT correct about is that thing on your upper lip. Now's not the time. Try again when you're a little older. 🪒
    2
  32. 💯
    2
  33. "Ditch pig" Had to look that up on Urban Dictionary Lauren's not fat. If she was mute she'd be datable.
    2
  34.  @MMG-q1v  Agreed but good luck with that. I don't see it happening any time soon. ☹️
    2
  35. Frump sign a loyalty pledge. 🤔 🤣 No f'n way. Loyalty only works in one direction for the big 🍊. I hope they do this. I REALLY hope he starts his own party. THAT would be the ultimate 💩 show. 🤞
    1
  36. I go one better than that. I lie in bed and wait to die. Only consuming air so as not to promote the transportation of goods. 🙂
    1
  37. 🤣 Your tinfoil hat might be a bit too tight there sparky. 😉
    1
  38. Ah c'mon. He's got so many lies to keep straight he's bound to have a hiccup occasionally. Precisely the reason I don't lie. Too much work. I'd rather shovel snow all day.
    1
  39. OMG. O'Reilly looks like 💩. Sounds like 💩 too. Are they looking for a new host for Tales From the Crypt?
    1
  40. My CVS has everything out in the open. Last I was there anyway. Maybe Eric lives in a 💩hole.
    1
  41. You can end that title at the second over. Like every other Trumplican, lying is all they know. I refuse to call any of them Republican. They deserve their own label. MAGA works too.
    1
  42. Are you against mastering English? 🤔
    1
  43.  @brotherandrew3393  Not here to teach. Just asking a question. I'd judge by your response that you're not against mastering it. 🙂
    1
  44. 🙄 You can't make this 💩 up. Unbelievable. Maria, Marco... m0r0ns. It's just sad. Pathetic.
    1
  45. Here's my proposal: Keep the 2nd amendment but only allow weapons that were available when it was written.
    1
  46.  @whyamimrpink78  Sounds good to me. But when was the last time communication killed multiple people? What a ridiculous argument. 🙄
    1
  47.  @whyamimrpink78  It was an insurrection. Attempted. So who died directly from the communication? U 🤡
    1
  48.  @whyamimrpink78  🙄 Still running with that? Conflating misinformation and instigation with communication. Neither one killed anyone. It was the actions taken based on the communication. You're disingenuous and, honestly, not that bright. Go ahead and cling to your argument. Truly, if that's the only thing standing in your way of my proposal then by all means, let's limit communication. Those m0r0ns at the insurrection never would've been able to coordinate if that was the case.
    1
  49.  @whyamimrpink78  Communicate that to your buddies. You skirt everything I write and try to change the conversation. I already said, you want to restrict both amendments to their origin date, great. Let's do it. 👍
    1
  50.  @whyamimrpink78  Oh my lord. 🙄 Read the comments again and see if you can figure it out. Hint: I summarized everything in my last comment. Do they teach reading comprehension where you are?
    1