Comments by "Sebastian Nolte" (@sebastiannolte1201) on "Today I Found Out" channel.

  1. People could travel with 2200 km/h over the Atlantic regularly already in the 1970s. But we have lost the technology for nearly 20 years, and so today we only can travel with less than 1000 km/h. So according to your logic the Concorde never existed?
    3
  2. "Why don't we zip back and forth now.. other tech has evolved seems it would be a breeze " Why do we have to use airplanes that fly with only 900 km/h today, when there was the Concorde in the 1980s that flew 2200 km/h? You think the Concorde was fake? I just don't get that people really think that "We don't do it" means "It is impossible to do it". "The moon is 1/4 the size of earth, why didn't it look bigger than the moon we see from earth, wouldn't it look 4 times the size from the moon. " You really talk about the size of earth and moon from pictures, are you serious? I can take five pictures of the moon and they have all a different size on each picture. Because I can use a zoom.... "Galium3 is there, we'd be mining the shit out of it if we could 'really go"... .2 Do you have any idea about economics? And do you need people to harvest Galium3?
    3
  3. How many people have travelled in a supersonic airliner since 2003? Zero, while the Concorde flew regulary in the 1980s.
    3
  4. So I guess you have sent a probe to the moon, on the same route as the Apollo mission, at the same speed, you measured the radiation dose and come to the result that it is to hight?
    2
  5. My question is, why with technology advancing so fast we have no supersonic passenger airliners since 2003 although we had it in the 1970s?
    1
  6. In Germany there is this thing here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bielefeld_conspiracy I guess you have never been to Bielefeld and don't know anybody who have been there. Does that really mean for you that you consider, that the city doesn't exist? Probably not. And that is fine! You should say that you KNOW that the city exists, and not only that you BELIEVE that it exists. It would be stupid to say, that as long you haven't be in Bielefeld, that the chances are 50/50 that it exists. But conspiracy theorists often have that mindest that you have to see it with your own eyes to know that it is true. Although they don't do it for many other things. They also often switch the burden of proof. I have once seen an extreme example where QAnon people were interviewed on some anti-vax protest. And the interviewer asked, if he can prove that politicians kidnap children and use them for satanic rituals. And the guy really asked back "Can you prove that they don't". LOL! And when we look at the moon landing and compare the official narrative with the "it was fake" narrative and look into each version, then the official narrative just is the one that is more likely and more plausible. That's it. So the burden of proof is on the people who claim that it is fake.
    1
  7. "Transparency! " What do you miss? Everything is well documented, the transparency is there. " It's no surprise NASA hasn't returned to the moon in decades, take a guess why." First of all money. The budget was massively cut. And there people on moon six times, should they just keep on going and going forever? For what? Instead they focused on other stuff. So for example bringing people and stuff into LEO cheap and often, so they developed the Space Shutte. An incredible machine, did 135 flights. It brought up the Hubble telescope, that gave us amazing discoveries about our universe. It built the International Space Station, the biggest man made object in space ever, constantly habitaed for 20 years. And don't forget the incredible unmanned projects. NASA has sent probes to all planets, and some moons and asteroids. We had rovers and a helicopter on Mars. We have clear photos of Pluot, imagine that! The Voyager probes has left the solar system! The James Webb Telescope again shows us more about the universe. Actually all these these unmanned missions are well more worth the money than spending immense amount of money for bringing people to the moon. "Only LOW earth orbit to fill all their pockets with dirty money. " Yes, for human space flight we only were in low earth orbit. So? "Elon Musk apparently wants to go well beyond LEO but it's seems aerospace companies don't want to share NASA taxpayer dollars with Mr. Musk so they try suing Mr. Musk, that didn't work so they pressured the Gov. FAA and Fish-Wildlife to foul up and delay and cost Mr. Musk from running his lawful business, SpaceX. " Wow, have you even any idea about these things? NASA works well together wis SpaceX. SpaceX have the only non-russian vehicle to bring astronauts to the ISS. So the official NASA flights to the ISS are done by SpaceX (who actually have a more or less monopoly meanwhile to bring stuff into orbit). And NASA is working oin going to the moon, the first flight of the Artemis program already was in November 2022, when the orion capsule flew around the moon. The next flight will have the same profile, but with astronauts in it. And they don't have an own lander this time, but need the private companies for that. And SpaceX will deliver the lander. " Corruption runs deep in Government and corporations, " Well, I don't want to disagree on that. However, the Apollo missions were real and people walked on the moon.
    1
  8. What Van Allen belts? So you have sent a probe by yourself up there and so found out that there are regions with higher radiation around the earth? Oh, you didn't? Then how do you know that they are there in the first place? Well, NASA told you so. So you believe them when they tell you, that there are radiation belts around the earth, but you don't believe them, when they tell you that can go through it. Sorry, but that doesn't make any sense.
    1
  9. If the Concorde was real, then why don't we have supersonic airliners today? 🤔
    1