Comments by "Sebastian Nolte" (@sebastiannolte1201) on "Искаженное восприятие" channel.

  1. " did newton write that law about a vacuum or space? No, he wrote it using the variables encountered in the earth environment. " This is ridiculous. You seem to have no idea of how science work. Do you think that magnets work in space? Do you think that electricity work in space? Do you think that F=ma only is working inside the atmosphere? And the main problem with all you people is: What is space for you? What is a vacuum for you? Do you think, that there is a relation between thrust and air pressure, so like "less air = less thrust"? If yes, can you tell me the formula? Or do you think, that there is a threshold, so below the threshold rockets work fine, and above they don't work at all? Then where is the threshold and why? Or do you think, that they just don't work in perfect vacuum? Well, even in space there is not perfect vacuum. - The air pressure at 35.9km is only 1% comparing to the ground. We can fly that high with balloons. You can see rockets that still accelerate with full power at that altitudes - the FAI definition for space is 100km. There iyou have 0.00027% air pressure - The ISS at about 400km loses 50 - 150m of altitude every day because of air drag, so een there you don't have perfect vacuum. So up to which altitude do rockets work and why?
    11
  2. What is a "true vacuum"? So where is the air pressure threshold from where rockets won't producing thrust anymore? And is there a relation between air pressure and thrust (so thinner air - lower thrust; would make sense I think?)
    4
  3. What is a real vacuum?
    1
  4. What is a true vacuum?
    1
  5. Can you tell me at which altitude the near infinite vacuum of space begins?
    1
  6. People like you claim, that rockets need air to push against and don't work in a vacuum. And I just want to know, how high a rocket could fly according to you. Do you think that the thrust is releated to the air pressure (so less air density = less thrust)? That would make sense. But then we have the problem, that already at 35.9 km (not space by any definition) we have only 1% of the air pressure comparing to ground. But we can see that in that altitude rockets still accelerate with full power. Or do you think, that it works well, unless there is no infinite vacuum? Ok, but then we don't have problems to go with rockets to the ISS. At that height (400km), there are still so many air molecules, that the ISS loses 50m-150m altitude each day, because the air drag slows it down. So it must be pushed from time to time.
    1
  7. All you "Rockets cannot work in space" people have one big problem: We don't have just "atmosphere", where the rockets should fine according to you, and the suddenly "the vacuum of space" where it would not work. Instead the air density just becomes thinner and thinner with the altitude. If your "theory" would be correct, don't you think, that the rocket should work worse in thinner air and would have less thrust? The air pressure gets lower very quickly, at the beginning, then slower. At 13km (the maximum altitude for passanger planes) you have 18.9% air pressure. Already 35.9km you have only 1% air pressure! Only 0.16% at 50km. And at 100km you have 0.00027%. The ISS is at about 400km - but there is still no perfect vacuum, so it slows down because of the air drag and loses height. The Hubble was put out at 618km, is now at about 550km, and it keeps on losing height - because of the air drag up there. So please can you tell me: What is the border for a rocket to work, which air pressure is neccessary? Or can you tell me the formula for the relation between thrust and air pressure?
    1
  8. And what you also forget: You think that this is a special "space" thing. But it is not. If reaction engines would work as you think, then that would also affect jet airplanes. Why do you think that they fly so high? Speed records were made at a very high altitude - because you have less air drag there. But still the same thrust. Do you think that e.g. the engineers at Rolls-Royce, who jet engines fpr most passanger planes, don't know how they own engines work or are parte of the conspiracy?
    1
  9. can you tell me at which altitude the infinite vacuum of space begins?
    1
  10. So you think as long as a vacuum is not infinite, rockets work?
    1
  11. Then where is the threshold, how much air pressure do you need? Or do you think, that the thrust is related to the air pressure? That would makes sense then, but can you tell me the formula for that? The people who actually believe, that reaction engines work by "pushing against something" obviously forget, that already at 36km (that is not space by any definition) the air pressure is only 1% comparing to the ground. Then why do rockets keep on accelrating with full thrust in that altitude? Rockets should go slower the higher they get. And why are airplanes so fast even in quite high altitudes? Actually they fly so high because the need less fuel there. And altitude records for jet are also made in quite high altitudes.
    1
  12. Do you think that the thrust collerate with the air pressure, so less air, less thrust? Or do you just think, that there is one threshold of air pressure level, and if you go under it, there is suddenly zero thrust? At which air pressure is this level, and why?
    1
  13. So you think "some air" is enough for a rocket to work?
    1
  14. Well, I also don't think that this experiment is accurate. But th problem is, that the claim "Rockets don't work in a space" is ridiculous and there is no need to do experiments like this. And espacially I often ask to the people who claim this: What do you mean with space? And what do you mean with vacuum? And up to what altitude do rockets work? Yes, there is still some air in there in the experiment. But there is also some air even at 400 km , the orbit of the ISS. The air drag slows the ISS down and it loses 50m to 150m altitude every day.
    1