Comments by "Sebastian Nolte" (@sebastiannolte1201) on "The Wall Street Journal" channel.

  1. At what altitude is the firmament according to the bible?
    2
  2. By your personal definition? As they say in the video: US Airforce definition is 264000 feet
    2
  3. NASA depends on Elon Musk, because at the moment he is the only one who has a vehicle that brings astronauts to the ISS. SpaceX is the market leader at the moment, they had more than 200 Falcon 9 starts. It is so weird, some people don't realize that SpaceX is successfull at the moment with their current Falcon 9 rocket and their Dragon space craft. But now they develop a entirely new vehicle and we can see the development live. Other companies just use calculations and simulations, while SpaceX has chosen instead a way where they quickly build many prototypes and make Trail&Error tests with them.
    1
  4. New Shepard already reached more than 73 miles in a test flight.
    1
  5. 60 years ago a 119 m rocket with 33 Full-flow staged combustion cycle engines launched succesfully? I din't know that!
    1
  6.  @veeivezaj  At what altitude is the firmament?
    1
  7. Why should they film inside of parabolic zero airplane flights? Both ARE basicly just parabolic Zero G airplane flights, just higher. So what is your point? Why do you even think that this is something that has to be fake? And these flights are tourist attractions that you can book. So weird that people get triggered when they read "space", as if it is something special. Let's just ignore the term and don't talk about space. Let's just say what they are: We have vehicles that go straight up, stop the engine, fall down, and so you are weightless inside of them. That's it. It would be the same when they would reach lower altitude that doesn't count as "space".
    1
  8. Are you kidding? You never wondered why the first mission that landed on the moon was called Apollo 11 and not Apollo 1? AS-201: First launch of the Saturn IB rocket, suborbital testflight of the Apollo command module AS-203: first orbital launch of the Saturn IB, without the Apollo spacercaft AS-202: suborbital testflight of the Apollo command module Apollo 1: Should have been the first manned flight, but during tests on the ground a fire break out and all three astronauts died Apollo 4: First launch of the Saturn V, test flight of the Apollo command module, unmanned Apollo 5: testflight of the moon lander in earth's orbit, unmanned Apollo 6: Second unmanned test launch of the Saturn V Apollo 7: first manned launch of the Saturn 1B into earth's orbit Apollo 8: first manned flight around the moon, so without landing Apollo 9: manned test of the moon lander docking maneuver in earth's orbit Apollo 10: manned flight to the moon, test of the moon lander, but without landing Apollo 11: first landing So actually much more testing than Artemis: Artemis 1: First flight around the moon, unmanned Artemis 2: First manned flight around the moon Artemis 3: Landing on the moon.
    1
  9. The next supersonic airliner is not even on the horizon, I don't know if finally a company will build it. Let's say it happen in 2025. Would you ask why it has taken so long to do it again, when the Concorde already flew in the 1970s (until 2003)? Do you think that is odd?
    1