Comments by "Sebastian Nolte" (@sebastiannolte1201) on "Primal Space" channel.

  1. Because with more power, the battery would be empty even earlier.
    3
  2. But you never undertood them. An now you prefere to blindly believe in Youtube videos that claim, that it is all fake. Of course you don't question those videos and you don't do your own research. The funny thing is: You claim you have woken up.
    2
  3. We always see in the past, because light has a limited speed. When you see something, then the light from that object needs a certain time until it reaches your eyes. Of course light is extremly fast and down here on earth you would never notice it because you look not very far in the past. But the sun already is so far away, that when you watch at it, you see how it looked eight minutes ago.
    2
  4. There was also Apollo 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17
    2
  5. Too far away from the sun.
    2
  6. Where is the firmament so what altitude/distance to earth?
    2
  7. Actually it loses between 50 m and 150 m of altitude per day because of the drag, that "Dark 074" has mentioned.
    2
  8. " I can't even get a decent cell signal at my place either" But you could just buy a satellite phone and can make phone calls even in the middle of the ocean or the desert. So what is your point?
    2
  9.  @krisvandedialyse5826  I just looked it up, it actually will happen already in 2026. However, I have no idea how Akhtar Ahmed thinks that it is already a dew light years away.
    1
  10. So you better should observe Mars through a proper telescope.
    1
  11. Well, you see how huge they are? They are basically just giant fuel tanks. And still they run out of fuel after a few minutes.
    1
  12. I can see an airplane that is several miles away with my naked eye, but I cannot see a mosqito that is only 50 feet away. So what do you want to say with your comment?
    1
  13.  @ejaydc8198  How does that matter? Are there cameras or telescopes with the capabilty to zoom in infinetly? No. I can change "my naked eye" in my example with "my telescope" and higher numbers for the distances. But also at maximum zoom a big object will still be big and a small object will be small if they are at the same distance. And an object can still be so small, that I cannot see it through the telescope. And even if the smaller object is closer to me than the big object that can be the case. A telescope doesn't let you see further. Instead it makes objects bigger and increases the resolution. I can see the sun with my naked eye although it is 150 million kilometers away. So according to you I would not need binoculars for anything on earth, because I can see objects that are even 150 million kilometers away, then of course I can see ANYTHING that is closer? No matter how small it is? This guys here takes nice pictures of the Andromeda Galaxy with a normale camera lense, so not even a telescope. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tr8KM9tYRJE Andromeda is 2.5 million lightyears away! Does that mean that with the same camera and the same zoom settings, he could take a picture of a book that is 10 miles away and you can read the text? Of course not. High zoom means "high resolution". They say in the video that Hubble has got a resolution of 0.05 arcsec. Feel free to calculate if you should see a flag on the moon with it. BTW there are pictures of the moon taken by Hubble: https://hubblesite.org/contents/media/images/1999/14/796-Image.html?news=true
    1
  14. You always look into the past, all the time, because light needs a certain time until it reaches your eyes. So it has nothing to do with the hubble. Already the sun is so far away, that the light needs eight minutes to reach earth. That means when you watch at the sky you see how the sun looked eight minutes ago. Everything that you see is the past. The further away it is, the further you look into the past. Sound is much slower than light, there you easily notice in your every day life that you "listen into the past". When you see a firework, you hear the "boom" later than you see the firework exploding. When you see people playing football in the distance you will see that somobdy kicks the ball, but you hear it later. But your probably would not call it time travel, just because you hear things later.
    1
  15. "Scientist say the Big bang happened around 5 Billion years ago." Who says that? It was Edward Hubble (so the guy after the telescope was named) who came by meassurements any calculations to an age of the universe of 14.4 billion years already in 1929.. Later it was corrected to 13.7 billion years. That is also the age that I have learned since I was a kid in the 1980s (so before the Hubble telescope) and it was and is in all books. Maybe you mix up the age of the universe with the age of our solar system.
    1
  16. So which mistake do they make when they measure the distance of objects, can you please explain it?
    1
  17. There is no mission. It was the first flight of the falcon heavy, and usually they just put some dummy payload for such a flight, so some brick of concrete or something like that. But Space X used this car, because it is cooler. So no waste of time. And of course no tay payers money. Space X is a private company.
    1
  18. Also the super duper fast spaceship will not be faster then light. So it will take a few million years to get there.
    1
  19. So you write a comment to a video before you have even seen the video?
    1
  20. How should that work? In theory it could be possible to put it in the cargo bay of a Space Shuttle someway. But we don't have the Space Shuttle anymore.
    1
  21. Well, there are pictures of the planets made by Hubble, just google for it. But I am not sure what you expect. I can see the moon with my naked eye, although it is 328,000 km away. But still I cannot read a newspaper that is only 10 m away.
    1
  22. I am not suere if you are joking, but rockets don't make holes in the ozone layer.
    1
  23. You always see in the past, on only with this telescope. And you cannot teleport faster than light :-)
    1
  24. And the landings of Apollo 12, 14,15,16 an 17 were real?
    1
  25. So you don't believe that there are stars that are further away than 6200 light years?
    1