Comments by "Barsukas" (@barsukascool) on "An Open Letter to Prime Minister Keir Starmer (Southport)" video.

TIK, please stop calling the goverment of the UK Fascist. By no definition, neither the classical nor your own, the British goverment is Fascist. You defined Fascism as "National Syndicalism with a philosophy of Actualism". You have commented under your recent community post to a person doubting you "Unions are workers councils. The Local Councils are them. The "corporation" (corpus, body, organs of the state - the council) were set up as unions. They come from the Municipal Corporations Act in the 1830s (although their origins predate this)." You may be describing Syndicalism, but it’s definetly not national and the people in the goverment I doubt are Actualists. Edit: TIK has answered to me in another comment: "They are nationalist (not patriotic) and syndicalist. They're not Actualist, but that's just another Hegelian offshoot, so while they're not full Fascist, I think "Marxist-Fascist" is an appropriate term." "Oh, and if you say they're not nationalists - who nationalised the industries and created the NHS in the 1940s? Nationalism is Socialism, remember."
186
@АлексейКанаев-р8х how do you define far-right?
4
TIK, please stop calling the goverment of the UK Fascist. By no definition, neither the classical nor your own, the British goverment is Fascist. You defined Fascism as "National Syndicalism with a philosophy of Actualism". You have commented under your recent community post to a person doubting you "Unions are workers councils. The Local Councils are them. The "corporation" (corpus, body, organs of the state - the council) were set up as unions. They come from the Municipal Corporations Act in the 1830s (although their origins predate this)." You may be describing Syndicalism, but it’s definetly not national and the people in the goverment I doubt are Actualists.
3
@Ronbo1948 is the Labour Party or the Conservatives controlling UK currently?
3
@katrinapaton5283 Well, of course, you, as a (Marxist/Fascist) think that Marxist-Fascism is imposible, but from an observer’s point of view, it makes sense as 'National Syndicalism with a philosphy of Marxist Hegelianism' isn’t much different from 'National Syndicalism with a philosophy of Actualism (Fascist Hegelianism)' (this is TIK’s definition of Fascism (which I believe, because I couldn’t find a better one and because of his good and down-to-earth explanation).
2
@katrinapaton5283 I also don’t know if Fascist-Marxist is a good way to describe them, I’m not into British politics and I agree on most stuff, except one - what’s the defining factor in right vs left politics? I see it thrown around as a kind of insult (not in your case) so I stopped using it entirely. I’d say left vs right should be based on complete anarchy vs communism. The more the state controls, the more it’s on the left. Or let’s just reinvent left vs right into up vs down idk lol
2
😂😂
1
@TheImperatorKnight Full nationalism is always socialism, but full socialism is not always nationalism.
1
42:22 “And if the Jewish press today believes that it can make veiled threats against the National Socialist movement, they should be careful. One day our patience will run out and the Jews' insolent lying mouths shall be shut for them!” -Göbbels, 1933
1
@jerrymoore838 ?
1
@Will46666 okay but answer question.
1
@seanbeadles7421 who is
1
@katrinapaton5283 i’m sorry for offending you. You don’t have to accept what TIK says neither immediatly nor ever. I misread your message to say "we’re not fond of each other" instead of "they were not fond of each other". I didn’t mean to call you a Fascist/Marxist, I just misread your message and thought you said that was the case. But do you understand my argument that Marxist-Fascist is not necesiraly impossible? I don’t know what you would say is the definition of Fascism, but 'far-right ultra-nationalist' just ain’t it. We then need to choose a defining factor for the right and the far-right. Ultra-nationalism is also not a very good word as many people claim that both the Fascists in Italy and the National Socialists in Germany are ultra-nationalists, but one goverment mass-[unalived] its own population because of 'race' and the other did not. TIK’s definition is the only concrete definition I have come across and therefore I believe it, because words have meanings. I remember one guy on youtube video claiming that Fascism has no definition, which makes the word pointless. So, TIK’s definition of Fascism is 'National[istic] Syndicalism [trade unionism] with a philosophy of Actualism [Fascists Hegelianism]'. And according to TIK, the UK goverment is Nationalist, because it nationalized stuff, syndicalist because of the local councils and not actualist but since many socialists believe in some form of Hegelianism, according to him it’s Marxist-Fascist. I agree with this except for the Nationalist part. I don’t agree with TIK here, because nationalizing something doesn’t make you a nationalist. Before, I simoly explained his view which he explained to me.
1
@royale7620 well, patriotism is loving your country, but not excluding other countries and not wanting to kick out immogrants. Nationalism is usually exclusionary and opens the door for deportation and all that bad stuff So, they’re just different levels. About the Fascism - I also don’t like hik calling the Laborers Fascist - it’s almost like those WOKE screaming students in their protests, calling liberals and minarchists (not mOnsarchists) Fascist. In the comment section he said that it would better be called Marxist-Fasist, but in the video - as you say - he may be overwhelmed by anger or sadness or maybe even excitement that maybe, the British people will realise what bs they voted for.
1
@sheepleskateboardspodcast ah yes another antisemite
1
@sheepleskateboardspodcast ah yes for sure, although he has publiclt denounced then
1
@tand8100 because they’re responsible
1