Comments by "Ficus-lovin\x27 Capybara N\x27 pals • 🌟 • 25 yrs ago" (@YourCapybaraAmigo_17yrsago) on "" video.
-
13
-
12
-
@NIN0ID We live in a dystopia where some people have the gall to try to intentionally prevent others from meeting their basic needs simply because that person wants to feel superior to that other person and the other person, for whatever reason doesn't have enough money at the moment of need to meet the price demanded. It's especially revolting when this happens in regards to Goods Already Disposed Of (GADO). In my future policies, it will be ILLEGAL to attempt to prevent access to GADO. When you actively dispose of something you are releasing your claim in it and from that moment on you have NO moral or legal right to prevent anyone else from accessing it. It's called the Law of Claim Transferrence- or it would as soon as I can get that passed.
No one has the right to throw something away, declaring officially THEY DO NOT WANT THAT ITEM ANYMORE, but then have the gall to say BUT NO NOT THEM! THEY CAN'T HAVE IT!
The moment something goes in the trash, IT'S NOT YOURS ANYMORE, ITS UP FOR GRABS. This is basic common sense and anyone who values property rights would have to agree. Your property is yours up until the moment you dispose of it. If one still wants to lay claim to an item or items, THEN DONT DISPOSE OF IT. It's very simple. This is a simple right-and-wrong principle as true for businesses as individuals.
How disgusting is it that we live in a place where people are made to feel guilty for taking what others have WILLINGLY THROWN AWAY. Yes we have reached full absurdity and injustice.
I am SO far outside of these sick paradigms. I mean I guess compared to most people I'm WAYYY out here on the bleeding edge of Leftness but to me it's like, this is simple Right and Wrong. I feel like the whole country is caught up inside a mental r4pe scarcity cult, and it starts at the TOP.
In MY world (if I'm ever in a public position of authority), ANYONE caught artificially producing scarcity via any means gets a 25K $$ fine, if they are a business, and it only goes up from there. For an individual islts community service. Second offense for a business, 30 days in jail for the owner, with worker release.
I am so sick of this shit. This shit of ENFORCED ARTIFICIAL LACK must end. I want to be the one that ends it.
We have enough to go around TWICE. There is no excuse for all this waste and corresponding poverty. Poverty is a public policy choice NOT an unfortunate unavoidable reality we can't do anything about, like it's a fixture of the universe. 99% of scarcity in our world is artificially created through ignorance or active malice by those at all levels in the supply chain.
I intend to try to force ballot measures in my state to try to force Comprehensive Anti-Scarcity Policy among other things, at my earliest opportunity.
12
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@PvblivsAelivs @John Undefined it's still bullshit. I agree an owner is entitled to some of the profits but the LIE and the vicious amorality of crapitalism is that owners deserve EVERYTHING... less perhaps something for their investors. One, why do investors deserve ANYTHING besides the repayment of their investment with some profit on top?? Its completely unjust and unfair to pay someone PERMANENT rewards for a ONE-TIME contribution. It's a ludicrous Ponzi scheme and it should be illegal!!! It's a way to reap profit with no work! It's WRONG. IT'S ABSOLUTELY WRONG and criminal and it's THEFT!!!! It's big-time theft.
WORKERS GIVE THEIR HEARTS, MINDS, AND HANDS- AND FOR THAT WE DESERVE FAR HIGHER WAGES THAN ARE CURRENTLY GIVEN, PLUS OUR FAIR SHARE OF THE PROFITS THESE MINDS, HANDS, AND WORK HAS CREATED. A fair profit share for all workers is at least 60%, divided among everyone, on top of high base wages.
Yes owners might have founded it and made some decisions and had some ideas. Let it be said I don't deny that. But don't act like that is the whole equation. Without workers HEARTS, MINDS, and HANDS that "OWNER" WOULDN'T HAVE JACK SHIT!!!!!!!!!!
So unless that owner can clone himself 1000 times over, he better recognize that at least 50% of the net profits generated by his company's workforce belong to those employees. Really more like 60%. Once a business is up and running and established, owners and top execs aren't very useful.
I WANT MY PROPORTIONAL 60%, WE ALL DESERVE IT! You people live in a gross mass of self-delusion and conceit when you deny that WE DO IT ALL!!! You're lucky we don't demand everything! I'm being generous by saying an owner's share if 40-50% of total net profits. That's very generous, because the 50-60% left over still has to be split among all employees.
The fact that owners provide starting materials is nice, but immaterial. Without US, namely our HEARTS, HEADS AND HANDS- YOU DONT HAVE JACK SHIT. YOU GOT NOTHING! Most of what Labor produces should stay with them, including any intellectual property discoveries, and profits, less a reasonable return to the owners for said materials.
All non-compete agreements are likewise abusive and over-the-line and should be flatly illegal.
Workers have to make decisions all day long- there are plenty of up-to-the-moment on-site decision-making many employees and middle management make during their shift or work hours, so I don't buy that just because a few pampered C-suite desk jockeys, who do zero productive work, who may make a few company-wide decisions or craft a few ideas, justifies a grossly excessive paycheck far in excess of everyone else who does the real work in the organization.
Can you understand this, you capitalist apologist? You can nod yes.
3
-
@OP yep.
Look, no system is perfect. For the few who can't hack it or won't try, there are simple enough measures to deal with those guys. Carrots and sticks, like anything else. Worst case scenario they can be let go. Do I think it would be any kind of a serious problem? Nah I def don't.
I used to be in the Navy. In govt jobs every rank makes a certain amount, which is openly known and easily accessible to all. The money is decent but nothing special. It's modest at the lower ranks, not bad as you get higher up. And yet, even tho the money wasn't all that great, (but decent) most of us chose to work hard and go above and beyond many times. Why is that? Well, various reasons. To gain a positive reputation among peers or superiors as hardworking or knowledgeable or skilled; to feel a sense of accomplishment or satisfaction after completion of a project, to gain expertise we think we may need later, to feel like noble heroes doing our part for the country's defense (I'm over this now, I hate the feds, but I'm a grizzled 40yo sourpuss now, when I was younger I knew less so I thought the feds were honorable and their agenda was honorable. Boy talk about being wrong).
But the point is, there are a lot of reasons people can be motivated to put in their share of the effort to a cause above and beyond money. And for those who don't want to, or can't keep up, there are ways to work with that person usually. If the best thing to do for them and the organization is to cut them loose, that's easy enough to do.
3
-
@PvblivsAelivs btw, it seems we can agree that if one can successfully start their own business then that's fine. It's fine just fine. I want everyone to have their own independent business if that is what they want. Why do you think I hate corporations so goddamn much? Because they make it harder and harder and harder and harder for small and independent businesses and local chains to survive and thrive. Of course worthless politicians at all levels are equally guilty of this because they are bought and paid for and they pass the ordinances and the policies that serve and protect corporate dominance in in our neighborhoods and all over.
So you see, living under a corporate dominance dictatorship is pretty crappy for a lot of different people and interests.
But the fact is no matter what size business it is sooner or later you come back to the fact that you are going to have a business owner, some management, and some workers.
Or, in the case of a university or a school, a president, some higher-level administrators, and the staff.
It is time to respect and reward labor of all collars at all levels properly.
Well well the elites have certainly enjoyed buying and owning the government for the last 200 years, what do you say it's time for the People to have that same privilege??
I bet you're not rich. You're the People, foo'. Time you wised up.
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1