Ficus-lovin\x27 Capybara N\x27 pals • 🌟 • 25 yrs ago
Institute for Justice
comments
Comments by "Ficus-lovin\x27 Capybara N\x27 pals • 🌟 • 25 yrs ago" (@YourCapybaraAmigo_17yrsago) on "Behind the Scenes of the Caswell Forfeiture Victory" video.
I guarantee every single hotel or motel, from the smallest mom-and-pop operation of to the biggest chain, have had gobs of illegal illegal activity taking place on their property, and it is NOT the proprietors' responsibility or fault if this occurs. THEY CANNOT REASONABLY BE EXPECTED TO CONTROL WHAT HAPPENS ON EVERY CORNER OF THEIR PARKING LOT AT EVERY MOMENT, OR BEHIND THE DOOR OF EACH PRIVATE ROOM.
This behavior from the DEA or any other government agency violates the principle of REASONABLE EXPECTATION, ergo it falls flat on its face. It's a gross obvious money grab, and if there's any judges left in this country of conscience, the case should have been thrown out on its face.
We need to start seeing the federal apparatus for the massive criminal entity that it really is. It's nothing more than other people that claim to have more rights than you, and we have to reject that.
There would be no motels or hotels left in this country if they were all seized due to so-called "illegal" activity.
"Illegal". What a cute code word. Government cartel thugs have gotten away with so many crimes against humanity and eye watering amounts of grand theft simply because they've been able to throw out that word, and as all court rulings hinge on what is so-called legal versus illegal, they always get away with it.
Must be nice to write your own rules.
The thing is I don't oppose the existence of laws themselves, provided they're limited, circumspect and appropriate; I oppose property theft or seizures based on violations of said laws. Unless there's an entire estate which was created due to child sex-trafficking, the government has no right to take what is yours for any reason, supposed illegal activity or no.
1
I do hope Satan waits for all predators. The DEA must have thought this would be an easy killing. Elderly couple, few resources, like taking candy from a baby. Easiest kill in the world. Couldn't be easier, they must have thought.
WE NEED IMMEDIATE LAWS INDEMNIFYING ALL APARTMENT OWNERS, LANDLORDS AND MOTEL PROPRIETORS FROM ANY LEGAL LIABILITY REGARDING SO-CALLED ILLEGAL ACTIVITY ON THEIR PROPERTY.
Or at a minimum, full prior knowledge MUST be able to be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt before liability can be enforced. Even so the censure must be reasonable. Unless the property was being used to cause harm to minors AND the ownership was well aware of this, no seizure should ever be allowed.
I live in an apartment currently. Unless I draw attention to myself from local cops, it is not fair in any way to hold my landlord responsible for what occurs inside my apartment. I have an expectation of privacy on this property and within my unit. If I'm doing something wrong, and it comes to the attention of the manager, then that's one thing. But no, without any prior knowledge, you CANNOT hold property owners or managers responsible for what the permanent or temporary users do while on that property, and it's the HEIGHT of evil and viciousness and psychopathy to try to reach into the past and say that someone deserves to pay a price today for something that may or may not have happened years ago, when that issue has already been long concluded. If it is no longer occurring, and there is no recent or long-standing pattern, than then it is over and it cannot be dredged up again as a thin pretext for grand theft.
Even in exterior public spaces, unless there was one or more aspects that were physically unsafe, its not the proprietors fault if someone chooses to do something wrong or so-called illegal. Owners cannot be expected to monitor and control the behavior every single human being that passes through occupies a square foot on their property. This is unrealistic and it's something we shouldn't want. If it comes to their attention that something wrong is happening than they should take appropriate action, but prior to that, they cannot be expected to know in real-time everything that is happening. This would require 1984 levels of surveillance and is something nobody should want.
I can only imagine the inner corruption and psychopathy of the typical federal judge on these trumped-up immoral cases. The defendants in these cases never have a chance.
Government agents are nothing but high-class criminals. I've never understood their evil or anyone's I really haven't.
To breathlessly cause extreme harm to another person either through their property, their finances, or their person, for no other reason other than personal gain, and be able to sleep at night. But sociopathy is a disease which affects unfortunately all too many.
THIS ILLICIT AND EVIL BUSINESS WITH DEMONIZING DRUGS HAS BEEN SO RUTHLESS AND SO USEFUL TO GOVERNMENT DEMONS OVER THE PAST 50 YEARS. HOW MANY BILLIONS HAS IT BROUGHT THEM IN TOTAL THEFT AND ILL-GOTTEN GAINS? HOW MANY HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OR MILLIONS OF LIVES AS IT DESTROYED EITHER IN THE SHORT-TERM OR THE LONG-TERM?? HOW MANY FAMILIES HARMED FOREVER BECAUSE OF THE SATANIC EVILS OF MASS INCARCERATION??
I pray to God to bring us out of this dark age when something as worthless and pointless and meaningless as consenting adult drug use are used as the excuse to cause absolute murder, the vicious theft of millions of human beings' lives and potential as they're thrown into ugly cages, and the criminal dispossession of assets on an industrial scale.
I know I sound extreme but I really do pray for the destruction of the entire US government apparatus. It is nothing but a criminal enterprise writ large; based on murder, violence, and industrial scale dispossession both from and to US citizens and dozens of nations abroad. The DEA is just one small part of this monster.
1
1
1
1
There's NO WAY a hotel or motel proprietor can control what happens in every single guest room, that's an outrageous expectation. Provided a given guest doesn't cause a commotion or draw attention to themselves, what they do behind the closed door of their own room is known only to them.
There might be drugs, there might be prostitution and you know what, that's perfectly fine provided it's done between consenting over-aged adults.
Even if it's sex trafficking, which is heinous and which should be rightfully prosecuted, a motel proprietor shouldn't be held responsible because they are not going to have every room under surveillance nor should they be able to. The problem with a guarantee of privacy to all guests is that some guests will misuse it.
You can't hold hotel owners responsible for what to guests do in the privacy and concealment of their own room. That is vile and revolting. Now, once it comes to the attention of the proprietor, they will have a choice how to respond, but even if they choose to allow it, it doesn't mean they deserve to lose their entire business, I don't see how those two connect. If local authorities want to charge business owners with aiding and abetting, that's one thing, provided they can prove foreknowledge took place; but that in no way gives them anymore right to take their private property or any of their income.
No public agent should have a financial stake in someone's private property. I mean the conflict-of-interest is beyond outrageous!
This isn't about stopping or slowing down so-called crime, this is about Mass Grand theft!!! The proceeds of the sale were going to go directly into the DEA agents' pockets.
May every government agent in this country, every corrupt cop, every crooked public official rot in hell! While they're out they're destroying small-town and small-business America, they're dicksucking and enabling massive tax crime and other crime for the 1%.
Just look at East Palestine for what big business giants get away with.
1
1
I don't care if they were running a massive drug ring out of that place, or a massive prostitution ring, they worked for that place. Nobody was forced to stay there, nobody was harmed on the property that we know of. There's nothing wrong with drugs or consenting prostitution and it's just that the government is made up of psychopaths who will use any pretext to come in and destroy you and take everything you have. They claim they have the right because..... well because nothing, they just claim they have the right. They love to commit crime, so they do, but they pretend it isn't crime. It's not a crime if Uncle Sam does it right???
Unless somebody was being held hostage on that property or something else heinous was going on, nobody has the right to commit violence or theft against the owners.
Too many people get on their knees and obey. They like being ruled, they don't seem to really want rights. I find it strange but idk, everyone rolls over the moment they hear the word "law", as if that word actually means anything. Do these laws come straight from the mouth of the divine, or are these made by corrupt individuals who are only out for themselves and who are menaces to society?? As if by the mere existence of calling something a law makes it unquestionable and right. Ugh that's how you get people to follow and obey without question. Ugh. So if they came out with laws against eating bananas, or bringing back human property, or child marriage, or any other heinous or outrageous thing, would these other people just roll over and take it? I guess so. People act like laws shouldn't be challenged, I don't get it. I really don't. Anytime you vote for an all-powerful State to exist you are voting for yourself to have no power. Why would anyone want to live like that?? The word "law" is just a trick of language to make people slaves to corrupt politicians who represent elite interests. Give me a break. ALL laws should be subject to challenge at any time.
If it wasn't drugs, it would be something else. In the 1920s it was alcohol tho even then, based on my knowledge they never used that as a reason to destroy an entire owner's business or give someone a long jail sentence. It was usually just a fine and a destruction of the alcohol on hand.
Govt people are animals. Nobody in government has a conscience, it's just an excuse to commit crime with impunity. Look how long they protected Jeffrey Epstein.
They don't want to work so they want to take what we have. It's THAT simple. Same as Pigs everywhere.
It's the mob all over again, just more pernicious because this one has a patina of legitimacy.
1