Comments by "Ficus-lovin\x27 Capybara N\x27 pals • 🌟 • 25 yrs ago" (@YourCapybaraAmigo_17yrsago) on "EXPOSED: Seattle's \"Affordable\" Housing Law" video.

At least one thing that's getting better in San Diego and other places in CA is that the barriers to entry for ADUs are coming down, and with pressure they will continue to drop, so that's one bright spot in these matters here. KEEP FIGHTING THE EVIL OF LOCAL GOVT aka GANGSTERISM IFJ!!! We need you so thank you for never giving up.
8
This is what we are fighting in the legal weed industry in CA right now. They are making war on small weed shops everywhere in this state. It's getting ugly. These people are ruthless but so are we. I don't own a weed shop but I work as an advocate for those who do. We will never stop fighting these animals for our rights in this industry. ABE, artificial barriers to entry WILL be made illegal in my lifetime. We'll fight it as long as it takes. It's CRIMINAL but everyone in the red-blue gang here is a sadist and a sociopath. Nothing new. We're used to it.
2
350K sounds like an incredible bargain where I live, but I know what you mean. It's a problem everywhere now.
1
I'm a pretty hardcore communist and I don't want that. I want everyone to own their own home and land if that is what they want.
1
Wrong. Both parties only want to serve and protect the already rich. Actual commies like me DONT WANT THIS! WE WANT EVERYONE IN THEIR OWN FKG HOME AND LOCAL GOVT OUT OF OUR LIVES FOREVER.
1
You just admitted the system is fucked and must be changed. Let's focus on fixing that first so people DONT have to live like sardines, eh?
1
We need a PREDATORY FEE AND FINE prohibition law put into law in every state. It's called the eighth amendment and it already exists federally but clearly local governments seem content to violate it on the regular, knowing few will have the resources or will to fight it all the way up the court chain. If it was passed at the state legislature level that would go a lot further to stopping this nonsense. It's a lot harder for them to flagrantly violate State law being that it's only one level above them and relatively easy to sue over I would think.
1
I thought Ksharma is on the council. Did she oppose this?
1
So it's all about hurting lower income and black communities. What's shock. SHAME ON ALL LOCAL GOVERNMENTS!! THEIR FEES ARE USURY AND ARE CAUSING EXTREME HARM EVERYWHERE THEY ARE APPLIED! EXCESSIVELY FEES AND FINES ARE EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED BY THE 8TH AMENDMENT!! They expressly were written to prevent just these kinds of scenarios and dynamics. LOCAL GOVS STILL DO IT BEC THEY BANK ON PEOPLE NOT KNOWING THEIR RIGHTS OR BEING WILLING TO FIGHT. VERY SAD. ALWAYS FIGHT MY FRIENDS! ALWAYS FIGHT LOCAL GOVT!!!!! BIG BUSINESS OWNS YOUR LOCAL GOVT - DOESN'T MATTER WHERE YOU LIVE. BIG BUSINESS OWNS YOUR CITY HALL AND THAT'S WHY THEY HATE YOU, JOE Q AVERAGE. Doesn't matter where you go it's the same everywhere. Anywhere that's a populated suburb or in a metro area Big Business has wholly taken over your city council and probably for decades. This is all about trying to displace low-income and COC. It's all about gentrification and yuppi-fication. Disgusting. Thank you for fighting for the little guy IFJ. They're out here trying to KILL US ALL one way or another, AND THEY ARE RUTHLESS!!
1
But are you actually aware the GOP is even worse??? See my comment above to the other guy.
1
That was probably bogus faux rent control, designed to screw over disadvantaged communities and renters in the end, not help them. Much like these fees here.
1
I support genuine rent control. If they were allowed to continue gouging with rent then it definitely wasn't intended to be real rent control.
1
All we need is a federal or state rent control law where rent cannot be more than 15% of one's income or no more than 120% of the mortgage payment for properties under a mortgage. Boom, done. Now nobody can be extorted while renting any longer. Until that happens, rent will continue to be the boogeyman that enslaves everyone.
1
@aarondoty2210 you will not convince me. Most landlords are corporate. I agree excessive local fees are unethical and oppressive. Rent limitation is CRUCIAL!!!! Are you a landlord?
1
@aarondoty2210 WHO DO YOU THINK SPONSORS THOSE STUDIES!?! WAKE UP!!!!!!
1
@aarondoty2210 "THIS JUST IN, ALL PEDOPHILES SURVEYED SAYS TOUCHING KIDS IS COOL!"
1
Rent is OPPRESSIVE, and it must be limited as much as is possible in order to free people from it's oppressive grasp. If you don't have to rent, good for you. I do and I'm getting ass-banged in the process. It's WRONG. I'm willing to pay something fair, the amounts I stated, but not this. It's outrageous what landlords get away with. And I'm for the little landlord, they usually aren't the problem, the corporate mega-landlords are.
1
@aarondoty2210 I'm sorry you aren't open to facts right now. You're being ridiculous. It's not about studies, when it comes to this subject, it's about basic right and wrong. You must be young. You'll see more clearly in time. Now climate change otoh- standby
1
@aarondoty2210 and here's for you're climate change lay-education. Please gain logic. And a better sense of justice re: why rent is an unethical entity unless highly controlled. Again I'm not saying rent should be totally free, just modest. Enough for a bit of profit for the landlord but that's it. Climate change PL: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLr6RPTR1TaL_CmnEGpyt7PIyuQQcsAwjX
1
@aarondoty2210 I said LIMITED - NOT ABSENT.
1
@aarondoty2210 fyi, just so you know, as YT now hides replies, I have posted here 10 times, 11 counting this one.
1
@aarondoty2210 it's a bummer. I don't know why YT does it now. Very annoying.
1
@aarondoty2210 yeah a few seem to be hidden for absolutely no reason Here's more very good info why it's not right to stick people with high rent and some more info about the housing affordability problem (it's snarky but accurate): https://youtu.be/UDnFSlzMlGI
1