Comments by "Ficus-lovin\x27 Capybara N\x27 pals • 🌟 • 25 yrs ago" (@YourCapybaraAmigo_17yrsago) on "Inside the Brain of a Psychopath" video.

  1. 39
  2. 19
  3. 8
  4. 8
  5. 6
  6. 6
  7. 6
  8. 6
  9. 6
  10. 5
  11. 4
  12. 3
  13. 3
  14. 3
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. This is a very interesting ethical debate. I guess for me, it would come down to whether the person with these so-called conditions has harmed anyone and if so how much? If a person has been convicted of a serious violent crime and there is a treatment that we can use to make them better able to control these impulses, feel more respect for others, and to become more empathetic, would it not be irresponsible not to use it? I think I agree with the person up top where in these cases it should be presented as a choice. So we're still respecting the person's right to choose but we're also taking current and potential future victims rights' in consideration. So yes I think should be a choice between incarceration as both a punishment and future prevention, or institutionalizing while sending them through a particular treatment for a particular period of time to see if they can be trusted not to reoffend in the same violent manner upon completion of said treatment. I guess so long as a so-called socio- or psychopath is not out there actively harming anyone it wouldn't be right to take them by force and force them to undergo an invasive psychological process. However, once they cross over that line towards committing that violent crime, at that point then the matter has changed. It should either be up to a judge or jury to be give them a choice between treatment and just being incarcerated. I think that's as fair as possible under these circumstances. Basically, if a person has shown that they constitute a grave enough public threat that at the moment they need to be detained somewhere for public safety, then even though they may be undergoing a punishment, they should be given all opportunities to be rehabilitated. So based on current scientific and psychiatric knowledge we can try to rehabilitate a person and then of course we have to come up with ways to try to judge if these rehabilitative strategies have made a difference. This sort of dovetails into the bigger debate about the purpose of a Justice system. It's easy to just lock people up and forget about them. Weather person is a so-called sociopath or not, everyone should be given the opportunity to undergo and seek rehabilitation if they so choose. If they refuse then I guess that is their choice as well. Then they can simply remain incarcerated while serving other time. But any kind of incarceration without comprehensive rehabilitation programs and therapies automatically fails both the inmate, the victim, and society 100%, IMO.
    1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1