Comments by "Ficus-lovin\x27 Capybara N\x27 pals • 🌟 • 25 yrs ago" (@YourCapybaraAmigo_17yrsago) on "Woman falls in love with angry HOMELESS cat" video.

@sparkist95 if I'm paying my hard earned money to rent, I deserve a say in the rules. Or they can find someone else who will be a slave without resistance.
8
@fretbuzz59 you're right. Some pet owners are pretty sorry. But isn't that what pet deposits are for? I don't agree with pet rent but a reasonable refundable deposit is fair.
2
@fretbuzz59 with a reasonable refundable deposit, you're goddamn right I'm entitled. A pet is necessary for my sanity and quality of life. Don't you think the it's landlord's responsibility to maintain their property?? What are they doing with all that rent!?!? So you don't think landlords should be forced to pay anything is that how you feel??? It should be the law that all pets must be accepted, but a LL has the right to request an additional refundable deposit if they wish, provided it's not excessive.
2
@Boba_Fett1980 then don't be a landlord or demand a pet deposit. I agree some pet owners should do better but animals are part of our lives. Will you tell them not to have children too????
2
@JokingSteak tables I can understand. But couches, no. Pets have the right to join you on the couch and if you loved them nobody would have to tell you this, you would do it naturally. You would want them to sit with you. Clearly you don't really love your pets, you just enjoy having them as fluffy accessories.
2
@JokingSteak lol you obviously don't at all love your pets if you place inanimate objects above them. Yuck so many unloving, dead inside pet owners out there. If you don't know how to love DONT GET A PET! Why is this so hard for you people to understand?
2
@fretbuzz59 that's called being a landlord you entitled besh
1
@fretbuzz59 not if they jack up rent, not if they prevent pets, not if they slumlord. Not if they are abusive or irresponsible. If they are responsible and charge fairly and don't try to prevent pet ownership then I don't have an issue, otherwise yes. I do.
1
@coratico298 exactly. Like this is just common fucking sense. Tenant can be held liable for any pet damage, but it's immoral to prevent them from having one (or several).
1
@usandutz I can see you have no soul. Carry on.
1
@peterwhitey4992 you múst be a landlord. You filth are greedy and shameless. You're entitled elitist FILTH who feel entitled to extort tenants for outrageous sums while never or rarely maintaining the property and using every scam in the book to get out of paying for ANYTHING. Landlords are truly some of the worst filth humanity has to offer. If rent isn't low, if pets aren't allowed, if tenants don't have "misfortune protections", if deposits are excessive or not returned, if landlords are abusive or overbearing, or if evictions are undertaken for unjust reasons, the tenant is being screwed. News flash - the tenant is almost ALWAYS being screwed in the US and that needs to stop. See you in the courts. We WILL get the law on our side, no matter what it takes.
1
@sparkist95 they still shouldn't have had a ban. A reasonable pet deposit should have been enough. Only petty selfish people who have never loved an animal uses pet bans. Most landlords are trash. You shouldn't suck their d-ck.
1
@sparkist95 actually the government should set the price. Landlords should have NO right to control the price of rent. It's an obvious conflict of interest. But corporate lobbyists have been able to buy off the worthless politicians for generations so you filth have been able to have it all your way- which is outrageous and won't last forever so enjoy it while you can. Change is coming sooner or later. You filth will get beat down to where you belong - and you won't be able to r4p3 the hell out of tenants' bank accounts and slumlord anymore.
1