Comments by "Martin Maat" (@MartinMaat) on "Fox News" channel.

  1. He just made that up like he makes up a lot of stuff. He is used to fighting his battles in the news media. That works if you are up for an election. Let's just wait and see how this works out in court for him. Hopefully for him better than the last 60+ times he had some business there over some kind of presidential election thing.
    5
  2. Yeah, it's hard to imagine that some people would care about what happens to the world after they're gone. Really suspicious. Better listen to those that say "Let's sabotage any attempt to turn this imminent disaster around. Whatever happens, we won't be here anyway! Besides, science is just another opinion.".
    3
  3. Respect to Tucker for keeping that face up all the time. That must have taken some serious training.
    3
  4. Some people read and listen to experts instead of just watching Fox and running circles in their Facebook bubbles. And what do you know, they get smart.
    2
  5. That clip he showed was obviously about something different. He's pulling something that someone said (or not) out of context and pins it on "the left". Apparently this is good enough for the fan base. It is Goebbels textbook.
    2
  6. Carlson was not crazy enough? It seems Fox will try anything to win back the fascist crowd.
    2
  7. Wow, a Tucker Carlson investigation! Be careful now, you may end up being regarded a journalist.
    2
  8. Wow! He is listening, he is thinking about his reply before opening his mouth, he realizes he does not have an answer, then tells the reporter what he does know. The notes makes it clear that he listened to his staff beforehand and, quite literally, took note... I say, impeach the guy!
    1
  9. I know, you folks want your dictator. And he will wrap up all of your enemies, mission accomplished, country done, live happily ever after, nothing to complain anymore.
    1
  10.  Benny Dover  And change is bad, right? Whatever the circumstances.
    1
  11.  Benny Dover  I wouldn't know, would I? I do know you're not real, your account is just 3 weeks old and was specifically created to post trolling messages, to spread fear, uncertainty and doubt. How much do you get paid to do this anyway? And by whom?
    1
  12.  Benny Dover  Your grammar is too poor to be a bot or an American (so, really poor). Yet you are being incoherent and not responding to what people write, you are just calling them names. You could be a bot created by a Russian. The AI needs work.
    1
  13.  Benny Dover  I wonder what will happen if I do not use any words that could trigger a response. Will it still reply with the icy crystal and the odd double question mark?
    1
  14.  Benny Dover  Yep, I am talking to a piece of software with a very limited vocabulary.
    1
  15. They went from promoting destruction to sabotaging the repairs. The latter appears to be less exciting to the crowd they created.
    1
  16. It seems to me he either made this all up just to have another thing to rant about (the NSA cannot confirm nor deny what they do so it is a perfect target) or he really was talking to the enemy, got notified he was being investigated and went public with it upfront to create his own narrative. Shouldn't we just wait and see what comes out of this, if anything? He is a noisy git alright, maybe worse. We'll see.
    1
  17. The point is only ids that cost money to obtain will be deemed acceptable according to the new law. This makes it harder to vote for those on a tight budget.
    1
  18.  @guthrie1181  So? That is food for a couple of days. The new law has an array of discouraging measures that limit access. The only problem it solves is too many people voting democrat. But we were not allowed to hear any of that. The host made sure the guest did not get to talk.
    1
  19.  @A_Chill_BirdYT  So? It would be a hurdle, right? What's there to laugh about?
    1
  20.  @guthrie1181  OK, that clears it up. You acknowledge the voter suppression but you regard it to be a good thing because it only disenfranchises people you would not want to have a say in anything anyway. So we agree on what this is, we only have different ideas about what is should be like. Just don't be too surprised when, once what is now left of your democracy has been killed with your help, the people in power won't be the least bit interested in what you'll have to say either.
    1
  21.  @A_Chill_BirdYT  Almost all messages written here make a statement about others somehow being inferior. And that's it. A collective need to dominate, to feel superior, to look down on others. It's a cult of hate and disgruntlement, seemingly just for the sake of it. And it has become an industry, Fox is making money by catering to the sentiment, lots of politicians are doing the same. Does it ever occur to any of you that this is just weird?
    1
  22. Tucker Carlson can blow my whistle.
    1
  23. Fox is nothing but a noise machine. Make up a story and stir it up like it matters. Giving new meaning to "covering the news". All to keep you dumb folks.
    1
  24. Notice he went from quietly taking bribes and casting his sponsors' message to open pan handling and complaining about his former sponsors that they are no longer willing to bribe him. Well apparently they no longer want to be associated with your because you are hurting their business by cuddling up to the Big Loser who is rocking the boat too much. Also mind that companies not necessarily oppose paying taxes, they just want a level playing field. Getting educated workers and proper infrastructure in return may be attractive to them.
    1
  25. Today Tucker discovered advertising. He's learning something new every day.
    1
  26. You idiots, the NSA is monitoring everyone (including American citizens) because they are executing Bush era policy. You may disagree with this but do not pin it on the current government, that makes no sense whatsoever.
    1
  27. He is making a case for dictating (by the government) what is being lectured in schools and what is not. That is exactly what the Russians and the Chinese do. And somehow that would be a plea for freedom. Right. Let's go full dictatorship in the name of anti-Marxism. And then the kicker: "And that's just a small example". There's more?
    1
  28. None of you seem to have a clue what you are mad about. You watch a talking head spreading disinformation and your heads start to spin. You are sheep paving the way for a lot that doesn't care about anything but themselves. When they get their way you will be waste, just like the people you now blame for everything.
    1
  29. Stop making sense, it's those pesky windmills I tell ya!
    1
  30. Well, there's a creative spin to voter suppression.
    1
  31. He just made this up like most things he talks about. One look at his face should tell you he is like that kid in school that tells sensational stories just for kicks. But now that we're at it, you all seem to have forgotten that mass surveillance on citizens and making it legal was introduced by the George Bush administration. If you want to blame democrats for anything, think of something else.
    1
  32. "Like Venezuela!" That didn't take long this time.
    1
  33. This is just smoke and mirrors to prevent Americans from being educated about American history, right? As if the current generation is not stupid enough already.
    1
  34. I am not so sure about collusion either, it may just be an accidental alignment of interests. Apparently Murdoch want to start a civil war in the US and by the looks of it he is doing just great without any Russian help.
    1