Comments by "Martin Maat" (@MartinMaat) on "Trump’s Sioux City Speech in 90 Seconds" video.

How creative. And it would actually mean something, make sense even, if it weren't for your array of prime ministers over the last 40+ years.
65
@23merlino 40+ may be a bit harsh, I wanted to include Thatcher. There may have been some (and only some) not particularly horrible people since, but you can hardly call any of them witty or compassionate or whichever of those casually spouted qualifications not applicable to Trump.
3
@TroIIingThemSoftly Yes it does. It shows that when push comes to shove, like when it is time to vote, none of the perceived qualities listed mean shit to the British public, they will vote for the most humorless, cruel, horrible people just the same.
1
@bobcprimus I challenge you on Sunak. Sunak is the worst and no better than trump. Trump mainly spouts nonsense, Sunak spouts diabolical poisonous sewage.
1
@mikchi5150 You talking to me? I'm Dutch.
1
@Lea-zf7lm Honour? Really?... Lying, cheating, diplomatic disaster Boris Johnson, honour?! Self serving corrupt-to-the-core genocidal maniac Rishi Sunak, honour? Are we on the same page of the Oxford Dictionary?
1
@jazzthedog86 Fair enough, I don't see a religious component in Britain. But there's plenty of narcissism going round.
1
@s2wheels That would make really good television, it would beat the coronation.
1
@WickedDandelion Yeah, well. I looked up the list yesterday and found Gordon Brown, the one who made no impression at all that I had totally forgotten about, likely because he was sort of sane and descent, only lasted 3 years, the shortest of them all. We already know the next one will be horrible, bought and paid for by big business like any conservative, defending genocide like Sunak. If this is humor, it is pretty dark humor.
1