Comments by "Bri Ryder" (@nesseihtgnay9419) on "CaspianReport" channel.

  1. russia using ww2 tactics
    1
  2. Putin is losing, so now all he have is nukes 😆 a crazy paranoid man like putin if backed to a corner he will kill himself and people around.
    1
  3. yea USAID is corruption
    1
  4. This all happened because of one crazy tyrant putin. Putin don't care if a nuclear war goes off, he's old about to die anyways, so putin would say why not take everyone with me?
    1
  5. What people don't know is that even china is not trying to get rid of the US dollars in total because the CCP knows that with its strict controls on its currency, no one would want to hold your currency. China and other countries can trade in Chinese yuan, but no one will want to hold the yuan in its reserve banks because the yuan is not transparent and flexible. You can't do it with whatever you want, you will have to ask the CCP to even do trading with other countries or businesses. The US dollar you can do whatever with it, that's why the can see the market values go up and down...while the chinese yuan won't ever be able to do that. BRICS has been failing as all the members don't see eye to eye either, india and China don't like and trust each other, so why would India want china to hold its currency like the IMF and world bank? Russia is sanctioned to hell because of the invasion, and South Africa is a failing country, Brazil is also just everywhere and not stable. So even if they are successful in making a BRICS currency, it won't even surpass the Euro. So all these propaganda that the "dollar is DEAD" is just that, propaganda.
    1
  6. That's all of what Russia has now is nukes 😆
    1
  7. The idea that the U.S. can remotely “turn off” the F-35 with a secret killswitch is pure spy-thriller fiction with zero proof. There’s no technical capability for a one-click shutdown, and even if there were, the U.S. would never use it—doing so would destroy its credibility, collapse its $100+ billion defense export market, and shatter trust with allies who co-developed and invested in the F-35 program. The aircraft continues to fly and fight even without fresh updates, and countries like the UK and Israel operate independent mission data labs. Meanwhile, so-called "independent" alternatives like Sweden’s Gripen aren’t truly free from American control either—it runs on a U.S.-made General Electric F414 engine, meaning Sweden still needs American parts and support to keep it flying. So whether it’s the F-35 or Gripen, the truth is that every modern fighter relies on global supply chains—especially American ones. The real story isn’t about a fantasy killswitch—it’s about how modern warfare is digitally and logistically interconnected, and the U.S. still holds most of the toolbox.
    1
  8. remember people it's a war game, not real
    1
  9. yea germany is stupid, and now they are paying the price
    1
  10. China is the biggest CO2 emissions in the world, more than the combined of all CO2 emissions from all other nations.
    1
  11. China is waking up the sleeping giant onces again
    1
  12. Everything needs semiconductor now, and the US are the ones who are the advantage because they created it
    1
  13. Let Russia keep doing this war to bleed out its money and military equipments and nato to build theirs up.
    1
  14. the US have your back India
    1
  15. Yea, china has the advantage of the island being so close
    1
  16. So what Iran do they are fucked 😂😂😂by
    1
  17. It is so stupid how people vall it a " trade war" 😂😂😂 no its about a reset because Canada and the world has taken advantage of America for far too long
    1
  18. China only has the biggest GDP PPP, but wealth and nominal and per capita, the US is still the biggest
    1
  19. Canada is full of radical liberals and activist, that has stopped Canadas growth
    1
  20. it's a war game, not real
    1
  21. thats why ukraine needs laser to take down iranian drones
    1
  22. lets stand together united against russian aggression, and the psycho putin
    1
  23. While the argument presents a compelling case against Trump’s apparent strategy to pivot toward Russia and sacrifice Ukraine to counter China, a strong counterargument can be made that this approach is not only pragmatic but potentially effective in reshaping global alliances to America’s long-term advantage. Here’s why Trump’s gambit could be a calculated success rather than a shortsighted failure. First, the critique assumes that Russia’s partnership with China is too entrenched to be disrupted. Yet, history shows that strategic alliances can shift when the incentives are right. The Russia-China relationship, while economically robust, is not without tension. Russia, a declining power with a resource-based economy, is increasingly the junior partner to China’s industrial and technological dominance. This dynamic rankles Moscow, which has long prided itself on its global stature. Trump’s offer—territorial gains in Ukraine, sanctions relief, and a rollback of NATO’s eastern presence—could exploit this unease, giving Russia a chance to reassert its autonomy and reduce its reliance on Beijing. The Cold War precedent of Nixon’s outreach to China succeeded not because the Sino-Soviet split was irreparable, but because the U.S. provided a better alternative. Trump could be betting on a similar logic: give Putin enough to loosen China’s grip without requiring a full rupture. Second, the argument overstates the stability of Russia’s alignment with China. Yes, trade between the two has soared, and military cooperation has deepened, but this partnership is largely a marriage of convenience driven by mutual opposition to the West. If Trump can reduce that opposition by easing sanctions and troop presence, Russia might see less need to cling to China. Unlike the critique’s suggestion, Putin doesn’t need to turn hostile toward Beijing; he only needs to prioritize Russian interests over Chinese ones. A deal with Trump could allow Russia to secure its western flank, regain economic breathing room, and diversify its geopolitical options—all without burning bridges with China. This isn’t about flipping Russia into an enemy of China; it’s about diluting their coordination to prevent a unified Eurasian bloc. Third, the nuclear escalation risks highlighted in the original argument actually bolster the case for Trump’s urgency. The Ukraine war has reached a dangerous tipping point, with Russia’s updated nuclear doctrine and provocative strikes signaling a willingness to escalate. Continuing the status quo—arming Ukraine while inching closer to direct NATO-Russia conflict—could spiral into catastrophe. Trump’s concessions, while costly, might be the lesser evil if they de-escalate tensions and avert a broader war. Sacrificing Ukrainian territory and NATO ambitions could be framed not as betrayal, but as a realist trade-off to stabilize Europe and free up U.S. resources for the Indo-Pacific, where China’s rise poses a far greater threat. Kissinger himself often argued that peace sometimes requires unpalatable compromises—a lesson Trump may be applying here. Fourth, the critique assumes Trump’s moves will irreparably damage NATO and U.S. credibility. But this overlooks the possibility that his deal-making could strengthen the alliance in the long run. European allies, while wary of Russia, are also fatigued by the Ukraine conflict and its economic fallout—energy crises, inflation, and refugee flows. A negotiated settlement, even one favoring Moscow, could ease these burdens and refocus NATO on countering China, a priority many members share. Trump could sell this as a strategic recalibration, not abandonment, especially if he secures Russian guarantees against further aggression. As for soft power, shuttering USAID’s democracy promotion might alienate some, but it could also signal a return to pragmatic diplomacy that resonates with nations tired of American moralizing. Finally, the argument’s fatal flaw is its dismissal of Trump’s unpredictability as a strength. Putin may doubt the longevity of a deal tied to Trump’s final term, but that same uncertainty could pressure him to act now rather than risk a harder-line successor. China, too, might miscalculate, overplaying its hand and pushing Russia toward the U.S. out of necessity. Trump’s willingness to upend norms—offering concessions no other president would—could disrupt the Russia-China axis in ways a conventional approach never could. In short, Trump’s strategy isn’t a reckless betrayal but a bold recalibration of U.S. priorities. By trading short-term losses in Ukraine for a potential wedge between Russia and China, he aims to secure America’s position against its most formidable rival. Geopolitics often demands sacrificing pawns to protect the king—and if this gamble pays off, the cost to Ukraine could pale beside the benefit of a fractured Sino-Russian front. Far from destroying American interests, Trump might just be redefining them for a multipolar world.
    1
  24. well there is nothing to do in qatar so i can understand why they spent 220 billion dollars on the world cup lol
    1
  25. in chinese debt trap
    1
  26. Scotland you need Britain
    1
  27. India wants to be a leader in world affairs but don't know how to choose and lead. India better hurry and choose a side, putin and his crazy paranoid murder rampage side? Or democracy as India claimed to be the biggest democracy country.
    1
  28.  @wickjohn8673  I side putin, I want India and russia to keep being friends, just not thug putin, until putin dies
    1
  29. Brazil also are the biggest fertilizer importer, from Russia and Ukraine, and now that Russia is sanctioned, Brazil will suffer, it's crops will die off, causing its economy to shrink.
    1
  30. Didn't graara was that important
    1
  31. lets do it iranian people, put this dictator down
    1
  32. The biggest threat to Europe’s rearmament isn’t just foreign enemies — it’s Europe’s own structural weaknesses. The continent is still far too dependent on American weapons, especially for critical systems like fighter jets and missile defense. While buying U.S. gear might be a short-term necessity, long-term it leaves Europe vulnerable and unable to control its own defense supply chains. On top of that, Europe’s military efforts are fragmented — each country is trying to do everything on its own, wasting resources and duplicating efforts. Instead of 27 small armies all building the same things, Europe should specialize by region and coordinate its defense strategies. Even worse, countries are still buying weapons separately, driving up costs and slowing production. Without joint purchasing and long-term EU-backed investments in factories and supply chains, Europe’s defense industry will stay weak. And looming over all of this is the risk of a financial crisis. Many European countries are already drowning in debt — massive new defense borrowing without financial reform could trigger a new eurozone crisis. Europe doesn’t just need to spend more — it needs to spend smarter, or risk repeating the mistakes of the past.
    1
  33. Which it will never with the CCP in power
    1
  34. The only thing making Russia relevant right now are their nukes, if they don't have nukes, no one would be taking Russia seriously 😆 seeing the outcome of Ukraine and Georgia. And other countries be claiming large lands from Russia, the only thing keeping other countries a bay from taking big parts from the Russians are their nukes.
    1
  35.  @Commievn  oh I'm sure. https://youtu.be/Fk-G5Xni6L4
    1
  36. @Kobe A5 Wagyu  now if you seen the video, now you know why it's a failed project.
    1
  37. @Kobe A5 Wagyu  no china isn't ASEAN, they aren't a member, they only trade just like the US does. And of course I know that ASEAN does rely on china alot because china are basically right there just cross the border, but trust me, even Vietnam don't like china to that extent, they allow US warships and russia to dock there, even Europe, to make sure that china can't bully them in there own waters, having the international community docking there is smart by Vietnam, Philippines is allowing the US more free rein around its country because of china's harassment and bullying.
    1
  38.  @Fauzanarief-n7i  the BRI wasnt just 1-2 years kid. its been going on for a decade
    1
  39. Russia or putin needs to stop his russian aggression. You collapsed those country aren't yours anymore
    1
  40. authoritarian countries like russia, iran and china are all starting wars that they want, russia started with the invasion of Ukraine, iran started and really want to join hamas to start a war against israel, and china said soon they will also start a war in taiwan. do you see the pattern here people. some of the biggest dictators, russia, iran and china want war and destruction
    1
  41.  @sosoable  inflation happens all the over the world not just some places. Inflation happens many times of the history already not just this time, do you know that right?
    1
  42.  @sosoable  you do know that the ccp are known for lying right? Their debt is 1 trillion dollars. They are surpassing the US alright lol, the US nominal gdp is 24 trillion dollars, china is 20 trillion dollars. The ppp gdp china is "leading" no one truly knows but they never tell the truth. But just because china is leading in ppp gdp, the per capita, china is far behind the US in wealth for its people. China is 17,000 dollars to US 60,000 dollars. You need to do alot more research before you come at me.
    1
  43.  @sosoable  wow you don't know at all huh, china economy is actually slowing, 80% of china's economy is fund by apartment buildings investment.
    1
  44.  @sosoable  you think the US is the only one printing under inflation lol you do know that the US dollar is still the world's currency right? China tried to take over the US dollar as the world's currency but it failed many times, literally 65% of the world using US dollars, the next closing one is the euro. Chinese yuan is 9%, and the way China is not transparent with their money makes no one wants to do business in Chinese yuan. So the US have to print for the world not just for America.
    1
  45.  @sosoable  https://youtu.be/RpwtZLzDM_o
    1
  46. Stringers scares the Russians 😆
    1
  47. i remember china came out with their fake superconductors 🤣🤣
    1
  48. Pakistan is collapsing anyways.
    1
  49. Thats the difference between the US and other countries, when your in other countries, your mainly seens as foreign worker or foreign citizen. When you come and live in the US your considered an American.
    1
  50. USA is the most powerful country in human history
    1