Youtube comments of Real Malta (@RealMalta-fx4sx).

  1. I don't think they'll bother with this anymore, as everything tasty is encrypted.
    9
  2. Her background is fake. I believe i met her in 2002 or 2003 in Croydon, where she had been quickly installed as a senior manager in what was then the Immigration and Nationality Directorate (where I worked). However, there's no mention of the Home Office on her CV. At the time, she behaved in a sneaky and underhanded way. She gathered information to use against people within the organisation. I think it's her modus operandi - she has an intense hatred for a certain type of person (eloquent men who have an education). That's my opinion. OK, Johnson definitely had it coming. But the key here is that she's had decades of practice as an unelected backstabbing politician (that's all a bureaucrat is) and has been sharpening her knives for a long time. I suspect her ultimate motivation is subversion but that her immediate motivations are more personal and psychological. In my opinion, she's a deeply sinister character.
    8
  3. There was 1066. That was a big change. But, otherwise, it remains the same, structurally. Even the majority of land in Britain is still owned by the 1066 families. The way to understand Britain is like Downton Abbey. Or, rather, think of it as an extended farm around Buckingham Palace. Everyone is a chattel, indentured by a currency and oppressive laws. You are not allowed to become like a 1066 family. Your energy and vital force is directed back to the enrichment and benefit of the inner circle of Charles 3. Parliament is a rubber stamp and parliamentary democracy is a 19th century legal fiction coined to win honours and other rewards from the king. All public appointments and even the BBC and the vetting and recruitment of intelligence, civil service, police and army are all done via secretive St James clubs. From Shakespeare to Eastenders, it's all about keeping you a peasant and a chattel. No such thing as generational wealth will ever exist for you, thanks to William of Orange and then coming off the gold standard. You have to race with all your power to stand still. You'll get chewed up and spat out when you're no longer productive. It's a curious and opaque system we have here, all under the direct control of agents of the REAL government.
    5
  4. Who cares what he says. There's only one language these people understand, and Israel speaks it fluently.
    5
  5. LOL that would be hilarious - him doing his kiddy karate katas. Would be so much fun to watch.
    3
  6. Wired! He's really wired!
    3
  7. Nobody is above the law.
    3
  8. Let's face it - anything his supporters give him goes straight up his nose. So it will be a matter of the equity in his house.
    2
  9. In comparison with politicians and senior civil servants, he is more intelligent than most of them. That would, usually, be a good thing. Unfortunately, he isn't as intelligent as he thinks he is and his self-awareness on this point is weak; he exhibits fake-humble behaviour. He claims to be able to put together good teams. The evidence very strongly suggests otherwise (e.g. Andrew Sabisky: a 100% Cummings recruit). Because of this, he overextends and makes serious mistakes. If I were forming a government I wouldn't want him in it. He needs INTJ types because he isn't one himself.
    2
  10. I agree with your last sentence and share your frustration with these guys but people coming on boats aren't the issue. It's the people (Iranian and Russian agents) who are well entrenched in British society sowing unrest and recruiting thugs (home grown and foreign) to destabilise the UK who are the problem.
    2
  11. I'd say that's highly probable.
    2
  12. No he didn't. He spread lies about someone called Hijazi.
    2
  13. He claimed a boy called Jamal Hijazi was assaulting girls. That was proved false (in a court of law). By saying these untrue things, he defamed Hijazi.
    2
  14. He isn't lying but he's wildly exaggerating the competence and activities of his organisation. That's probably why he issued this statement. This problem has been ongoing for at least 15 years and now he says he's doing something.
    2
  15. Not XP - NT.
    1
  16.  @Usman-c2c4i  Yes, Mahsa Amini was "cherished" in Iran
    1
  17. So let me get this right. An Indian came to the rescue of a Vietnamese? I bet if the Indian knew what the Vietnamese thought of Indians, she wouldn't have done that.
    1
  18. It happens ALL the time. The British are very weak at this game and Iran plays them. Example: British comes to Iran and converts to Islam. He doesn't say he's British - he says he's something else (because the British are hated there). The Iranians know who he really is and can arrest him at any time (hold him hostage) to swap for prisoners with London. They also install "students" in British universities to tag and tail Iranian critics and to monitor "archaeological research" (everyone knows, the real interest is in underground nuclear silos and not in some crummy bronze age axe heads). The Iranians are actually good at this game, while the British only think they're good at it. Real masters of the game are Americans.
    1
  19.  @1526andrews  Yes. I think I had a run-in with her many years ago, during the Blair years. If so, then yes, she is definitely a psychopath.
    1
  20. You are right but you have to remember there are important differences between now and then which cause people to reflexively distrust everything they're told. I wouldn't believe him either, but for having directly witnessed someone try to recruit thugs to beat up an Iranian in the UK (and tell me that's what he was doing). The reason the gen pop doesn't trust these guys is because they're untrustworthy - a lot of these problems are caused by failed, completely looney tunes MI6 operations which can't be acknowledged - and because nobody ever tells or informs or educates the gen pop about ANYTHING at all. Example: what are the causes of inflation, where does money come from, what is the economic impact of immigration, etc. Nobody explains the underlying theory. That's why what you're seeing here is a case of "the boy who cried wolf" (look it up if you don't know that fable).
    1
  21. Kenny you made a big mistake in this interview. You revealed you have access to AI shared to you with "private partners". Get a grip ffs
    1
  22. If Uncle Sam goes steady Iran builds more underground networks, gets better technology from Russia and then declares itself a nuclear power.
    1
  23.  @telebubba5527  Nah it was WW2 and the aftermath
    1
  24. There's a massive clue on your wall... Come on stop being so amateur.
    1
  25. CORRECT.
    1
  26. Yep
    1
  27. Explain how? Dancing peacefully in the desert was the real aggressive act?
    1
  28. Can you explain why you've taken a position in a bitter war thousands of miles away?
    1
  29. The problem with the eskimo is that he's the king of that environment and your survival is a matter that's at his mercy. So imagine you're in a spot of bother and you need the help of the eskimo. The eskimo saves you from starving to death, or from an aggressive polar bear. Now the eskimo call give you orders or threaten you with death. That's what happened with Sue Gray. She broke and bent rules throughout her career to deal with political opponents within the civil service (which has its own internal politics) on behalf of other people. She destroyed people as part of her job. It only makes sense to eat the eskimo.
    1
  30. I agree there's a problem but I don't like your solution. There are a million ways to sustain defunct and outmoded institutions at the cost of everything else. This is what we're seeing now.
    1
  31. How about "international terrorist"?:
    1
  32. Last time I asked a question like that (about someone else who mysteriously died) one of these types told me it was suicide and he'd always been depressed. I didn't believe him and kept pressing him, over months. So he introduced me to another guy. The other guy confirmed the story and added, the deceased had been haunted by a genie (I kid you not) and that's why he killed himself. No joke.
    1
  33. You should have worked with me Dom. You failed because you're actually bad at creating good teams.
    1
  34. It's an opium franchise. The UK is a very poor country surrounding a megarich city, and the country has no real influence except NATO and leveraging powerful allies such as the USA. The people in the UK don't even realise the Empire is gone. Thank the Bond franchise.
    1
  35. Where is this predicted?
    1
  36. Well I would arrest her for being sexy, and subject her to intimate searches.
    1
  37. He's right but none of your viewers will understand.
    1
  38. Blair
    1
  39. MI5 is roughly equivalent to SNL in the US. MI6 is more similar to Naked Gun.
    1
  40. 1:20:10 why did you mention this story Dom?
    1
  41. I have eyes and I have ears. You have a story. Your story is different from what my eyes and ears are telling me. You have physiognomy and an accent which betray your real origins. I don't know why you're bothering doing this. I thought the days of Bald and Bankrupt style recon were over. Waste of time. Stop lying.
    1
  42. The problem isn't that Iranian agents here aren't KNOWN. They are KNOWN. The problem is these guys (MI5) don't act. This may be (sometimes) because it conflicts with an MI6 operation. Not sure.
    1
  43.  @Heneling  The reason you're mistaken about conflicting operations is this: guy has to be sent to Iran or Russia to infiltrate and investigate. In order to do that he has to win the trust of the relevant groups. He starts on the ground in the UK and works his way up. In the course of doing so, he recruits a few thugs. Also, he takes other people along with him to endorse and give credibility to his back story (which involves him having sort kind of road to Damascus moment causing him to have Russian or Iranian ideology). Now, what happens to those low-level thugs and other randoms who accompanied him here and there and corroborated his back story? They're still in the UK, right. Meanwhile, people report the thugs to the police, and the "other" people who provided his background just by being there but who aren't in MI6 and didn't know this was all just a manipulation, grow concerned about developments in relation to Iran and Russia's activities in the UK. What's MI5 going to do? Let me see... I think they will ignore them, don't you?
    1
  44.  @Heneling  I'll give you a specific and related example: gang of guys challenging Wahhabi extremist ideology in the UK, with the help of a satellite TV channel supported by MI6, backed by a London-based cleric whom MI6 are directly running. They do so on the basis of Shi'ite theology. They deliberately rile up the fanatics. Among other things, they stage a "march" in a forest in the UK with that cleric at the head, and the others marching alongside - as if they were a sort of army. Nobody is going to be nicked. They are immune from everything. So where did the TV channel go? Into the abyss, no questions asked. Weirdo looney secret project...
    1
  45.  @Heneling  Dude, SIS doesn't publish information about how it operates on its website. If I have information about a guy who is at a high level in Russia, with deep links to Iran, and who has previously tried to recruit people to beat up an Iranian dissident in the UK (among other things), and MI5 doesn't want to know, then all I can conclude from that is that MI5 already know. And if they already know, then they've let him come and go in and out of the UK, in between Iran and other countries, and ply his trade here. Therefore, he must be their boy, or with an allied intelligence service. Otherwise, especially given this speech in which the actual operations of Iran and Russia are said to be a threat, they would definitely want to know. The same guy was involved with a UK-based satellite TV channel that was set up by some dodgy people and which arranged some spurious activities, notably filming a Hezbie-type march through a forest (in the UK). People don't get away with all this stuff unless they have immunity.
    1
  46. She's been doing that for decades.
    1
  47. That's very true. However, their goal is to influence or murder or bribe the hierarchy of an organisation. The hierarchy is detached from the hood and doesn't have the same nose for the weirdo pasties. The hierarchy understands things like elite schools and elite hobbies. They don't understand roast fish and cornbread.
    1
  48. Substance abuse. I spotted that in 3 seconds. Is there something wrong with your recruitment system perhaps?
    1
  49. An understandable pov. But if you're interested in this stuff you can literally follow the money and end up with Iran or Russia
    1
  50.  @malloryslife2972  The matter in this case was contempt of court. He was ordered to not publish the documentary as it was defamatory. He did it anyway, so he was called back to court for contempt of court. He pleaded guilty to contempt of court.
    1
  51. No such thing as entrapment under UK criminal law. The police are allowed to entrap anyone.
    1
  52. I think everything she says is a lie. I have ears. Definitely a Japanese accent hidden in her voice. Hidden, on purpose. Some kind of spy, I guess.
    1
  53. Good one! You should do stand up
    1
  54. They overrate their metadata information.
    1
  55.  @jaimepatena7372  My dinner was real. All my dinners have been real. If they had not been real, I wouldn't exist. Therefore, the world has real dinners in it. It is possible to grasp the world as it is.
    1
  56. The British people won't want a world in which Iran has nukes.
    1
  57. Entrapment is not a problem under the criminal law of England and Wales. The police are free to entrap anyone.
    1
  58. He is fiction. The Bond franchise is not an educational service brought to you by the BBC or something.
    1
  59.  @WEourKNIGHTED  Can you confirm whether she was installed as a senior manager at the Home Office (not the Cabinet Office) in 2002 or 2003? I had a run-in with her, I think. Definitely the face and the modus operandi were the same as hers.
    1
  60. He describes a real problem. What he claims to be doing about them is likely just propaganda.
    1
  61. I've come across many of them too, although I wasn't in the services. I wouldn't say they were all that ordinary. One dude, as far as I know, is still a foreign spy working as a translator for the Home Office.
    1
  62. Agreed that that's what will happen with Gray. However, Cummings was, initially, a believer. His plans went awry because he isn't as clever as he thinks he is. He's not stupid - he's quite smart. But not smart enough for that role. I warned him about his "weirdos" recruitment policy before he recruited Sabisky, and he ignored it. Cummings was smarter than an average civil servant but when above average people try to get too clever, they make serious mistakes. He's a follower of Tetlock and has a half-baked understanding of statistics and probability.
    1
  63. Nobody is above the law. And he pleaded GUILTY, so nobody should claim he's innocent. There's nothing innocent (or patriotic) about undermining and subverting the judiciary in the UK.
    1
  64. Bit different though as Iran isn't far from having everything necessary to build a nuke
    1
  65. It seems nobody knows what happened as it's being covered up by both sides. But I think it's safe to say not much happened. Probably by mutual (secret) agreement.
    1
  66. They should do a remake of the movie adaptation of Orwell's "1984". Hate hour with raised fist every day sharp at 2pm.
    1
  67.  @twig3288  He was lying. Telling the truth is a complete defence against defamation. For example, if you allege I molest animals and publish it, I could pursue a claim for damages against you. If you produce evidence and present it to the court showing the allegations are true, my claim against you will fail and I'll lose the case. What happened with "Tommy" was, he made up a completely unfounded (and damaging) story about a random boy, who then sued him for defamation. During the proceedings, the story was found to be untrue, so he lost the case and was ordered to pay damages. In addition to being required to pay damages, he was ordered to not repeat the allegations. He did so anyway, and was brought back to court charged with contempt. He pleaded guilty to contempt of court. It was all a pack of lies designed to rile people up.
    1
  68. It was always Iran but a lot of these spy types have a soft spot for Iran, big time
    1
  69.  @engjds  Yes
    1
  70. Not Mossad - Russian agent. I believe she did a promo for Ripple during the cryp0 boom a few years ago. Durov is said to be a "nomad capitalist" - Putin won't like him.
    1
  71. @AyanMohamed-g8z I agree she is likely to have been recruited by someone and was most likely a spy, not only because of Durov's prominence and importance as the Telegram chief but also because she's as mercenary as anyone - totally ruthless character. However, I'm not sure by whom she was recruited, and why. I don't think Durov is missed in Russia. I think it's actually convenient for Putin. Telegram is what it is - SHA256 is used for the "secret chats" option. France will want the unencrypted data which will still be incredibly valuable because of all the dumb-dumbs who didn't use "secret chats". As Telegram can still be used securely even with Durov in custody and being pressured, I think it benefits Putin (mostly) to have him gone. He allowed the oligarchs who were hunted post-Ukraine ops get picked off and their assets seized. OK, he didn't have much choice. But it must have been nice to have these Russian billionaires gone. What do you think? How does it benefit Israel?
    1
  72. Yes it's about Dugin's Fourth Political Theory
    1
  73. They aren't that good, for precisely the reasons mentioned in your comment (the pool they were drawn from).
    1
  74. It has lowered in the past 23 years.
    1
  75. It can intimidate people, e.g. someone breaks into your home, steals nothing, just trashes it and breaks your stuff. Leaves with the door wide open. Later on, at work, they let on that it was them.
    1