Comments by "David H" (@DavidHalko) on "Was Latin America Too Rich to Prosper? - VisualEconomik EN" video.

So, how do “Little People care about this stuff”??? 😂
4
@ArawnOfAnnwn - “they literally DID try to diversify”, using Crony Capitalism, which is another brand of Socialism, where certain peoples are favored over all / any peoples. As soon as you bring favoritism, cronyism, racism, etc into any mix… one brings future disaster. This is the poison pill of The Left, it eventually kills the consumer.
2
@returnnull3476 - I am sure men over 5’10” are also technically human, but the reduction of O2 as the height increases likely affects the brain in a negative way, as well… 🤣
1
@@Crying-Croc- “belt and road initiative” or bribing other nations to convince them to take out loans which result in them ceding land to China which China occupies with former military forces, colonizing those victim nations for mineral extraction… yeah… a few oligarchs get rich in foreign nations while Chinese oligarchs get to colonize the rest. Yeah, not a good model.
1
Latin America has the best opportunity, being so close physically & culturally to the US, over other nations. Middle East does not use Western Script & writes backwards… yet Venezuela could not capitalize on their mineral wealth with Western Script, being able to read-write from left to right, and holding similar religious. Far East nations did not use Western Script, had castle differs cultural faith systems, yet could capitalize on economic expansion… at a far greater distance than more local & more similar Americas nations. Nope. There is a reason peoples farther away, while having to overcome language & cultural disadvantages, and “too geographically distant” is not it. Not at all. Humanity is at the core of it all, and humanity is the secret.
1