Comments by "David H" (@DavidHalko) on "Ukraine's Invasion of Russia, What's the Objective?" video.

  1. 47:30 - “likely attack on substations were…” Russia did not want to destroy energy power generation infrastructure because they thought they would control it, early in the war. As the war drags on, as the Russian control of a robust Ukraine grows dim, destruction of high capital cost Ukraine power generation infrastructure becomes more likely, since there is no need to rebuild what they destroyed if they can’t control those pieces of the nation.
    1
  2.  @Silver_Prussian - “Europe nor the US can triple or double the aid unless they decide to give Ukraine stuff that’s currently in use” There is a lot of old Cold War stuff, that costs too much to decommission, that is currently in use. The point being, it is currently in use, not because it is very useful, but because it costs too much to decommission. Ukraine is the new Decommissioning facility, for 50-70 year old weapons, and it is better that more of them will be decommissioned north & north east of Ukraine in Russia. There is a lot more to give, especially from the US, more than what people can imagine. There are desert bone yards, as far as the eye can see, which can be harvested.
    1