Comments by "Reaper" (@Reaper-cm4jr) on "Does The 40 Su0026W Suck?" video.

@DigitalHaze65536 If you want to see an amazing temporary wound cavity, try the Underwood Xtreme Defender .40 S&W with the 100gr bullet at 1500fps.
1
@smartfreak7105 So let's compare Apples and Apples. As far as capacity goes, The Glock 17 with standard magazines holds 17 rounds of 9mm. The Glock 22 with standard magazines holds 15 rounds. That is a difference of 8%, Now if you were talking the difference between a Glock 17 and a 1911 with 8 rounds, OK there is a noticeable difference. But the difference between 15 and 17 is a non starter.
1
@smartfreak7105 And I also shoot the Glock 20SF. The reason for the comparison of the Glock 17 and 22 is that they are exactly the same size and use the same holsters. The Glock 20 is a larger frame which some shooters tend to struggle with where the 22 uses the same frame as the 9mm many are championing.
1
@Thumpr110 How can it "Close The Gap"? If "The New Bullet Technology took the 9mm from being an Unacceptable Cartridge (according to The FBI Testing) to being a good stopper, what did the same "Bullet Technology" do for the .40 and .45 which were already great cartridges? No gap closed, it stayed the same but the numbers just went up.
1
@devn3813 Not necessarily. The "Cheap" round you refer to is the downloaded 10mm which was loaded for The FBI (180gr at 1050fps) because a large percentage of Agents couldn't qualify with the full Norma Spec load (180gr at 1300fps). Many of the premium loads are offered in both velocities.
1