Comments by "Reaper" (@Reaper-cm4jr) on "How a single sentence in the Supreme Court's immunity ruling could upend Trump New York convictions" video.

  1. Naw, they don't want the Democrat names in that file to be revealed.
    13
  2. Guess what??? ALL Political Action Committees (PAC's) including THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE have 501(C)(3) status. So what is the problem if the Heritage Foundation is?
    7
  3.  @_Cetarial  Sure, but the implication in the post was that it would effect only Republicans.
    6
  4. Not if the case is thrown out on appeal. Thats how our Criminal Justice System works.
    3
  5. The Court ruled on an EXISTING LAW. So it isn't "RETROACTIVE".
    1
  6.  @ryanfraser167  No, SCOTUS interprets laws that were passed months and even years ago. That isn't retroactive.
    1
  7.  @brianhenriksen2660  We have MULTIPLE photos of Bill Clinton on Epsteins private jet with him. What more haven't we seen? But do you truly believe that if there was something that incriminated Trump it wouldn't have been "Leaked" months or years ago?
    1
  8.  @brianhenriksen2660  William Jefferson Clinton for one.
    1
  9.  @veilmontTV  But if he wins?????
    1