Comments by "Reaper" (@Reaper-cm4jr) on "Lawmaker reacts to Trump asking for 'equal time' at Jan. 6 hearings" video.

Wait a minute, how is that possible when according to the Democrats claim that the last election 2020 was "The Most Secure In History". What has changed besides the Democrats figuring out how bad they are going to be beat in the Mid-Terms?
2
Yea we would NEVER want to give the accused a fair shot at telling their side. As far as making the Jan 6 a mockery, they already did that by not allowing any Republicans on the committee other than the two who were Hand Picked by the Democrats. Democrats are on their way out and know it.
1
@Ewok751 And all of the members of the committee are Democrats except the two Republicans who were hand picked by Nancy Pelosi. So how about this Erik. Next time you are accused of something we have your accusers be the ones judging you? That sounds fair---- Doesn't it?
1
@Ewok751 I know. So how could that one be so secure and this next one is going to be fraught with corruption and outside interference? What changed in the last 18 months? It will be interesting though if when the Democrats loose in a LANDSLIDE if they "Attempt To Destroy Our Democracy" by challenging the election results where they loose. Any Bets?
1
@Ewok751 Oh but Mr Erik I am very aware of both of those concepts and there was plenty of both in the last election. Take for example California's mid term. They mailed ballots to every person over 18 years old in the entire state. So can you assure us that everyone who received one of those ballots was eligible to vote? And yes they were voting for Federal Offices so they are required to follow Federal Guidelines regardless of their state laws. Additionally states that allowed Ballot Harvesting. Would you be comfortable with someone who you did not know or did not know their politics delivering YOUR ballot to the polling location? Again my bet is no. So Erik please educate yourself as to FEDERAL VOTING LAW and not just the preferred method in the Blue State you live in.
1
@Ewok751 Except California admitted that they sent them to EVERYONE over 18 who had a Drivers License. And No, California DOES NOT require proof of Citizenship to get a Drivers License. So Erik, again I will ask how you can assure us that all of these people who were sent a Ballot were LEGAL VOTERS? Additionally California does not require ID to vote. So how would anyone know who they really are as well as allowing PROVISIONAL BALLOTS. Additionally Erik I will be interested to see if you still believe in the sanctity of the voting process when your beloved Democrats loose the number of seats they will be loosing this fall. My bet is not.
1
@Ewok751 Really Erik. Is that how homeowners in California (Several of whom I know personally) were sent multiple ballots for former residents that had not lived there in over 10 years? Yup Erik that's just "Right Wing Propaganda---Right?
1
@Ewok751 OK and you prove to me that every single vote cast was legitimate. You don't have access to California voter rolls and neither do I. So your claim that it was legitimate carries no weight since you have absolutely no proof whatsoever that it was. You are going on assumption and what a DEMOCRAT Secretary Of State told you. .
1
@Ewok751 And neither have you my friend.
1
@Ewok751 And yet that is reality that lives only in your own little world.
1