Comments by "Mark Pawelek" (@mark4asp) on "The physics anomaly no one talks about: What's up with those neutrinos?" video.

Hilarious manipulation. I question the existence of neutrinos. Someone calls me out, and I reply. The callout is highlighted by Sabine, but my reply is trashed into the waste. Here's my reply again. What evidence is there for neutrinos? What experiments / observations show them? How many validation experiments/observations do physicists believe are needed for us to accept these ghostly "particles". What would be a suitable falsification experiment / observation which will convince Sabine that neutrinos are fictional?
1
The issue with neutrinos is there aren't any. Why does physics need fake particles?
1
@maxv9464 What experiment, or obsevation, in physics demonstrates the neutrino? As I see it the neutrino was introduced to balance a maths equation. Making it about as real as the crystal sphere view of the solar system.
1
@maxv9464 One validations experiment. What falsification experiments and observations have been tried?
1
@maxv9464 1. If the detectors all work on the same principle they are the same validation experiment; repeated many times. As I see it, you really several different experiments - detectors working on different principles. I assume these detectors are NOT detecting every neutrino. Suppose the detectors only detect one in a billion, then how can you say what they detect is a neutrino? If you had a detector able to detect all the neutrinos which impact on it - I'd concede your neutrino.
1
@maxv9464 I think a falsification experiment should be designed as such; in such a way as to satify a particle physics skeptic - should any such people exist. If no such people exist, particle physics has some serious problems.
1
@maxv9464 We do not deny gravity because gravity is a THING. So we plausibly have a graviton, or gravity wave to explain it. What THING does the neutrino explain?
1
@maxv9464 No other particle explains what? You gave no description of any experiment nor observation. Do you really think the magic words "neutrino detector" suffice to convince me? I'm not the only skeptic of the orgy of speculation which the so-called "standard model of particle physics" seems to be. Nice to see you're now taking lessons from climate modellers by naming critics of speculation: "deniers".
1
@maxv9464 "Climate chage denial" <- What do you know about how climates change? Do you know a fraction of what I know? Have you considered you may be the real "climate change denier" here? Don't wonder into a debate about evidence unless you have it (evidence). The problem with neutrinos is: no one can explain why we can't detect ALL the neutrinos (they expect to find), nor can they explain why ONLY A TINY FEW can be detected - why are they special?, nor why they're not detecting some other anomaly instead. In circumstances such as that asking for multiple experimental validations is conservative - not denial at all.
1