Comments by "Mark Pawelek" (@mark4asp) on "We're Done With Caring About the Environment" video.

  1. No really. They put that "climate change" note on EVERY video which mentions climate change or climate science. Every single one. What Simone says is wrong. She has no sophisticated climate science understanding. "Environmental Management" is not science. Simone parrots globalization, green activist and UN agenda. Where are we today? We/re warmer than the Little Ice Age of a few hundred years ago. Slightly cooler than in the 1930s. Cooler than the Roman Warm Period and several degrees cooler than the Holocene Optimum of ~ 8000 years ago. Heat & cooling of the earth. The atmosphere is a blanket which keeps earth warm. Heat is lost slowly - not by radiation but by convection. The atmophere is much thicker closer to the surface. Radiation does not predominate until the stratosphere (20 km up). The globalist climate gaslight - AKA greenhouse gas effect - is a lie. The lie is designed to make us fear fossil fuel emissions. It applies a bad heat loss model which makes heat loss all about radiation. Radiative heat loss is very fast (speed of light). But earth obviously does not cool that fast - so they possit vast backradiation in their models to counteract the vast radiative heat loss - they suppose. By making earth's cooling ALL about radiation, they conned you all. Actual heat loss is mostly convective in the lower atmosphere. The 3 methods of heat loss convection, conduction, and radiation vary with temperature and atmopheric thickness. In the thick part of the atomsophere - closest to the surface : the troposphere - convection dominates. In the thinnest part of the atmosphere : the stratosphere and above, radiative heat loss dominates. Midway between the thickest and thinest layers of our atmosphere conductive heat loss dominates. This is NOT how the "greenhouse gas effect" works. It is a broken model. The greenhouse gas effect does NOT describe the reality of our atmospheric behaviour.
    2
  2. In the last "ice age", AKA: major glaciation (about 20000 years ago), at one stage atmopheric CO2 fell to 180 ppm. That's barely enough for plants to live on. At 150 ppm most plants will die. During that glaciation, widespread desertification was experienced all over earth, Rain forest extent fell to only 10% of its current extent. BTW: there is no greenhouse effect. CO2 does not warm earth's surface. It does not make earth warmer - the sun does. CO2 does boost plant life. The idea of cutting CO2 is a gaslight. The elites have you where they want you - terrified of plant food ! - and bigging up their deranged geo-engineering agenda. Environmentalists are truly evil people. Carbon sequestration: Is insane. There is a carbon equilibrium between oceans and atmosphere. The ratio of carbon is about 50 : 1; with more atmosphere in oceans. So when CO2 is added to the atmosphere, it will predominantly ( 50 : 1 ) dissolve in oceans; and stay in oceans. In the ocean, CO2 reacts with carbonate to make bicarbonate. Most ocean carbon is bicarbonate. So: a carbon sequestration will - in the long term - REMOVE carbon from oceans! <- Insane! Oceans have about 38,000 Gt of carbon. The mass of oceans is about 270 times greater than the atmospheric mass. So the carbon in the ocean dominates longterm. Adding Iron to oceans stimulates growth of plankton, which is fish food.
    1
  3. What toxic chemicals would those be? Can you name some of them? No. I didn't think so. Environmentalists have you terrified of ghost chemicals - you can't name and aren't even sure are there.
    1