Comments by "Mark Pawelek" (@mark4asp) on "TalkTV" channel.

  1. The issue is their: 1. clothing 2. language 3. how they present themselves. 4. actual narrative in the story It may be OK, provided parents give written permission for it; but even so I would still have reservations. Explicit parental provision for this is the minimum I'd accept.
    8
  2. These banks are probably all being run by Tories - which may explain why they're shutting their critics down.
    7
  3. Please report his name.
    6
  4. Parallels between this and the Islamic groomer gang scandals are remarkable. Both happened because "political correctness" enabled it. Politicians enabled both.
    4
  5. Banks don't have rights. People do. Banks have privileges.
    3
  6. Men should not compete in women's sport, because men are born with a different genetic makeup - which leads to different bone and muscle development. This leads to men being physically stronger and faster. As Sharron reveals in this interview. Transwomen are men. They are NOT women.
    3
  7. Upheld, not "respected". "Respect" is part of the language of identity. Making everything Identity is the problem.
    2
  8. The best response to a form such is, not only, to not complete it but to explain why not - by writing over it with something along the lines: "there are only 2 genders. I refuse to complete your nonsense form - designed to gaslight and F---wit patients. This waste of NHS resources disgusts me"
    2
  9. The world is no more nuts than it was 5 years ago.
    2
  10. Radio 4 removed many of their best shows and presenters, to be replaced with ? I'm an ex-Radio 4 listener. I don't know whether the ? new stuff was all "woke". It probably was. It was certainly irrelevant to me. By the time I stopped listening to Radio 4, Tom Hartford was the only remaining presenter, from 7 years ago whom I still wanted to listen to. All the other greats, and their shows, had been culled; presumably for not being woke, or yout enough? The degeneration in the World Service was even worse.
    1
  11. Why are you interviewing these anti-human maniacs "Just Stop Oil". How about interviewing their critics as well?
    1
  12.  @anthonymorris5084  Critics who agree with the main premises of "Just Stop Oil" ? I would not call such people "critics". There were no hard-nosed critics along the lines of: "we cannot drop everything and dance to the tune of every eco-loony psychopath"
    1
  13. Is Julia Hartley the only journalist with balls in Britain?
    1
  14. What next: "Playboy Story Hour"? Sexy women in stilettos and skimpy outfits teaching todlers the art of seductive shimmy and the relative price of a backstreet B-J compared to a night in a top Mayfair pleasure spot?
    1
  15. What an annoying man. How conceited is he?
    1
  16. "listen to one of these people speaking about something that moved them" <- would I believe anything they tell me? <- do they believe it?
    1
  17. "Oppenheimer was a bit of a lefy" <- So much so, that in the 1930s, the US Communist Party held meetings in Oppenheimer's home.
    1
  18. Suppose somebody believed they had a demon in their head which was destroying their life by thwarting everything they try to achieve. Perhaps they might conclude that medical treatment to exorcise the demon is required? Maybe a surgical procedure to remove part of their brain might do the trick? Should we allow people to self-diagnose as demonically infected? Should such people be able to demand a lobotomy, for example, to make them happy, and fulfilled?
    1
  19. Grant Snapps strikes me as the kind of bloke who'd con his own grandmum if his bosses incentivized it. I don't believe a word of his drivel.
    1