Comments by "Mark Pawelek" (@mark4asp) on "The Real News Network" channel.

  1. But NPR is ideological garbage now. How do the left explain that? Wasn't NPR supposed to be the golden standard for objective news? What is "the left" anyhow? When I listen to the Left all I hear is controlled opposition = whatever billionaires want to tell us.
    1
  2. Wikipedia has this to say about TRNN: "TRNN does not accept funding from advertising, governments, or corporations - it is sustained through donations from viewers and foundations, and has a small for-profit segment." <- But these foundations are all created by billionaires, such as Rockefellers, Gates, Soros, and dozens of others. Isn't TRNN controlled opposition too?
    1
  3. Humanity is not at risk of extinction. Because carbon emissions are NOT harmful, there is no greenhouse effect, back-radiative forcing is a lie, and the climate crisis is hyperbole, or lies (if you prefer). Q: How do I know that? A: The notion that carbon emissions, CO2, and methane are 'harmful' is based on the idea that they are greenhouse gases which warm earth by means of back-radiation, AKA radiative forcing. So the eco-extremists tell us this 'heat', or man-made warming will kill us one way or another. The radiative forcing idea itself depends on the idea that earth's surface is predominantly cooled by emitting (infrared) heat. For example, the IPCC say that 95% of earth's surface cooling is radiative, the other 5% of cooling is conduction/convection. But that IPCC claim is a lie. In reality: 0.4% of earth's cooling is due to radiation cooling, and 99.6% of cooling is conduction/convection. Were earth predominantly cooled by conduction/convection. as it is, the back-radiative warming of earth ('global warming' and 'climate change') vanishes. Evidence: See Tom Shula Interview (recommended): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NS55lXf4LZk White paper: https://tomn.substack.com/api/v1/file/e69c101b-e8df-4067-aae3-010608fbfbff.pdf
    1