Comments by "Daniel Larson" (@daniellarson3068) on "Econ Lessons" channel.

  1. 158
  2. 54
  3. 54
  4. 46
  5. 34
  6. 32
  7. 28
  8. 28
  9. 28
  10. 24
  11. 22
  12. 21
  13. 19
  14. 18
  15. 17
  16. 17
  17. 15
  18. 15
  19. 11
  20. 10
  21. 10
  22. 10
  23. 10
  24. 9
  25. 9
  26. 9
  27. 9
  28. 9
  29. 9
  30. 8
  31. 8
  32. 8
  33. 8
  34. 7
  35. 7
  36. 7
  37. 7
  38. 7
  39. 7
  40. 6
  41. 6
  42. 6
  43. 6
  44. 6
  45. 6
  46. 6
  47. 6
  48. 6
  49. 6
  50. 5
  51. 5
  52. 5
  53. 5
  54. 5
  55. 5
  56. 5
  57. 5
  58. 5
  59. 5
  60. 5
  61. 5
  62. 5
  63. 4
  64. 4
  65. As usual, I think this guys is mostly right. My dad was no economist, but he and I used to argue about it. I was young and argued that the world was black and white, good and evil. etc. My father told me the world had a lot of grey in it. The phrase, "There are no absolutes," comes to mind. Economics teaches us about Land, Labor and Capital. I think these Academics in their ivory towers often ignore the most important variable, people. People make or break an economy. "Anything that government can do, private enterprise can do for half the cost." - Milton Friedman He was one of those ivory tower guys. (There are no absolutes.) I see the public roads, public school, parks, municipal utilities and yes the post office as government successes. I don't think private enterprise can do these things as well. The right combination of government and private enterprise gives success. Milton Friedman once had a television show. It was called, "Free To Choose." It was back in 1980. The TV show often showed the success of Hong Kong. Hong Kong is Chinese. They were very successful. All of China was very successful from 1980 until recently. It was their government policies that allowed their success. The Chinese have a long history of free enterprise. They were allowed to use that experience to be successful. I'm just saying not to count China out. When the Chinese see something isn't working, they are smart enough to change it. The Chinese CCP wants to succeed. They can change. The combination of government policies and hard working Chinese can make great things happen.
    4
  66. 4
  67. 4
  68. 4
  69. 4
  70. 4
  71. 4
  72. 4
  73. 4
  74. 4
  75. 4
  76. 4
  77. 4
  78. 4
  79. 4
  80. 4
  81. 4
  82. 4
  83. 4
  84. 4
  85. 3
  86. 3
  87. 3
  88. 3
  89. 3
  90. 3
  91. 3
  92. 3
  93. 3
  94. 3
  95. 3
  96. 3
  97. 3
  98. 3
  99. 3
  100. 3
  101. 3
  102. 3
  103. 3
  104. 3
  105. 3
  106. 3
  107. 3
  108. 3
  109. 3
  110. 3
  111. 3
  112. 3
  113. 3
  114. 2
  115. 2
  116. 2
  117. 2
  118. 2
  119. 2
  120. 2
  121. 2
  122. 2
  123. 2
  124. 2
  125. 2
  126. 2
  127. 2
  128. 2
  129. 2
  130. 2
  131. 2
  132. 2
  133. 2
  134. 2
  135. 2
  136. 2
  137. 2
  138. 2
  139. 2
  140. 2
  141. 2
  142. 2
  143. 2
  144. 2
  145. 2
  146. 2
  147. 2
  148. 2
  149. 2
  150. 2
  151. 2
  152. 2
  153. 2
  154. 2
  155. 2
  156. 2
  157. 2
  158. 2
  159. 2
  160. 2
  161. Your videos make people think. I do believe the factory of the past will remain in the past. PLCs and robotics will continue to automate much production. The backbreaking work of my grandfather will be limited. Those that manufacture and build will learn better ways to manufacture and build. With manufacturing before our eyes we will look to make it better. This is where technological progress comes from. It comes from this incremental improvement. One learns by doing. Do we want these technological innovations to come from the USA or elsewhere? Do we want to be dependent on products produced abroad? Do we want to produce the value added products here or ship raw materials abroad? Do we want that freedom to choose? Mr. Biernat spoke of people choosing to be artists. How can people choose when they work two or three low paying jobs to just survive? There are towns in the Midwest that are essentially ghost towns after manufacturing left. There are few choices for the people in those towns. There is little money to be spent on the art of John Adams descendents. Manufacturing, building and mining can provide good paying jobs for people to support families. The wealth of the nation is built from this labor. Trump may not be right in his policies but the idea of returning manufacturing to the USA will provide opportunities for engineers and artists. Unemployed and underemployed people are a waste of the biggest resource in the nation, the people. Domestic manufacturing will return wealth to the United States. This wealth can give additional choices to the people. Comparative advantage does not work when you have the choice of near slavery abroad doing the work versus having to hire free men to do the work.
    2
  162. 2
  163. 2
  164. 2
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. 1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. 1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. 1
  201. 1
  202. 1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1
  220. 1
  221. 1
  222. 1
  223. 1
  224. 1
  225. 1
  226. 1
  227. 1
  228. 1
  229. 1
  230. 1
  231. 1
  232. 1
  233. 1
  234. 1
  235. 1
  236. 1
  237. 1
  238. 1
  239. 1
  240. 1
  241. 1
  242. 1
  243. 1
  244. 1
  245. 1
  246. 1
  247. 1
  248. 1
  249. 1
  250. 1
  251. 1
  252. 1
  253. 1
  254. 1
  255. 1
  256. 1
  257. 1
  258. 1
  259. 1
  260. 1
  261. 1
  262. 1
  263. 1
  264. 1
  265. 1
  266. 1
  267. 1
  268. 1
  269. 1
  270. 1
  271. 1
  272. 1
  273. 1
  274. 1
  275. 1
  276. 1
  277. 1
  278. 1
  279. 1
  280. 1
  281. 1
  282. 1
  283. 1
  284. 1
  285. 1
  286. 1
  287. 1
  288. 1
  289. 1
  290. 1