Comments by "bighand69" (@bighands69) on "Response to Mick West Debunking | David Fravor and Lex Fridman" video.

  1. Mick West has no points. He simply is way outside his area of expertise. He is a games programmer let's stop pretending he is an expert in aviation or flight systems. How would you feel if people started to debunk professional football but never played it before or do not know the rules of the game. Most fans would say that is preposterous.
    11
  2.  @martinw245  Sorry but saying that Fravor is not an expert in avionic systems is beyond a joke.
    9
  3.  @user-ue8vp6fy8y  Mathematics? He does not have all the data present to make such mathematical calculations. Playing and making video games does not make a person an expert in aviation systems. He needs to stick to games.
    8
  4.  @lederse  His mathematical applications and models do not prove anything. They lack model resolution and are a set of assumptions that are not based on technical systems analysis.
    8
  5.  @martinw245  He is an engineering graduate from Naval academy. And is top gun and works on the calibration of flight systems. And you think he is not an expert on the system? There are no engineer that knows every aspect of a system. Those flight systems require multi disciplinary teams. The develop of such systems involves whole divisions of research and can cost hundreds of millions and even billions in development. So are you talking about a design engineer or maintenance.
    7
  6.  @user-ue8vp6fy8y  So what data has he to suggest that the object is at 12,000 feet above sea level, what evidence does he have of the mass of the object, temperature, distance from observation, angle of observation or data from the operating condition of the observation craft? So has he carried out extensive analysis of energy emission from the observed object to correlate its relationship in terms of temperature and radiation wavelength. I am doubtful that any any waveform analysis of Stefan-Boltzmann Law and its impact on systems observation of the black body was carried. Most of these skeptics are way outside their comfort zone.
    5
  7. None of it has been debunked. Most of those that claim they debunked it are nothing more than fools way out side their own circle of competence. Claiming it birds or insects is being childish with an over simplified world view. Some of them need to go back to making video games and writing articles for porn mags.
    4
  8. It is not a bird. It is stupid to even suggest such a thing unless they are trying to claim it is a dead bird that was in a fridge before hand.
    4
  9.  @SakowskiStudios  Imaging and weapons systems are designed to compensate for distance, angles and speed. It would be super natural to express that a bird would present some sort of ability to outperform such a system unless you are suggesting that the system is not operational?
    3
  10.  @rmcfly2933  My god you are encouraging me to take Drugs? (I was raised in a literal machine).
    2
  11.  @FreddyonAcid  Fravor could earn a lot more money working in aviation than he could being out giving interviews.
    2
  12. No he is a former pilot who witnessed something. There is video evidence as well and their is data as well. And multiple witnesses. There was government inquiries and a media release on the topics. So stop with your stupid jokes.
    1
  13.  @SakowskiStudios  So what is the exact speed of the object?
    1
  14. I do not believe that it is beings from another planet but at the same time the analysis by the debunkers is less believable.
    1