Comments by "bighand69" (@bighands69) on "Why Some See Web 3.0 as the Future of the Internet | WSJ" video.

  1. Web2 is not an exact technology and is more of a philosophy.
    2
  2. I do not think Dorsey is correct on this. Web3 is more complex and futuristic than people imagine.
    1
  3.  @Anonymous_Lee19  No Lee it is not that. These are not my own views nor are they my own desires but just an explanation. The idea of the tokens/crypto is to take some of the financial power that corporations currently have and to have it distributed into the market place. The idea is that a user can take those tokens and use them to build on the net without the need for corporations to providing funding. So an enterprising user could build an organisation that could purely be constructed from those tokens. Every user will have access to those tokens. The key here is to understand that it does not mean a user will not have access when they have no tokens but if that user wants to trade or build they will require them. We also have a plug in our thinking hole in that we cannot imagine such a system with next generation technologies such as vr and ai. What exactly would such a world be?
    1
  4. It is confusing because web 3.0 and web3 are two different things.
    1
  5.  @generalralph6291  Such a concept is either going to intersect with ai or it is going to happen after the ai break development of the web.
    1
  6. Web 3.0 is not the same as web3. Web 3.0 is a set of loosely canonized protocols that would run web services. Web3 is an idea of decentralizing the internet. They are two different things to be honest. We are currently at a crossroads in terms of what direction we go in. Either the internet/web will become more centralized or it will go down the decentralized road. Both will have advantages and disadvantages.
    1