Comments by "bighand69" (@bighands69) on "USA TODAY" channel.

  1. Better to keep the visits extended.
    5
  2. +tetryl1 The all committed an act that resulted in a person's death. The moment they entered that house they put every person in that buildings life at risk. Why you would really side with criminals that caused a death is strange at best. I bet you come from europe and do not understand that property owners have a right of self defence.
    5
  3. The home owner could have died in that confrontation as well. When somebody breaks into your home you have no idea what their intentions are. Anything could happen when such a scary situation happens. People react in all manner of ways.
    2
  4. The media with the supreme court are now going to suck the air out Joe Biden's campaign.
    2
  5. Is that paster not real? I think I seen him somewhere else.
    2
  6. +Lusion I think you are all missing the point here. It was their actions that caused that death. By breaking into the home they put their own lives at risk and the occupants of the home life at risk. The guy would not have died if they did not break into the house. The shooter now has to live with that for the rest of his or her life. They already have a life sentence because of what happened. Every noise around the house will be terror for them.
    2
  7. Nobody would have died if they did not enter that house. It is that simple. There actions caused a death. They should all be facing at least 20 years in jail for their actions. Murder was probably not the correct charge or conviction.
    2
  8. +Mathew Cooper The moment they break into the house they put everybody's life at risk in the house including their own and the occupants and first responders. Things can escalate very quickly in a break in which is exactly what happened. The occupant of the house has no idea to the intentions of the person breaking in. They have already broke in so how far are they willing to go in their crime? You get up out of bed and see some stranger in your home but it is not just one stranger but several. You have seconds to make a decision that could cost your life and your families life. All of those criminals are really responsible for what happened. It was they who caused the home owner to kill somebody. Do you think it should be the home owner who should get a life sentence with the guilt of having killed someone.
    2
  9. Eric Baker I never mentioned race. Only you have brought up race. Your race baiting was so intense that you could not avoid reverting to race in your argument. The facts are that violence in Ghettos both white and black is at extreme levels and their reliance on welfare is at near to 100%. But again you as a race baiting practitioner are more interested in a Flag.
    1
  10. That was hilarious. I know I should not be laughing as I find the pastors opinion extreme but it was funny to watch. I think the interviewer was about to burst out laughing at one point.
    1
  11. They are over there forming trade deals.
    1
  12. +Joe Wilson The owner has the right of self defence. The moment they caused a break in is the moment the owner has the right of self defence. Why you would side with criminals is really strange.
    1
  13. +Front Lines Radio Their actions caused the death of somebody and risked the lives of everybody in that building including the occupants. Could you imagine if a young seven year old child walked into the middle of that. It is alright saying they would not do anything but that is what they are saying after the events took place. Anybody willing to break into a persons home and invade their private space is capable of anything. There has been countless cases of gang rapes with breaking and entering crimes. The home owner has all of that going through their head as it plays out.
    1
  14. At the end she and the child should have court martialed. No elmo for him.
    1
  15.  @ZunamiRevert  There actions led to a person death. It was not an accidental death such as a car accident. It was a violent crime.
    1