Comments by "bighand69" (@bighands69) on "Moore's Law is Not Dead (Jim Keller) | AI Podcast Clips" video.

  1. What do you mean they are not doubling every two years. That is a very vague statement.
    3
  2.  @korbandallas8931  Neil DeGrasse Tyson is a philosopher and he probably would need an engineer to translate.
    3
  3. I am afraid that it is you that does not understand what you are talking about. Let me guess you actually believe that transistors are 2nm is size. Out of curiosity do you believe that 2nm transistor is volume, area, radius, diameter or something else?
    3
  4. Moore's law has absolutely nothing to do with the size of transistors. It is about the number of transistors that are in an integrated circuit. There is a lot more space down at the bottom than people realize.
    2
  5. It is not just the M1 chip architecture it is all the other architectures as well.
    2
  6. AMD are nowhere near Intels level and really have grown because they attached them self to budget chips and the growth in mobile computing.
    1
  7. How is it dead? The number of transistors on integrated circuits has gone from 16 to 48 billion in a 60 year period.
    1
  8. Nope it is still functioning.
    1
  9. In terms of the production price.
    1
  10. We are nowhere near the limits.
    1
  11. We are nowhere near the end of Moore's.
    1
  12. Transistors are not 2nm in size. That is a marketing figure that makes no sense.
    1
  13. Because he knows that transistors are not at 2nm and does not want to go down that route.
    1
  14. Moore never predicted the power of computing. He was talking about the number of transistors on an integrated circuit.
    1
  15. That is nonsense.
    1
  16. It is answering it based of data it finds not an actual real prediction.
    1
  17. Moore's law is not strictly about density but was about the number of transistors that can integrated onto a circuit. It does not stipulate the size of the circuits, topology or geometry of integrated circuits. Intel chips went from producing 1 million transistors to producing about 48 billion in about 30 years which is a doubling every 2 years.
    1
  18. Moore's law has nothing to do with clock speed.
    1
  19. Moore's Law is about the number of transistors present on an integrated circuit. It is not about the size of the transistors nor does it stipulate the type of architecture being used. If you take the number of transistors on the first generation integrated circuits and calculate that against the top chips today in 2023 you will see that it has doubled every 2 years producing about 43.6% growth every year. The reason why computing power is doubling every years is due to the fact that computing power is more than just Moore's law.
    1
  20. It is a very relevant observation. The number of transistors that a integrated circuit can have is important but it is not the other factor in computational power. I think people are confusing computation with the number of transistors.
    1
  21. TSMC are not at Intels level and people that think they are just have no clue.
    1
  22. Moore's law has nothing to do with speed.
    1
  23. That has absolutely nothing to do with Moore's law. Moore's law is not about the feature sizes either that people keep bringing up.
    1
  24. Sorry but Moore's law is not about clocking speed or even impedance.
    1
  25. I will let you in on a little secret transistors are not at 2nm in size.
    1
  26.  @Nuclearcx  It is not even about the size of the transistors that people have bought into. I find it ridiculous that people think that transistors are actually 2nm in size. Now they do not stipulate if it is volume, area, radius, diameter or some other metric which makes it even more vague.
    1
  27. Moore's law has nothing to do with shrinking.
    1
  28. The brain is not a quantum computer.
    1