Comments by "bighand69" (@bighands69) on "Tucker reacts to video of UFO confirmed by Pentagon" video.

  1. @Charles Xav You can you explain who to capture a clear image of objects that are traveling at 50 million miles per hour at altitudes from a few kilometers to several hundred kilometers. How can we easily capture an image of something that is at 2 million feet elevation?
    34
  2. That is not a strobing light so stop with the stupid comments.
    6
  3. The events of the last few years have no bearing on observation of objects over the last several thousand years.
    4
  4. No idea what you are talking about.
    2
  5. Any Civilization that is capable of traveling interstellar space would not need to use humans or earth as a lab. Their technology and science would be so advanced that there is nothing they would not know about us.
    2
  6. Such objects have been witnessed by humans for thousands of years. They have been discussed by ancient civilizations.
    2
  7. They are saying swarming so that people can get the message and there is more focus on the issue. Very few people actually aware of any of this.
    2
  8. Nobody knows not even the governments of the world.
    1
  9. Presidents feel uncomfortable because it is an issue that can be used against them very quickly.
    1
  10. Objects have been observed for thousands of years. No body knows what they are.
    1
  11. The videos were leaked years ago.
    1
  12. Why is he a big tool. Can you explain?
    1
  13. Those cameras are the best that exist for capture video of really complex objects that can be travelling from a few hundred miles an hour to several million miles per hour.
    1
  14. The government has been losing control of this. The david fravor video is from almost 20 years ago and was internet boards for well over a decade.
    1
  15. It is not the same thing though. Many things have mistakenly been observed as a UFO but that is not the same as the military being confused about certain observations. And if we are to believe there is suppose to be far better footage on record.
    1
  16.  @fordfairlane662dr  The original comment does not in any way expand or make sense.
    1
  17. The reason they are saying it is a threat to national security is to try and get more interest in the topic from a sensible point of view. Otherwise it will just get ignored.
    1
  18. Viewing objects on the ground is easy not so easy for a moving object in the air. Go out with a camera and try to photograph birds flying in the sky to see how tough it is.
    1
  19.  @cameronweaver1270  My point is that it is difficult to capture an object moving in the air. It could be miles long or a few inches in size. That is the reason why there are not a lot of good photos for these issue.
    1
  20.  @Zyzzyyx  Any civilization that is capable of travelling interstellar space would have computation far beyond anything we could even imagine. They would have models of every single human on earth right down to our molecular makeup. They would understand the structure of every human brain and exactly what is happening. Such a civilization would have mastered nucleosynthesis meaning they could create every element on the periodic table. They would be capable of building planets and stars. All human science and brian power would fit in one of their stamp sized devices.
    1
  21. US aircraft have followed them before but with little success. These objects are moving hast 50 million miles per hour. Just think abou that.
    1
  22. That blinking effect is not navigation at all.
    1
  23. It will have no impact on the election. The moment the media proposed who won was the moment it was over.
    1
  24. You need to understand any civilization that is advanced to travel interstellar space already knows we are here. They could from the stars analyse our atmosphere and know what is here. Such civilizations could actually have probes at every start in the milky way. Such a civilization could build new stars and planets.
    1
  25.  @mattgotsskill  My point is simple it is hard to actually capture unidentified aircraft or phenomena. While 8k cameras work very well in controlled situations they are not capable of capturing complex sightings. If we are to believe some of those "craft" can move at speeds up to 50 million miles per hour. Take out a camera and try to photograph a bird flying high when you are out some day doing something. When objects are slow and controlled and you have time it is easy to capture that image but not when they are moving fast and you have a few seconds to get the image it is difficult. Sky objects are also complex due to distance and having nothing relative to compare as background.
    1
  26.  @jasonjoyce7504  No they are not Chinese as they simply would not have the capability to do such a thing. The Chinese can hardly operate within their own airspace never mind carrying out such complex operations.
    1
  27.  Robert Gonzalez  What makes you think it is an assumption?
    1
  28.  @Hardradi-hkh9596skp  At those potential speeds it is very complex. But I am sure they are not all flying at 1 million miles per hour.
    1
  29.  @John_Hoover  A high speed large object would cause complete confusion to the observer. Military grade observation systems are engineered to account for these issues a normal camera is not. ascertain
    1
  30. That is what cutting edge cameras are. It is night vision systems that are designed to operate in relation to difficult conditions.
    1
  31. But why just the US. Why not other countries as well.
    1
  32. It is complex to try and capture clear pictures of objects in the sky. Go out and try and photograph a bird flying low to see how easy or hard it is.
    1
  33. These objects have been observed for thousands of years.
    1