Comments by "bighand69" (@bighands69) on "CBC News" channel.

  1. "power Germany had" Germany was dug in and had the defense position as well as supply lines. The British realized very quickly that it was no use trying to attack German positions. So they did what any great general through the ages would have done they pulled out and returned by home with some 400,000 men. That they then sent back to Main Germany and kicked the Nazi's buts. Germany lost end off.
    24
  2. The movie was about the evacuation and not about a battle with the Nazis armies.
    12
  3. +Earl Woodley Both names are on the ticket. She will have an impossible time trying to prove that there was an agreement. And why hell would she put somebody else's name on for good luck. You would not do it with your life insurance or Mortgage.
    10
  4. Worse still would be a child in the backyard.
    2
  5. It was a very good film but I feel it took a little bit of liberty with history. There was things in the movie that simply did not need to be there for it to be a great movie. These little things subtracted from the movie and in my opinion stopped it from getting a 10 out 10 score. As it stands I would give it an 8 out of 10 and there has been no other movie in the last year that I can think of that gets an 8 out of 10 score.
    2
  6. If she renounced it after becoming a senator then it makes no difference.
    1
  7. I do not agree with cannabis smoking but what would people expect of a government run system.
    1
  8. If the west shuts its consumer market off to China who exactly is China going to produce goods for?
    1
  9. How about answering the question.
    1
  10. Liberal MP served as a lieutenant and probably in good conscious could not allow things to travel on their current pathway. It is still nice to know there are people out there in this world that have a moral compass.
    1
  11. It does not matter what he blasts if the US closes the western market to China that is all that will matter.
    1