Comments by "పక్షి భితి" (@user-pakshibhithi10) on "Understanding Chinese Civilization." video.

@g729 No, he doesn't know much about India. He speaks about India a lot, but, he is inaccurate many times.
3
@g729 Like, in this video itself he said that India is a mix of Harappans, Dravidians and Aryans. That means, he is saying that Dravidians and Harappans are different. Many historians and linguists think that Harappans are Dravidians, but this person differentiates both. He also once claimed that the people of Indus valley civilization had majority Dravidian genetics (which is true) and the ruling class had majority Middle-eastern genetics (which isn't true). First things first, no archaeologist has found a "ruling class" in IVC. Because, almost all of them lived in identical houses and no palaces or forts were found to differentiate the ruling class from others. Main-stream historians say that India is a mix of Aryans and Dravidians. But, this person says Dravidians and Harappans are different and claims that India is a mix of Harappans, Dravidians and Aryans.
3
@ajithsidhu7183 Again, in this video itself, he said that each caste in India is it's own ethnic group. Which is just wrong in many ways.
3
@ajithsidhu7183 According to a survey. Southern India has about 31% OCs (upper castes) and Northern India has about 27% OCs (upper castes). And, Northern India has higher lower castes than the South, especially Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Haryana and Punjab, about 25% of these states are SCs and STs and in the South it's only 21%. If you don't believe me. Google, percentage of upper caste and lower caste in Indian states. You will get the results for individual Indian states, then, group the stats according to regions.
3
@ajithsidhu7183 Jaw line doesn't come from genes. Wtf? Every physically fit person has a sharp jaw line. As for facial features difference, yes. We southern Indians have bigger eyes and broader noses. I do have a broad nose. I'm an upper caste but I don't look like North Indian people. That means, upper caste Southern Indians are Dravidians not Aryans.
3
@ajithsidhu7183 No, then why does South India have more upper castes? Also, all of North-Western Indians, i.e, Punjabis, Hayanvis, Jatts etc (even lower castes) have more scythian and Greek blood than upper caste Telugus or Tamils. Just look at the facial features and skin colour of Lower caste Punjabis, Hayanvis and Upper caste Telugus and Tamils. Upper caste Telugus and Tamils are darker than Lower caste Punjabis and Haryanvis and don't have scythian or Greek facial features. But, Telugu and Tamil Brahmins are lighter skinned. But, other upper castes are Dark skinned. I'm a Telugu Kshatriya, I'm Dark-skinned, my whole family is wheatish Dark-skinned. The thing is, we've not done enough genetic survey in our country.
2
@ajithsidhu7183 What studies? That is a survey done by a Government agency.
2
@ajithsidhu7183 What is the meaning of "u davadrians were are nit u stop using the flawed studies its only done.by 1 group small of.people not the whole of India". That is like a paragraph written by a 3 year old 😂😂 BE MORE CLEAR!
2
@ajithsidhu7183 People with 50% greek genes means one of their parents are greeks.
2
@ajithsidhu7183 The percentage I gave is from a mainstream history study only. There is a mainstream historian who is a Youtuber. It's not an alternate history Channel. He debunks all the alternate history claims and only talks facts. That channel's name is "World of antiquity".
2
@ajithsidhu7183 Who tf is stealing your Heritage?
1
@ajithsidhu7183 I can't read all your comments. Don't swear in your comments. YouTube will delete it. You will see your comments in the comment section, but, YouTube will delete it. Others cannot read your comments. After my "What studies? That is a survey done by a Government agency." Comment. I can see only one comment of yours and that is "with an agenda". So don't swear in your comments like a child and reply carefully. Otherwise I won't be able to read your replies.
1
@ajithsidhu7183 Are you even understanding what I'm saying? You are asking why North Indians look like Iranians and Greeks. It's because you people migrated from there to India. You people retain those features.
1
@ajithsidhu7183 I'm saying that Indus valley civilization was a Dravidian civilization and India is a mix of Dravidians (Harappans) and Aryans. Not, Harappans, Dravidians and Aryans. Because, Dravidians and Harappans are the same.
1
@ajithsidhu7183 Harappans were a mix of Dravidians and Iranian farmers, but, those Iranian farmers are not the same as today's Iranians. Those were different, and their genes are mostly prevalent in today's Indians, not Iranians. Today's Iranians came from Central-Asia just like North-Indians.
1
@ajithsidhu7183 No, Harappan genes are still more present day Indians. Southern Indians have more of the Harappan genes. Northern Indians also have majority Harappan genes, only 30% of Indian genepool is Central-Asian nomads (Aryans, Scythians and other non-civilised people). Greek genepool is much lesser, because, only a few number of Greeks came into India during Alexander's invasions, they weren't numerous enough to change North-western India's genetics. Scythians did have a bigger impact than Greeks, but, they also didn't change the genetics of North-western India as a whole. Because, they also weren't numerous enough and their genetics into North-western India came through conquest, they eventually assimilated, but, at the start they just r@ped the local North-west Indians and spread their genes.
1
@ajithsidhu7183 Did they take a genetic test?
1
@ajithsidhu7183 Also, I was talking about India's avg. Not your family's genetic makeup. You people may have had some recent greek ancestors. Or, your family didn't mix with other Punjabis with less greek ancestry since 3000 years, this is unlikely, so, either you are lying about your 50% greek genetics, or you have a recent greek ancestor.
1
@ajithsidhu7183 Also, I was talking about all the non-Harappan genes, when I said 30% Central Asian and European genes. Not 30% greek genes. Greek genepool in India would hardly be 1-2% (only in the North-west). There is almost no greek genetics in other parts of India.
1