Comments by "పక్షి భితి" (@user-pakshibhithi10) on "The rise and fall of the Mughal Empire - Stephanie Honchell Smith" video.

  1. Wasn't Nader Shah Persian?
    22
  2.  @aaronTGP_3756  So, was he a Persianised Turk?
    18
  3.  @nenenindonu  Okay, thanks for the information. I don't know much about Turkic and Persian history. I just assumed that Nader Shah was a Persian because of his title 'Shah'. I thought that title was only given to Persian Kings.
    15
  4.  @Mahdyar_071  When Nader shah was ruling, Persians didn't have a state of their own. Turkic people had.
    2
  5.  @Mahdyar_071  The name "Iran" existed, but the nation didn't. Just like how India and China existed for thousands of years, but, they became countries in 1947 and 1949 respectively. Before that they were empires and kingdoms.
    2
  6.  @Sarmachar126  Same thing, now don't be like erdogan
    1
  7.  @Sarmachar126  Being upset with the english version of their country's name is common b/w you and erdogan
    1
  8.  @Sarmachar126  But, Persians are the majority in Iran. And, Farsi (Persian) is the official language of Iran. So, it just means that Persians are ruling over other minorities, that's it.
    1
  9.  @Sarmachar126  That means whatever ethnicity you belong to doesn't have a state of it's own.
    1
  10.  @Sarmachar126  At that time there were no nations in Asia. It was a kingdom/empire. Whichever ethnicity rules the empire has the state, whichever ethnicity doesn't have a kingdom of their own doesn't have a state.
    1