Comments by "Gavin Mc" (@gavinmc5285) on "'Huge risk’ of war escalation in Middle East as Iran and Hezbollah promise ‘serious’ retaliation" video.

  1. What do the I-R-G-C [🇮🇷.🇷🇺.🇰🇵.🇨🇳.] all have in common? They have surfaced in the G.W.O.T. (Global War on Terror) as states that claim sovereign protections whilst simultaneously and outrightly rejecting the principles of sovereignty. Why are the I-R-G-C different from other sovereign state powers? Aren't the states of The West also hypocritical in their dual standard application of sovereignty? Yes, many Western states and also many other non-aligned states all over the world reflect contradictions and inconsistencies. Nonetheless, on an 80-20 balance of probabilities they mostly get it right, especially over the long term. The I-R-G-C vanguard take particular exception of the c.20 however and are prepared to go 85-90-95-all in on fighting and avenging their enemy (as they see it) Is it just the I-R-G-C? Not at all. Each I-R-G-C component has its own set of network and proxies. What marks the I-R-G-C members out is their status as regimes, i.e. as international warlords that seek offensive means to achieve their visions. What do you mean by regimes? They are typically led by men that cannot leave power and are trying to install themselves as lifeterm parts of the institutional furniture having served a minimum of ten years in dictatorial buildup.
    1