Comments by "Gavin Mc" (@gavinmc5285) on "Watch again: David Cameron questioned by foreign affairs committee" video.

  1. commons?
    2
  2. no🥜
    1
  3. yes, minister.
    1
  4. eight x three
    1
  5. potentially peachy
    1
  6. vimto: enjoy it with ice or as a hot drink
    1
  7. based on the historic responsibility of hussein's betrayal...
    1
  8. pasta shells
    1
  9. doubt such trivialities are a concern for hamas
    1
  10.  @THEE_Kisywisy  was there really sexual violence planned? so how would that work? really. isn't it more likely that violence (murder and bloodshed) was planned and that sexual violence would have been an implicit or accepted feature of that planning? maybe you didn't mean to present it as such but the idea of planning sexual violence would certainly be something that even a modern terrorist 'army' (in the loosest sense - figuratively and metaphorically) is not conventionally known for.
    1
  11.  @motinmotin8591  i'll give the quiz a go 1. fundamentally - unlikely. discretely - probably. 2. if you ask state of israel - no. if you ask 'state' of palestine - of course. 3. first, depends on your geographical definition of 'occupation'. if yes then israel has the right to defend its sovereignty (as a state) even if the un (united 'nations') doesn't fully endorse (or takes issue) 4. how long you got? in the interests of brevity then probably best to benchmark at the fall of the ottoman empire. so depending on your perspective in the context of the modern sovereign state - 1914, 1917, 1922, 1945, 1948, 1967, 1973, 2001, 2023. or another year. 5. genocide? - no. although given the increasingly elastic politicization of the term if you were representing a particular set of interests in some random place, i dunno, let's say south africa, then yes. 6. if you take a broader sweep of history (say 100 years) and look at the land that the state of israel now occupies (as legitimate custodians obviously) then it is difficult to deny that the so-called 'palestinians' (the majority inhabitants of the lands c. 1917-1922) have not been displaced, compressed and have lost land to live on (actual and potential) 7. to an extent. although as middle eastern states go it could be worse. 8. hamas is an oppressive non-state terrorist network disguised as an outward facing resistance group and an inward facing pimp government 9. oh, this one is easy. britain issued the mandate.
    1
  12.  @motinmotin8591  thought i answered. yt musta grabbed it and i didn't screenshott it
    1
  13. lifestyle choice
    1
  14. the lord is not my master if the lord tries to laud
    1