Youtube comments of Gavin Mc (@gavinmc5285).
-
106
-
92
-
63
-
45
-
37
-
33
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
basic minimums (or equivalents)
nurses in training £15 ph (£17.50 in leeds, london, manchester, bristol, brighton, liverpool or birmingham - or other country equivalents)
trained nurses £20ph (or £25 as above)
contracts for staying - eg. disincentives to get trained and then go private or leave.
incentive structures within employment - long hours, long service, support recommendations, patient service (eg. food and drink vouchers, accommodation, shopping vouchers, holidays, ppe, clothing)
basically - why is nursing a below minimum threshold profession? clinicians, senior doctors and surgeons wouldn't accept it so why should nurses?
no one notices until the system breaks. what have the Conservatives been doing with the free market since 2010 to ruin the NHS? it's the opposite of genius - negligence at best. evil genius at worst.
14
-
14
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
you don't have to pursue an already popular agenda to be a populist - that would be a follower not a leader. Mr. Farage (who's name - unless i'm wrong - rhymes with carriage not barge) clearly has appeal, is clearly clever, knows how to play games, knows how to wind folk up, knows about agenda-setting, understands business, money and is a strong communicator. and yes, probably has common person principles, decent standards and is more than likely an overall good bloke on a personal level.
me, i just don't like (what i see as) his Russian-style moseleyish oligarchical-like fascism by stealth. he's the right-wing equivalent of Mr. Corbyn - a political limpet on the hull of the good ship democracy. they're there, they're going nowhere but if they could they would spring a leak. in as much as i don't like much of what he says i would still defend his right to say it although i would also look to fight or pushback if he were to deny me equivalence especially if the trumpian mentality of shut em down rose to power in what is effectively harnessing dimensions of arrogance, exceptionalism and double-standards (known or unknown) that instinctively i have reservations about.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@Mast3r0fTheUniverse way i heard it is that he was advocating a janus-faced position for the USA: one face looking internally at domestic matters and one face looking outwardly to the international Cold War arena. and he was warning against isolationism because the responsibilities for the USA, both home and abroad, were too great and too finely balanced to risk abrogating. Which would be a duality yet not inconsistent.
Whereas MAGA v.1 has been isolationist in theory yet Pacific facing in practice. It has been domestically bias in favor of the 'poor' and has promoted a 'we can do it ourselves' mindset particularly with respect to manufacturing and production. and all those are MAGA positives, things that the MAGA movement have done well. the fact that BBB (Build Back Better) imitated that is flattery to the MAGA cause. good job.
and Nixon was pre-Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, pre the War on Drugs, pre-Star [S.D.I.] Wars. yet he was seeing oil and gold exchange, was seeing the early fruits of the electronics boom, and himself, Kissinger and the post 9-11 crew also had their eyes trained on the Middle East and Asia.
At the risk of digressing into the tangent of a rabbithole, if there is one lesson that can be drawn from the two American excursions into Iraq (91 & 03) it is that the PMC (the private military contractor) had a renewed vigor that could absorb way more problems than the State could (for better and worse). the UK didn't learn that lesson upfront - unfortunately.
The reason i'm introducing the PMC to this is that the PMC was born in part from the legacy and (homebound failures - a domestic inability to satisfactorily accommodate veterans effectively) experiences of South-East Asia, Vietnam being at the top of the list. Vietnam, as we know, was as much about the PRC (call it dominos or whatever) as it was about anything else, including the Soviet Union.
MAGA and the militia system are not nothing. And during the first decade of the 21st century it was observed that a very American coup had taken place at the heart of the USA. The rise of the corporation and corporate power relative to the state and the call on the state's monopoly of violence from PMCs is not unique to the USA. Yet the USA has always and consistently pioneered a belief in market economics - sometimes for the best, sometimes less so.
In the sacrifices that MAGA are (clearly) prepared to make on behalf of the USA, Nixon's denial of narrow isolationism could serve as a guide for wannabe warriors that have not ticked the boxes of necessity and proportionality. It's all very well buying into the dreams of made men or folk that have never known anything other than opulence but - so far as the higher echelons of power go - it's not their blood they're offering up, it's those they can afford to let or make fight. So that their bloodshed can be saved.
Yes, Communism was a threat to freedom. Yes, Communism is a threat to freedom. However Nixon (regardless of partisan details) shows that the dignity of statesmanship and the appeal to higher principles of state and the foundations of sovereign order are (especially at a global macro ethic of statecraft) way more preferable than the mademan crime philosophies and strongarm leanings that currently seem to emanate from the MAGA wing. Of course, i could be wrong.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
this is what happens when you're in the wrong, everybody knows you're in the wrong even if they back it or can take advantage of you being in the wrong, but for a whole host of reasons too numerous to even start with, you double down, triple down, quadruple down on your wrongness, cover it with rubles and then start tunnelling, drilling and trying to shoot your way in as a way of justifying that being wrong will ultimately lead to being right and that the more wrong you commit to, undertake, endorse, support and condone, the greater the eventual victory will be and the greater your legacy of greatness in history will become.
in the meantime you become that guy that becomes part of a children's fairytale because parents don't want their kids to grow up like you. not because they fear you, just because you're wrong.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
adapted from O. Stone (fb statement March 2022):
The USA has wars on its books - past and present - but it still doesn’t justify Mr. Putin’s aggression in Ukraine. A half dozen wrongs don’t make thirteen. Russia was wrong to invade and is wrong to continue. It's mistakes include -- 1) basic geopolitical overconfidence, 2) international conceit of arrogance, 3) inflated ego of confused hubris, 4) underestimating sovereignty as an organizational principle of international relations, 5) underestimating the pariah status effects of isolation, 6) overestimating the power of lies and propaganda outside its sphere of fear.
So, how could Putin have saved the Russian-speaking people of Donetsk and Luhansk? Institutionally? Nope. In resolution and mediation? Nope. Through aid, charity and internationally backed intervention? Nope. Through responsible statecraft and genuine best foot forward efforts? Nope. Ah, ok, well then terror, brutal repression, murder, license to rape and abuse, pillage and decimate then. That must be it.
No doubt his Government after 2012 could’ve done a better job of showing Russia and her peoples how to better generate a sense of opportunity, possibility and optimism in their aspirations. Only ten years of suffering had to occur before Ukraine got the full brunt of the abuse that had run from Moscow through Crimea and even as far as the American White House. Nothing anybody really cares about anyway.
It’s now later than they think. Putin has taken the poison that tastes good from the tree in the middle of the international relations garden and still refuses to acknowledge or potentially concede a mistake. With a state and a corporate military now committed to an everly intractable looking void the white rabbit soon cannot find time inside the rabbit hole of its own design. What a state of affairs. There seems to be no road back, now only one belt and one road forward. Or out.
Hawks, vultures, jackals - all seem potentially interested if not actively engaged already. As Khrushchev handed Crimea to Ukraine and Cuba to JFK so Putin seems to be giving Ukraine to Europe and the other thirteen CIS states at least a fighting chance of breaking from the Russian yolk. Yet, chokeholds or not it is clear that as the mud gets murkier and the swamp deepens the continuation of at least some back-channel negotiations remain. What is the price to bring these to the fore?
The great unseen tragedy at the heart of this history of our times is the ever failing dissolution of hope that a sufficiently peaceful partnership between Russia and the U.S. might have been. With a PRC vs USA clash also looking ever more likely the quest for earth's supremacy card continues. Unfortunately, when power knows no bounds and opulence is treated as relative poverty a reality check might be what is needed. So far, that check has failed to materialize.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
hotel bills, travel expenses, bribes, contracts, deals, fine wines, seafood platters, private airtravel, hostesses, room service, extracurricular activities...
for everything else there's regular media reporting
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@TheJacketify yet even if true then the politicians have to play both sense and the popular vote at least. and as such present their arguments or manifesto commitments as intelligent and rational ways of appealing to baser instincts. whilst also maintaining the demands from their own baser instincts in public view. and ensuring that the interests of those from which they base their power are respresented without being unnecessarily or overly exposed.
also, i agree with the draw of ego - yet only when it comes to the role of political 'leaders' or figureheads. the ego of narcissism can act as a public mirror which can in turn draw those that submit either to the principle of the greater sin (a way to cover their more minor transgressions), a figure of entertainment (an attention honeypot), a business magnet (profit), an international symbol of strength (power projection) or a focus of ambition (driving copies, clones, wannabes or aspiring equivalents). all, each or any combination of the above are able to catalyse voter imagination. dynamism, marketing, promotion, narrative and an appeal to the baser insincts cited can then be used to engage operationally.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
parallel dynamics to the 2011 uk riots that followed the shooting of mark duggan but on a bigger scale. alot of the revolutionary violence will be stemming from a dispossesed (whether actual or rationalized) and angry youth that understand more than they are given credit for, are frustrated at certain incumbent elite power structures, have a powerfully collective sense of global injustice, may or may not be networked into crime by association, choice or circumstance, may or may not be institutionally criminalized, may or may not be opportunists and will - obviously - be angry.
where the conventional system infrastructure does not or cannot provide, where the brutality of the state response is a challenge of or for violence, where the opportunity to literally smash (or smash at) 'the law' is easy and escalatorily permissive, where disorder, vandalism and violence look strategically appealing, where pent up frustration that can't vent just explodes...
the rationalizations can be endless: exlcusion; racism; israel-palestine; war on terror; war on iraq; regime change; eye for an eye and so forth. more than likely it reflects a demand for systemic change or overthrow of an order with either the full knowledge or implied knowledge that the authority of state is not a peaceful entity that can be overthrown peaceably. the nature of the violence is revolutionary in intent even if the execution might fall strategically short of a viable goal in practical sustainment terms.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
delivering corruption, coverups, conspiracies, denials, offshore accounts, non-domiciled status updates, cause for suspicion, confusion and barefaced lies. plus privatization, significant profits, hidden expenses and arms sales. as well as kowtowing to certain usa factions, double-counting, fraud, terror and other white-collar crimes.
delivering babies on the other hand - labour. with some minor construction roles to boot.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Nicoleshinski understanding why someone hates is pretty much a waste of time beyond a point. understanding how someone hates is probably of more useful merit in addressing how to address that hate.
if the projection (which is what almost all antizionism is - there may be some legitimate exceptions but they will not be the rule and i wouldn't want to offer up reasons for here) is 'shame' or [insert negative projection or brand of hate here] then it is invariably going to remain unexplained, will more than likely be unwarranted and only serves the ends of confusion, more problems, or worse.
how to hate is a class in no love, no forgiveness and bitter animosity. anything that can be used to rationalize that and reject acceptance, understanding, tolerance, compromise and instead select violence (sexual and | or weapon-based, intimidation - threats - or other coercive means beyond what dignity can accept as justifiable, legitimate, necessary and proportionate) is a way of perpetuating an endless cycle.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
so Mr. Putin has basically bet the entire federation of the Russian farm on supporting domestic terrorists in eastern Ukraine (obviously now formerly annexed by the Russian Federation). great move. how's that looking?
the 143 million Russian peoples need look no further than the Kremlin if they wish to submit their lives to a collective Darwin award for international stupidity in the name of hubris to be presented to the enemy of Pussy Riot, scourge of the Western NATO aggressors, joy of the matrushka gilfs, IRA pioneer, Kursk apologist, Chechen stoker, prosecutor of poisonous palace-loving upstart anti-corruption nationalist, eliminator of Siberian mayoral football owner, friend of MAGA, admirer of patriarchal repression, unforgiver of Cold War loss, denier of sovereign state reality, evil genius of tactical manipulation, American helicopter tourist, long table sabre rattler, opulent isolationist, kowtow bff of third term regimist and Wagner wannabe...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
both.
the presence of a footprint can act as a deterrence in the sense of containment and a reminder in favor for the principle of freedom of navigation, against any policy of monopolistic territorial acquisition (land, sea or air) and as a defense against prospective, potential or actual incursion.
on the other foot, the growth of a military-based presence has the potential to scare, incite, trouble and instigate conflict, particularly if:
a. the received perception of another power's containment policy or balance of power build-up is deemed oppressive, restrictive, dangerous, threatening or challenging;
b. a counter-policy of aggressive action (e.g. applying military clarity to Taiwan) is deemed 'necessary' for the survival of [insert rationale] due to the growing hegemony of [insert target].
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
britain (particularly mainstream political britain - i.e. conservative and labour) is such an awkward place at times.
why? no ending cruelty, repressive sexual innuendo, hidden affairs, faux pas', things you should have done or shouldn't have done, guilt trips, favours owed, purility masquerading as sophistication or class, money or class masquerading as virility, business interests, secrets, power holders, power hungerers, scandals, and clearly - wait for it - total wrong uns.
letby, savile, the wests, serial killing in britain or extreme sexual deviancy on a really disturbing scale only crops up every few years - maybe five, ten, but it does crop up. in various cycles that shift and even overlap. then it gets buried (metaphorically) and retreats (at least from the media eye). politics as well in britain is really a 60-30-10 'nation' (four countries, one state and a very messy history): 60% Conservatives, 30% Labour and 10% others.
living in britain though is like being stuck in the land of the 49% - at best. can never attack (know your station) from 50% (unless you sign up for the armed forces at 51%) and if you drop under 49% then you are free to sink further until the welfare (increasingly the well unfair) state kicks in at under 40%.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
is it fair to guess that JT the OG probably didn't really know the value of the documents he put up in Discord? if so, he probably didn't really know the value of his work - that would suggest a training issue as well as a lack of clear boundaries issue, especially when it came to the penalties for leaking. if so, that is also an institutional problem. access to the information is only the tip of that iceberg.
a few 'ifs', granted yet then the representation from MAGAreps is also a reflection. that kind of freak out is 'ok' so long as it is a stick that can be used to beat the enemy (Democrats) with. again, mass shootings are a form of freak-out (mental health) intel (gun) leak (bullets) that (collectively as patterns) are witness to an obviously growing trend inside the USA (uneasy, imperfect, reluctant and flawed international guardian of liberty and security) to either turn in on itself or search for an enemy (obviously all roads - eventually - lead to the PRC)
another explanation is that the OG Discord leaks are actually relatively benign and that OG the leaker is just the information cup that has 'spilleth over'. that actually there are way more sensitive things out there, that his clearance level is actually at the bottom of the infobarrel and that we really (as global citizens or regular folk inside the USA) have no idea and mostly lack relevant context as to what sorts of rights and responsibilities our freedoms are being traded for on a daily or more long term basis.
so let's say (hypothetically of course) that ''OG' J. Terra' was an unlucky flush of a system he tried to exploit for personal gain, largesse, status, props or egoboosting and that it's better all round he did it at 21 than at 38 (when deliberacy coulda spelt even higher risks than schoolboy errors make - remember A. Ames?) it's likely he coulda just been 'seduced' by the worldwide web - sad to say. and if he was going to betray then it's a sucess that he exposed himself earlier than later.
what be just as concerning then - in the context of fake news, real life corruption, crime, artificial intelligence, the general state of the human condition, transhuman transitioning and civil-military fusion - is if he had the sort of impact that meant his actions woulda really sparked something. which leads to the conclusion that maybe the U.S. is so information-rich it can afford these mistakes - as well as make media hay from it.
plus - all the info that comes from comments and opinions like this across all the networked effects of these leaks. someone must be benefiting even if the profit is in bits and bytes not dollars and yuan. and back to MAGAreps, if someone is on the house intel comms etc and is essentially a paid Rep stooge to attack and snipe the other party from any vantage point possible then everything is fair game. as it seems to be being run like that - as a game. unless you get 10+ years in jail. then you will need your playstation. and a hard drive to boot. or reboot. unless it's been corrupted.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Crouchy232323 i wouldn't know but if you're holding up an organisation that is consistently and regularly accused of repression, oppression, indoctrination, of sponsorship, financing and support for a host of nefarious activities, and is basically like a million strong plus legitimate (or legal) mob with international connections to terrorism and organised crime under the name of an islamic republic that claims jurisdiction over c.85m, links to at least ten major networks in the ongoing GWOT, ties to Russia who are seeking to escalate the GWOT to sovereignty levels, and have an intolerant rule of fear in policy application...yeah, he might have an axe to grind, i don't know.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
global civil war
- tech (scaffolding)
- four titans (industry)
- fame (status and recognition)
- credit (banking)
- known knowns and unknowns
- negatives (trans | pro | pluses | )
- search (pull)
- offer (up)
- trans (flip) > reverse
- A-pop (edm) : rap and roll rock (blues)
- tariffs, terrors, terra, (acquisitions)
- billy graham model
- teens, tech, tao, ties, tai, thai, try, take, trillion, then (20th) - see xi bow to compare recent elon salute
- where (nowhere)
- bro ken barbie (bbq)
- dad's army (immigrants welcome in public)
- stop the boats.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Dear Prime Minister,
It is with great joy that I learnt of your Home Secretary winning the tender to become the new Rwandan Minister for Immigration. I cannot continue in my abject disappointment of your government's broken record knowing that such strong disagreements have now cleared the path for a direction of purpose that enables the twin track double standard on illegality to bear financial fruit.
As we all know, you have been pushing the public's limit of patience, acceptance, tolerance and reasonableness by seeking the strongest possible piece of emergency legislation your government can achieve so as to ensure that the exploitation of Africa under the newly planned Rwanda policy can begin with as many small boat scapegoats as we can muster - using swift or not to effect our deterrence calculus for many generations to come.
This obviously stems from the UK's firmly held position that the small boats crisis can only be stopped by creating a national emergency of untold damage to our country. The only way we will be able to stop the boats completely is by urgently introducing this major new deterrent: consistent advocacy. A new nuclear peace could seriously enhance our opportunities to block domestic and foreign courts as well as giving us novel ways to undermine the effectiveness of opposition policy.
One of the great advantages of our unwritten constitution is we Conservatives can do as we please so long as the unfettered power of our sovereign to create law is not a power that we don't continue to take full advantage of. Your government has a responsibility to place your personal interests above vital national interests and also above highly contested interpretations of international law. This has been a tradition since at least 1997 and should be now well-established and in our discussions on the legislation you have moved somewhat closer. So thank you.
Nevertheless, I am unable to take the current considered plan through the back channels discussed as I do not believe it provides me with the best possible chance of success at your hands. It is kind of you to propose to sacrifice me for your own triumph of hope over experience yet the stakes for the country at large are too high for us all not to consider the wider ramifications of your ego and the endless merry-go-round of financial challenges which you are prepared to risk on everyone else's account. This raises doubts to your intent and ultimately only acts as a deterrent factor on reflection.
Between home and the office, I am nonetheless proud of you and think your team have started well on the so-called improvements you want to deliver for those of you that are together working alongside other dedicated and capable civil servants. Agreeing to most of my five-point PPE plan to reduce our ability to deliver on promises was also a sly move but one i can still learn from. This package must be delivered immediately via a special operational rules change and accompanied by significant brexit reforms at the start of a new party year to ensure we meet your elevenses manifesto commitment with gusto.
Every single Conservative MP elected will then be able to abandon the petty trivia of housing, public services, economic productivity, welfare reform, community cohesion and, more fundamentally, what little trust there is left in democratic politics. Let's all make a serious effort to keep the primary school ethos focus of your government. At least then we can progress to a common understanding small boat percentages and Italian period pains.
The deal we negotiated with those two-faced eagles has given us illegality beyond our wildest dreams. The demons of Rwanda can now act as a powerful reminder. For the first time we have developed a comprehensive disruption strategy to organise our immigration crime gangs in expensive holiday resorts spanning Italy, Belgium, Bulgaria and Turkey. This has made the United Kingdom tourist industry a partner of choice to those who share our determination to tackle the haters and make record numbers of fans attend our popular gatherings irrespective of danger. This could have a ten-fold pull factor if we could eliminate the legacy backstop and actually start generating a profit from asylum hotels.
Behind the scenes we have also instilled greater firefighting measures and our under the counter visa applications for asylum claims shall continue to slow all other necessary progress. Yet we did want to stop the boats altogether so why do we not drift out into the channel together and do 'whatever it takes' to deliver this commitment? This is not our last opportunity to prove this, but in its current drafting it is clear that we cannot go far enough to remain friends that do not drive our boats apart.
With strong head assistance you have kept the helm and helped show the country how far leadership on the world stage in the UK has fallen. You've also done much to improve the lives of millions of citizens across the United Kingdom by continuing the sad legacy of all the Brexiteers that deserve much greater recognition. This is obviously not a conclusion I arrived at in Kigali, but one born of principle and tragedy after careful consideration and many months of trying to convince you of the failure and pitfalls of your position.
You will retain little or no support on your illegal Rwanda policy and your intersecting challenges of generating cooked book economic growth whilst pretending to solve the housing crisis and improving immigration are unlikely to wash for much longer. The fortunes of the Conservative Party are in your pocket.
It has nonetheless been an honour to be on an island that your government claims and of my five favourite Conservative Prime Ministers since Churchill you are definitely in the top twenty. I will continue to represent your financial interests even though they seem somewhat at odds with the wider interests of the UK constituents to whom you claim to owe so much.
Yours occasionally,
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
is deterrence against russian first use whilst still reserving the right to use against the kremlin if regime change has to be enforced whilst simultaneously manouevring the entire non-negotiable russian federation elite rump into a position of surrender, retreat or submission a question of time over the ability of the strategic mistakers to escalate in terms of rearmament, new production, international support (prc, iri, dprk, any new takers for a violent means based new world order) or resistance to internal pressure (palace coup, navalny, pussy riot, oligarchical strikeback, duma resistance, popular uprising, hostile takeover)? or is there more to it?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
🇷🇺hi, how are the tests going?
🇰🇵hmm, ok, not great, how about ukraine?
🇷🇺i don't wanna talk about it. are you open for business?
🇰🇵sure, come on down
🇷🇺ok, see you soon
✈96
🇷🇺👣
🇰🇵good flight?
🇷🇺yeah, my favorite hostess 🫂
🇰🇵ok, let's get down to business
🇷🇺wtf! I didn't want a giant portrait next to you
🇰🇵come on, you know how we do
🇷🇺ah ok, hey man, you know halve of those 10k crates were duds
🇰🇵man, our supplier in china didn't come through for us so we had to rely on juche industries again
🇷🇺ok, but your main man is back linked up again for network exports?
🇰🇵yeah, no doubt, plus we got your back for the war on sovereignty. after that fat orange twat betrayed us the usa can do one
🇷🇺no doubt, if we gave you an icbm or something could you send a message to hollywood?
🇰🇵easy. but check out our propaganda vid, its got nukes hitting every major us city
🇷🇺haha, no way, ours too
🇰🇵this is so cool, we'll be on the right side of history kicking off this new worldwar
🇷🇺you know we can't pay you via swift anymore
🇰🇵what about bitcoin or uranium?
🇷🇺potentially although we don't wanna run this through the ledger as it's a private equity family transaction
🇰🇵oh yeah i forgot our status isn't really legit
🇷🇺who needs legit when you got nukes? you gonna do it yeah? set it off like we agreed?
🇰🇵no doubt, i'm on this. united states of anonymity, let's turn 9-11 nuclear
🇷🇺my man!
🇰🇵no, i'm your supreme leader
🇷🇺jog on, you do as you're told
🇰🇵i'ma tell xi on you
🇷🇺go on then
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@6mins: 'he's got nothing'. that's pretty big news since if that is confirmed it would explain why he's so desperate and now getting so vicious. he might actually need the presidency to clear the tax, sex and sedition scandals that he's embroiled in and he knows if he doesn't get it he's done in more ways than one. so because he doesn't wanna be flipping burgers at 79 he's on a one shot one kill and then if he does win he's at the mercy of the rock of big business interests and the hard place of MAGA. either way, as an individual, it doesn't look good. either way (win or lose) he's being made an example of. yet at the same time his lust for power just seems to grow exponentially. his desire is insatiable, desperate, insulting, undignified, rambling, incoherent, obtuse, demeaning, disrespectful and offensive. way to go.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
demographically of course 'white people' have a long-term reproductive issue - since one side of colonialism's economic successes, feminine empowerment, gender equality, technological advances and cycles of 'slavery' is a lowering of birthrates.
it might be that russia's current toys out the pram is a bit of a freak out at this danger. and china too has a set of demographic problems, not least the one caused by a glut of males generated in the one-child policy program era.
india and africa are in rapid growth mode with the latter due to grow the most worldwide in the second half of this century. that's more mouths to feed, more energy in demand, more opportunities and more potential problems (as with all population increases).
meantime, united states problems come in part from a reconsideration of the mix. more and more people speak spanish, less and less people will accept slavery (from narratives through concepts to policies or agendas), more and more people are questioning authority and less and less people accept even the principle of taxation without proportionate and adequately fair and high standards of representation. particularly beyond entertainment in the context of basic liberties and amendment rights.
plus the global oligarchs are forming - some have tech power, some have financial power, some have resource power, some have political power, some have military power.
as well, 'black' and 'white' are generic descriptions. to call an individual black or white in an assigned sense is quite different from talking about a population calculus over bigger numbers - at the risk of veering tangentially into statistical analysis.
there's a lot of fear about these days and there's also a lot of poverty (which itself is not necessarily economic). there's also a lot of temptation (especially where choice forms). as there is a lot of stuff that could have the potential to inspire a lot of jealousy or envy or wickedness or hatred. often depending on who is communicating what.
because if your hatred of someone is at core the color (or colour) of their skin it might be worth checking whether that color first off is actually 'a color' and second whether 'that color' actually represents what you think it means - particularly in the context of freedom of speech. because if freedom of speech the way some folk use it were the same as the right to bear arms then there would be no repercussions for deploying a firearm against people that had done you no wrong nor wished you no harm. which would kinda be a strange way of going about the conduct of one's standing in a community. because to act with impunity does not necessarily confer impunity. especially once reality comes crashing that fantasy (whatever it was) down. whenever it happens and however long it takes.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Political pressure (Kremlin), military violence (with internal repression) and population suffering (Russians and Ukrainians) are interlinked. the more pressure the Kremlin is put under the more violent they become, the more suffering they inflict, the more pressure they get from sanctions, the more they funnel to violent solutions, the more suffering they impose, the more isolated they are, the more militaristic they become, the more their power hardens, the more their targets die, the more their pariah status grows, the more their retribution tactics get normalized, the more the focus of their aggression has to absorb and withstand, the more their gratuitous malevolence increases, the more the suffering spreads, the more their echo chambers echo, the more their rationalizations find common acceptance, the more they justify their crimes, the more they loop their methods, the more they perfect their killings, the more they seek to intimidate, humiliate, mock and impose fear, the more they torture and lie, the more embittered and desensitized they grow, the more oblivious they become to pain, the more they think they are right, just and true, the more that they are actually wrong, in the wrong and just becoming two-bob good-for-less-than-nothing wrong'uns.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
processing complexity of the new global order from the cold warriors ultimately responsible for the new global order doesn't look fully on point wherever the sovereignty lies. the media don't really seem to fully know how to hold them to account either. they're either (mostly) too vociferous or overly deferential. or so it seems. something ain't right. maybe alot is on pause. i dunno but to hazard some guesses - probably because of implications they can't fully admit to. of interests they can't fully declare. of layers they can't fully reveal.
kinda like sovereignty (since 1648) has been fed through a layered transformer and folks don't fully understand the algorithmic content output of its implications. and whilst it is clear that the rise of adversarial networks is increasing, that the calculations and outputs are neither fully explainable nor transparently clear, that the convolutions are still processing, that some folk are playing for time (whilst others are less patient) and that motives vary, the extent of which cannot be fully verified (nor fully trusted - some more obvious than others).
the cartel model is an organising principle that could lend something to some of the human-centric network issues seeming to threaten or challenge some of the prevailing frameworks that govern international stability. expansion of the (currently limited) parametrization of its historically semantic application to cover more than just crime families and oligarchical monopolies could be done. the rise of international crime and its recent forays into war crimes, the theme and function of sovereignty, economic, corporate and business interests, governmental and financial holdings - all and more have the potential to be 'lensed' or analytically improved through the basic hub and spokes model for positive, neutral and negative structuring purposes, exceptions and offsets obviously permitting.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The IRGC’s 'Lenin Foot' Army
A decade and a half on from V. V. Putin's Munich speech, the IRGC reaffirmed its role in continuing to facilitate the reappearance. Preparation for the emergence was underway from at least March 2022. In a statement prepared for publication to generate the soldiers for a new IRGC age it was declared that 'waiting means that we must prepare ourselves...' so as to establish the rule of justice throughout the world. The jihad was not for those that chose the paths of sitting down and mourning. The call was made to those returning for a cultural-based warfooting in the dialectic of direction and emergence. The forces of oppression, injustice, discrimination, and coercion would support such aims.
In practical terms, the explicit rejection and commensurate condemnation of the liberal international rules-based order was only framed as a 'current situation' that humanity based on ignorance and barbarism. The I.S. alternative is presented as only one of the potentially actionable measures to pave the way for the reappearance program. Against this backdrop, the IRGC’s actions — from regional destabilization to disrupting the international system and its militia network — are being understood and communicated as part of the plan to prepare for the return, the emergence, the reappearance, and subsequent direction.
In 'the fight against', the alliance between 🇮🇷 and 🇷🇺 against (or in contra to) 🇺🇦 represents a form of 'permawar' against mafiosi-like apparitions. Such worldviews - whether they derive from direct involvement in cold-blooded killings or adherence to doctrinal inputs that stem from other associative execution-based regimes - do not necessarily speak for all those that practice as Persians or even for every tongue that can communicate in Farsi.
Nonetheless, the doctrine of the reappearance - so bound as it is to the age of the IRGC and its Islamic Republic masters - is the light for much activity to include beyond the fine words of hadiths, narrations and doctrinal extensions: weapons proliferation, ballistic missile programs, support for arming, financing, and training militias, as well as the nuclear weapon functions at Arak, Fordow and Natanz. Until now, most Western observers have viewed all of the IRGC’s activities through the lens of national interest, but its involvement in the Middle East is more consistent with Maoism than any Islamic doctrine.
3/3 link DT and IGC
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the major problem that the RF now has is that since the hostile takeover of Crimea generically (2014) and the invasion of Ukraine specifically (2022), institutional power has been and is being traded for individual power. and that the weakening of Kremlin power is now an exponentionally zero sum benefit to the expansion of personal power for the Russian President. add to that, the longer Vladimir Vladimirovich is in the presidency, the deeper his authoritarian grip becomes, the stronger his iron fist becomes, the more angry his velvet glove becomes, and the more brutal, brittle and vicious his regime becomes. at the same time it is obvious that the opaqueness around him shall increase, the fantasies and speculation about him increase, the intrigue, the powerplays, the dismissals, the paranoia, the dramas and the tests increase. so the danger that the institutional destabilization chickens are coming home from their democratic forays to roost in the foxhouse also increases. and the increasingly exposed cunning of clever divide and conquer hubris still has to be faced. because he is trying to play everyone for fools - to the international community as if sovereignty doesn't exist, to the Russian nationalists as if there's no such thing as Ukraine, to the PRC like military operations are only ever 'special' and to his own court as if his new clothes of empire aren't old.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
how is Kiev a terrorist when Moscow has been terrorizing Kiev since 2014 and has declared itself (through action not deed) a fully fledged terrorist state since February 2022?
1. Kiev is reacting to the aggressor state
2. the aggressor state is the Russian Federation
3. the Kremlin is a global terrorist network
4. the Kremlin is effectively an international militarized organised crime cartel
5. the Kremlin dominate the reins of the Russian state
6. as organized military criminals prepared to commit war crimes the Kremlin are probably OK with a global genocide
7. the PRC are probably also OK with this
8. the spokes from the Kremlin hub probably include:
i. oil & gas
ii. arms (big and small)
iii. sex (prostitution)
iv. fraud
v. terrorism
vi. kompromat
vii. murder
Nothing really that new in that list of seven there. A fair few states engage in such activities to some extent, even if it is to counter such activities. So within certain parameters there has to be a degree of tolerance even for seriously unpleasant actions. Witness the contemporary spotlight on the role of Saudi Arabia and why a Crown Prince can seemingly and literally get away with murder in international plain sight, one word: power.
Sure that will make him and his country some enemies for life and might lead to further challenges later in time but after all the political hype has died down and the doctrine of 'save a life, save humanity, take a life, kill humanity' gets cycled a few more times that too will pass although where too is anybody's guess.
the issue with the Russian Federation (or its President and his apparatchik henchmen to be more precise) is that the wilingness to commit mass murder whilst clearly remaining indifferent to escalation and even potentially considerate of a major human genocide - if it were possible - reads as error.
when i say error i mean a character flaw. as if the man has been poisoned with a grievance of an insatiable and cannabilistic bloodlust for which the only cure is death but until he passes he shall seek to wreak more death in his tortured crippling of humanity for one reason only: power.
he is beyond return for the mainstream average person on earth that might support life over death and his preparedness to undertake actions that could potentially wipe out 6b people in a nuclear exchange just because he has something to prove to power because his power is not the power makes him wrong.
forgiveness on a personal level is his business. but he deserves to die. he is the head of a mob that exists - like it or not - and will continue to exist beyond his death. but he is a liability beyond that mob now, in the same way that anyone who is bigger than the team they represent becomes a potential liability. he is the 2 + 2 = 8 guy for the Russian Federation but his liability affects everybody on earth. it cheapens and debases the standard of sovereignty as a guarantor, safety net and basic rights and responsibilities exchange between government and the governed. it disavows and lies over a fraudulent double counting and double standard position of territorial ownership. it degrades and ruins dignity, manners, respect and appropriateness in international affairs. and when all is said and done it reeks of bitterness, jealousy, anger and other unenviable human traits that anyone has the potential to fall victim to but only a few, in their erronerous bid for greatness, seem to spectacularly (in the negative sense) achieve.
Russia. please. Fuck your President Vladimir Vladimirovich PUTIN off. He's a nightmare, liability and a wrong'un. He is doing everyone on earth an arrogant disservice when he is in a position in which he should be humbly submitting to the doctrine and practice of service. If he serves anything it is sheol, beezlebub, satan and iblis. he needs away with. for Ukraine but not just for Ukraine - as a harbinger of what more he might succumb too. as the killing continues it will be those that stay neutral who will be reserved the place of true betrayal since all it takes for evil to flourish is for otherwise those who were of good character to do nothing as evil rises.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The USA's longest war in terror
Two decades plus of investment in a heroin-fuelled post-mujahadeen stan space.
HQ1: the problem set. Four-side near three-point. No t-shirt. That's a negative.
More than hundreds and thousands as the hundreds raise up. Now the government (they say) cannot allow the female masjid to madrass her. Else the girls school up.
Inside a triangle, the sound is not the same.
Because 'we' can. Or could rather. No list. No trade. No routes in. No Afghan, No Iraq - even at the behest of a government allowance.
Nineteen + one. A boss. A financier. The unknowns.
Picture that. Call the Chinaman? I think it is now in Ghana sir. U-no, the blackstarr liner...
See, the investments had shifted somewhere else: personnel and materiels had shifted to the conventional ISISGWOT. It's been turned over? Since when?
A two-front operational demand produced the stresses required to generate European investment. Old, new, needs and exacting treasure wasn't going to be cheap - even with the CNN effect in effect.
Between 2011 and 2019 the lack of growth and continued stagnation became diametrically opposed.
A $-tag on the blood of a plan was worth more than cash, especially one run by a kleptocracy. By definition the direction was on lock.
A little known lessons learnt report was identified early on. Long sentences issued by the WP were published in the public domain to reveal a somewhat expanded version of events not previously known.
Doctrinal excuses belied a truth that became increasingly silenced - masked or not. Back when the cables started flying across a brace of remarks that contextually, back in 06, rang bells.
The state of affairs remained unresolved out of context. By 08, the British looked to have failed. Yet again. The chains looked in.
Leakages, leaks and because of facts that poured out five-fold. A GP in the east might have conveyed neutrality yet still the runs added up. Uncovering the morass of friendship and what it did not entail was a lesser evil. As it was then seen.
Boots, shades, a kickback and then a misdirected path that didn't work as intended. The big one with pennies made for ready, lock and load. No problem: afghan heart, afghan mindset.
A cup of tea just to provoke an ambush seemed tactically false. Frustration added units of blood, units of treasure. Amid vocalized threats and reminiscent offenses, the then POTUS in VA officially announced the new phase: stability, training, development and universal education.
---
End the war? Just because you're not wrong, it doesn't necessarily make you right, correct or in the right.
Was it worth it? The output was subject to review and lessons learned from the withdrawal were analyzed in DOD and on The Hill.
The 45 was an instincts-based era. Clarity of blowback prior to blowback was nigh-on an impossible request yet the DJ. deal was inherited on 46.
A roadmap to surrender for the US state was unthinkable. Twin-track negotiations could have been unified in a manner that could have saved time without sacrificing the bureaucracy that GWOT forces had taken so long to help construct.
The full-costs are still in unknowns. Planning, training, mission consequences and the overall conduct of performance in a rationally centered CBA balance-sheet figure continues to be unavailable.
Less bloodloss, less family divisions and less care for failure may well have produced entirely different results. The general lies that built-up prior to withdrawal had little impact yet the effects remain.
Emotional processing using different forms of communication techniques serve many a network yet it is still not known what the total parameterized output would look like in the public sphere.
Far-flung foreign adventures whilst returning to a place only previously known as home created disturbances, generated anger and had former serving personnel asking questions of their leadership which risked raising thresholds that much closer to the draft.
If the gap between the minority and the majority had divorced beyond reasonable doubt then events like J6 could have raised further Congressional-level investigations both at home and abroad. Independents aside, the concepts were alleged to have been squandered by short-term visions that were not aligned inside the twenty-year timetable.
---
Making the strategic choice to exit would have been no simple decision for those personnel required to leave, nor for those personnel and civilians that had assisted, trained with, worked alongside and executed part of the GWOT fight vision.
Without any integration, the lack of clarity across Westernized governance functions imposed on families and communities across Afghanistan were almost irreversible in scope. Many died. The graveyard plots did not decrease. In cost or space.
---
Crisis assistance lines have since been set-up to assist personnel and former personnel suffering or living with the aftermath of GWOTUSA's 20-year investment in 🇦🇫.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
(l-r) gerasimov, shoigu, kirill, medvedev, lavrov, patushev, президент, solovyov, simonyan, zakharova, averyanov, bortnikov, dvoikin
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
lavrov - nope, UN for life. shoigu - no, putin's boss. grasimov - no, putin's sword of damocles. zelenskyy - nope, putin's enemy. navalny - no, siberia. abramovich - no, given up. viktor - no, not 'bout it. vic karamovich - no, not a friend. china - no, not russian. kim - no, just business.
errrr, not at the moment.
1
-
1
-
around the 3:00 mark - far be it for the British to engage in some form of gloating schadenfreude in the analysis of a post-Brexit EU yet it's not as if the Kremlin leadership haven't figured this one out already. and, as for tanks...err, yes, arms sales...err, errm, yes, so, what this means is...errr, errm, hold on a sec here, is there any movie makers, err, errrm, ok, back to the bubble, let's just sweep this dirt here under the narrative carpet and punch above our 03 weight...errr, no, maybe not, err, china...err
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Support for a diplomatic off-ramp whilst Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin is in power would be orange lighting every dictator on earth, public and private, that changing sovereignty and territorial integrity through violence is potentially effective and now on global stand-by. Not to mention that it would also be a betrayal of Ukraine, the principle of international sovereignty and the logic of the post-1945 rules-based order which would have subsequent order consequences for the global south as a new free-for-all.
Divide and conquer can be clever strategic devices to try and split opinion yet having others fight your fights through proxy channels is clearly also a dangerous game. France warned against humiliation and then took a trip to China yet is still central to mainstream negotiations, a somewhat janus-faced position.
On Engagement
- Trust: why seek to sip soup if the devil only has a fork for you? And boxing in the Russians is what Ukraine is doing. Or rather, boxing out.
- Aims: Ukraine is clearly just a sideshow for Russia, just toying with the former SSR in its arrogance.
Mutually incompatible and irreconcilable strategic aims entrench positions, create fortifications (mentally as well as physically) and offer up competing interpretations of reality on such issues as ownership and the role of concepts that include deterrence, concepts that have limited scope for narrative shaping.
Yes, clearly the trojan horse of peace negotiations can be a strategic tool but let's not try to add insult to intelligence here. Please. Violence is violence and kindness can be taken for a weakness. A generic vagueness should be a warning sign from folk that do not deal in abstracts. That applies at least equally to the P.R.C. counterparts.
Ambition can be the ruin of many. The pursuit of glory and greatness can ruin many a man, especially where a society can indulge and support such fantasies, whether through largesse, fame, wealth, confidants, flattery, servants, concubines or cults of personality.
The Russian Federation under Putin is the first major league terrorist state of the G.W.O.T. The Z are prepared to genocide if necessary - or at least make an effort to start one. The rest of the C.R.I.NK.S (🇨🇳🇮🇷🇰🇵🇸🇾) will back it if it suits their aims too and although it might be a stretch to engage the P.R.C. with a global peacekeeping mission set the narrative there at least is still not finished.
In the new breed, the Kremlin currently exceed the I.R.G.C. in the state terrorism issue yet they align in their asymmetry. The I.R.G.C. will sponsor, support, network and do just under the threshold to avoid an overt proscription whilst duck-paddling like crazy underneath. The Kremlin are clearly top-downers that exploit weakness with brutality. They're not about negotiation unless its about subjugation on their terms. Many are or can be seduced by this power in a fascinated sort of pornlike sense. But the result is violence - rape, murder and abuse (a different R.M.A.).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@saraleigh5336 thanks for the insight. so, unless i'm very much mistaken, "antisemitism" is even more of a lousy starting premise than i had previously considered.
coopting the enemy 'word' for purposes of defence is neither novel nor new although the fact that antisemitism has, to all accounts, done a full revolutionary circle in derogatory terms (from a German collective hate offensive to Israeli defenders of 'entitled' hate) is beyond either irony or parody. especially where it is deployed to justify apartheid from the pulpit of unjustified hysteria (in the name of defense).
the world really needs to distinguish certain basics without falling prey to the predators of nuanced detail that turns into irrelevance. anyone supporting the end of Israel (as a state) can ** off. that said, there is a legitimate criticism that can be levelled at Israel: active denial of a fair two-state or equal rights sovereign entity / entities based on a power-holding abuse-blame-victim cycle that consistently points out 'the other' without accepting propotionate responsibility for its own transgressions.
and that there above has in and of itself nothing. i repeat. nothing, to do with hamas, hezbollah, IJ, the pflp, the plo, the PA, the iri, the irgc, intifadahs and so on. all those can be treated seperately and as issues, problens or solutions independent of the central point being made here - Israel, sort it out. including and beginning with yourselves.
talk about confusion...
1
-
1
-
israel doesn't bear the hallmarks of a regime in the specific sense unless you widen the definition of regime as a generic term of insult for the government of any sovereign state.
the difference between israel and iran and how the latter can be charged as a regime when the former cannot reflects itself in the nature of the institutions of state as well as the behaviour of the government in relation to its citizens / populace.
with regards to the former (the institutions) iran is 45 years old (1979) and israel is 76 (1948). with regards to the latter (the actions of government) iran's regime is internally repressive and actively sponsors proxy-force terrorism against israel whereas israel's government is unpopular electorally yet fully prepared to address a multifront regional war to address the threats of terror its haters impose on it.
israel isn't killing its own citizens that don't adhere to jewish fashion protocol. israel is killing its enemies, as well as the friends and families of its enemies if they are in the vicinity of the enemy it is trying to kill. israel isn't trying to hide this. many folk in the rest of the world outside the lands of israel and palestine think israel is killing too much, too many.
iran is trying to kill israel. iran is trying to do so mostly by proxy. iran is therefore trying to disguise the fact it is trying to kill israel. iran clearly wishes to retain the power of denial. but if israel exposes iran for what it is (a bully sponsor) then iran says it doesn't want a fight.
so if iran is trying to coerce and bully israel so it can kill it and israel stands up to iran's bullying by addressing first iran's proxies (hamas, hezbollah and the houthis) and then iran then who is israel standing up to if it stands up to iran?
tehran. and who rules tehran? the legacy holders of the revolution. are these legacy holders individuals or institutions. in a direct sense, they are individuals with one lead individual (the supreme leader) and an institution called the IRGC which has twelver tentacles.
the twelver tentacles of the IRGC are not democratic in a positive sense. to list the top eight of them does not see healthcare and education in the list - the women, life, freedom movement does not exist because the revolution is being tolerant. the IRGC are not respected, they are feared.
mr. netanyahu is regularly castigated as an increasingly isolated figure, reflective of much of the (mostly covert) disdain and hatred that many pockets of the world have for israel on the world stage. yet he's taking the rap for over 40,000 dead in gaza in less than a year's fighting, he's headed the oversight of a trap sprung on hezbollah-hizbollah in lebanon, and he's now under the spotlight for questions about how and when he'll react to iri missile barrages against the israeli state in april and again recently.
his 'regime' is more accurately (or nuanced) as a 'war coalition'. clearly, unpopular with much of his domestic audience he (a former soldier) might think that this is his one and only opportunity to really open up the entire middle east in a way that has not been done before in the modern era. this opportunity - if it is indeed seen as such - would only be (or is) possible because iran (as iri) is offering up a casus: the escalating threat of terrorism with multiple proxies, nuclear intent and near-nuclear (known unknown) capabilities.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
layers of money, layers of tech, layers of lawyers, layers of fraud, layers of cover-up, layers of blame, layers of interests, layers of responsibility, layers of questions, layers of lies, layers of ...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
grief and tragedy, humor and comedy, really are only separated on one level by the gravity of contextual reality.
- currency (in macro terms) is an obvious marker.
if your receipts are being issued in bombs, death, disease, aid, and the absence of food, clean water, sanitation, energy, resources and skills needed to cope, manage and thrive, then debt is the only end state. for those in gaza, a debt now being paid in blood as the treasure simply doesn't exist.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the government has pretty much gone for double or quits despite syriaaaa, despite the supreme court ruling, despite suspicions surrounding the rising costs, despite the lack of clarity for mainstream public consumption, despite the opaqueness, despite the lack of other potential options, despite arsenal fc advertising, despite an obvious lack of coherence, despite not stopping the boats, despite not turning the immigration waves into a market enterprise (ahem, 'Conservatives'), despite hotel bills rising, despite immigration as an issue soaring, despite party questions, despite opposition challenge and just because, in spite, they're chasing bad money after bad.
if this rwanda plan was audited by goldman sachs the prime minister would be sacked.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@patriotzfinder true indeed. it was neither 1964 nor 1968. the cold war had ended and in february 2022 the kremlin knowingly, intentionally, deliberately and purposefully broke all the rules and conventions of international relations in one fell swoop. the invasion of russian forces may well have been a continuation of the crimean takeover but it was still an exception. it was the role of a stronger state (c.145m people with nuclear weapons) invading a smaller state (c. 30m people and a decision made post-cold war to relinquish its nuclear status to that bigger state) - a simple abuse of power by the bigger state (russian federation)
putin as an individual is insecure, has spent too much time in power, is on a one way trip to hell, is a oneman powertrip egotrip gone wrong and going wrong and the longer he persists after feb 22 the more of an arsehole he shows himself to be, the more and more evil his authoritarian and malignant dictatorship tendencies become, the more and more damage he does to both the ukrainian and russian peoples and the more and more he gets deeply and inextricably embedded with north korea and the beijing regime. which just sucks for everyone else in the world too that have to live with the effects of his fallout and obsession with power. not that he cares. as a psychopath he is fully entitled.
what makes the invasion of ukraine different from the invasions of iraq or afghanistan? (for example). many apologists of russia might want to highlight an equivalence standard of how the west is just as guilty and although there are parallels, it is not equivalent. saddam, ghaddafi, soleimani and bin laden were not zekenskyys. they were not able to rally international support to their cause that legitimized their status as dictatorial warlords. putin is in their league. he is a warlord - bound by organized crime yet trying to front that mob as a legitimate entity. it's not - the Kremlin is a front and everyone from Moscow to D.C. knows it. and that is not ok when the spillover effects of that crime is a psychopathic individual so obviously committed to murder - small-scale or large.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@motinmotin8591 i'll give the quiz a go
1. fundamentally - unlikely. discretely - probably.
2. if you ask state of israel - no. if you ask 'state' of palestine - of course.
3. first, depends on your geographical definition of 'occupation'. if yes then israel has the right to defend its sovereignty (as a state) even if the un (united 'nations') doesn't fully endorse (or takes issue)
4. how long you got? in the interests of brevity then probably best to benchmark at the fall of the ottoman empire. so depending on your perspective in the context of the modern sovereign state - 1914, 1917, 1922, 1945, 1948, 1967, 1973, 2001, 2023. or another year.
5. genocide? - no. although given the increasingly elastic politicization of the term if you were representing a particular set of interests in some random place, i dunno, let's say south africa, then yes.
6. if you take a broader sweep of history (say 100 years) and look at the land that the state of israel now occupies (as legitimate custodians obviously) then it is difficult to deny that the so-called 'palestinians' (the majority inhabitants of the lands c. 1917-1922) have not been displaced, compressed and have lost land to live on (actual and potential)
7. to an extent. although as middle eastern states go it could be worse.
8. hamas is an oppressive non-state terrorist network disguised as an outward facing resistance group and an inward facing pimp government
9. oh, this one is easy. britain issued the mandate.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
he came, he convinced, he saw, he believed, he smiled, he verified, he bombed, he expanded, he connected, he surprised, he dropped, he pointed, he shook, he meddled, he invaded.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Trump is like that unemployed drunk guy (even though he don't drink ironically) in the bar who might have a point to make but no-one is that sure about him (and increasingly less so) and it's also increasingly difficult to say 'oh, it's only Donald, he's got our back, he knows it's not just about him.'
And whilst he might express some of the sentiments of the commonsense man and look like he's defending the rights of American folk, he's not that guy. He's a guy who inherited money, status, property, a family business, NYC, millions, billions, credit, debt, lawsuits, casinos, lavish housing built off the back of public housing (Lefrak, Queens). And he has (presumably as Trump Industries Inc.) already tried one hostile takeover of the USA (sedition or not). He should know better.
So, whether you love him or hate him, he's the still the leading (crime-certified, 🇷🇺-backed) Manchurian candidate for American Knightmayor. And what he's saying (if, admittedly, you gotta read between the lines a bit) is that he is ready to transform the 50 states of the USA into a fascist theme park with him President D.J. Trump 2.0 (47) at the tip-top-head of a brand new snake (🐍🎢) ride just like Mayor Humdinger from Paw Patrol. And - just like Mayor Humdinger from Paw Patrol - he's 'borrrrrrriiiiiiiiiing. D.J. Trump is borrrrrrrriiiiiiiing!' Just not in a good way.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
assume he's a genocidal psychopath with a tsarist ego-complex and a rationalization narrative for any means will justify the ends, who is now personally akin to a kalashnikov on fully-auto to use all disposable means at the helm of the Russian Federation to destroy, kill, maim, conquer, torture, kidnap, assassinate, murder, terrorize, steal, rape, lie, propaganize, extort - or let others do it - implicitly or explicitly - if it buys him more power or more time to form a trajectory for a real new world war.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Dear Sir / Madam,
Thank you for your representations. I have taken the opportunity to briefly address them, if i may.
Your representations contain two obvious falsehoods and perhaps more. Although i have no need nor desire to confront the detail of much in which you issue i also note that there are also some key omissions, conspicuous by their absence. Again, i can list two.
To the lies first:
1. You state that war is a failure of diplomacy. As President (aka Commander-in-Chief) you know this is a falsehood and it is deceptive of you to claim otherwise. War is the continuation of diplomacy. This is your failure.
2. "NATO is not a defensive alliance". Again, your misrepresentations belie an intentional and deliberate misunderstanding. You're purposefully manipulating the purpose of defense for your domestic audience. Presumably the blood credit of 500,000 Russians (the current next projected deathcount marker for your strategic error of offense made from Belarus) is also 'defensive'.
As to the bigger picture:
1. Your decision to break with the Kellog-Briand pact of 1928 and conduct an aggressive offensive on the sovereign entity of Ukraine was an initiative of the Russian Federation. In breaking a pact that preceded both Josef Stalin and Adolf Hitler you have rewound the Russian clock back for more than 94 years.
2. Your rejection of sovereignty is a rejection of the EU, NATO, USA and everything to your West, the very powers that gave you the basis of the power you claim and the foundation of the new global order you so desire to make in your own image amongst the rising powers of the declining East.
Sir, this is not the dvor (двор) even if you did have some previous successes in being able to flip it like that for the sake of television viewers. You will have lost Russia even if Russia cannot lose you.
You sir, are a rat (🐀), more CIA than FSB or KGB, more CCP than SVR, and more in slave to your corporate overlords and internationally monied bankers than you are GRU or even Russian. You have betrayed your motherland yet you continue your deception in the plain sight of day as if it were the cover of night.😂
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
over in eastern europe behind the organized crime curtain, there's an old school player that has normalized dictatorship 🇧🇾 and there's a new school player that is trying to normalize a dictatorship 🇷🇺. together, the two dictators of 🇷🇺&🇧🇾 conspired to conduct a full-scale assault on 🇺🇦 (on feb 24th, 2022) to demonstrate that the might of dictatorial violence is the might that is right.
between 1991 and 2014, issues of ukrainian sovereignty, ukrainian politics and ukrainian corruption were largely local or regional issues and by region there is meant russia - the russian federation.
in 2014, russia escalated in and on ukraine. on two levels: crimea; and flight mh17. crimea was a coup by stealth, cunning and ingenious yet it didn't break the regional mould. the downing of mh17, whilst in and of itself is and was not ok, nonetheless still largely contained itself within the regional framework (the near abroad, a moscow jurisdiction) and grayzone warfare (eastern ukraine was already subject to separatist-loyalist divisions).
that all changed on feb 24th of 2022 when russian federation state signed-off on an invasion of ukraine from belarus with over 180,000 soldiers. the invasion broke the rules of the post-1945 consensus in the most blatant and obvious way, was a fundamental rejection of the principle that is westphalian sovereignty (1648) and was itself an act of denial that implied a cold war (1945-1991) hadn't even taken place (don't mention the ussr).
in rewriting history using late nineteenth - early twentieth century levels of violence and supplanting drones for tank and air mechanization, the authority of russia's federation was preeminently unquestionable. a three day lightning strike to decapitate the kiev enemy and three weeks to execute a crimean-like big green men for three months of total capitulation and surrender of submissive ukraine. nearly three years later, the denial persists.
eastern europe's longest running dictator is hiding in plain sight. the second place candidate is an adolf 'godwin' hitler for our age. over in the PRC there is a potential josef stalin brewing. either way (comparative or actual) there is a set (a club, a group, an elite, whatever) that is hell-bent on ensuring that the cult of personality dictator model of governance triumphs over the institutional-based modes.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
13:55 - 14:10 - the westphalian scapegoat
14:53 - domestic projection
Stubbornness in adults can result from being unable to accept losing. Challenging a system can be a corollary of being unable to accept a loss. Even if unachievable, the goal of beating a system can be a way of trying to prove that you are better than the system you're opposing. Outside of power - as an academic exercise - of course that can work: individualism; the achievement narrative; fiction; myths and legends. In power, it is clearly different. You cannot force, manipulate, shape or change either love or power beyond a point. They just are - nukes or not. Which is why that it is claimed that all is fair inside those powers. Unfortunately the love of power is the seduction of hubris that invites contenders to the stage of arrogance. And in the doctrine that offers up the initiative of the offense that all tyranny is invited to dine with, the charge can only deepen. Where there are no institutional checks to remove potential tyrants from consolidating their power, their power enters growth mode, the tyranny extends and the trinitarian balance ceases to exist.
In 2003, the UK decision to militarily assist with the invasion of Iraq was a glimpse of tyranny, a glimpse of ego-driven politics as a continuation of democracy using post-97 media, and a rejection of the people and majority government in favour of American favor and certain elite although still largely unconfirmed interests. The appeal to 'the leader' is nothing new and since Germany was humbled after the Third Reich, the balance of Westphalian hubris was restored with the EU project after 1945. The USSR was not created in the renaissance of eighteenth century awakening, it was not created after 1945 either. The tension between tsarism (monarchy) and proletarianism (Sovietism) is unreconciled, is unresolved. The answer to that dialectic was beyond President B. Yeltsin in the 1990s. The Kremlin after 2000 did not make the same mistake, yet the failure to transfer institutional power and to consolidate it despite institution, not because of institution, is the cult of personality that has now infected the post-Soviet rump - as well as the potential for Maoists worldwide.
Democracy contains jokes. Democracy has comedic elements. Democracy is sometimes a circus. Yet the extent of democracy is not defined or limited by humour, humiliation, derision, disdain, inside games, or secret codes. It can turn full circle on those pivots but it will go through more than might what otherwise be apparent from the outsider perspective before it reveals itself again. Democracy is permitted forgiveness even if authoritarianism denies it can forget. And so in that process over time, democracy - given sufficient conditions - can grow in overall strength as dictatorship can grow in malevolent extremity. The hope, belief, the expectation or assumption from the challenger coming from compressed power is that the enemy they seek victim of will be more brittle, become increasingly weaker, will be easier to attack and will lack the resilience to defend itself. This of course, for the aggressor, may be true - if they have no illusions about their target. Yet only in the niche, only on the platform of choice, only where their projection of fear or overwhelming force can be offered up as an example of submission. Only where the fruit hangs low or is perceived to be ripe. It does not apply writ large unless the illusion of tyranny can be extended as a conspiracy - deniable or not. Which demands monopoly. In 2023, the Kremlin Federation is illustrating the extent to which democracy is a joke is the extent to where human life can be disregarded by those that play god. For those that play the role of the commoner to choose the common life of others as a sacrifice for their own warped sense of power (regardless of whether or not they were once of the common) it is only exploitation (for the ends of...) that can be levelled. Corruption - the genuine sort, not just the legally defined - can then close in. Decay - at best - must follow.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1