Youtube comments of Sexy Beast (@sexybeast7728).

  1. 212
  2. 197
  3. 179
  4. 127
  5. 116
  6. 98
  7. 82
  8. 73
  9. 65
  10. 61
  11. 53
  12. 49
  13. 42
  14. 40
  15. 35
  16. 35
  17. 33
  18. 31
  19. 29
  20. 27
  21. 27
  22. 25
  23. 24
  24. 23
  25. 23
  26. 22
  27. 22
  28. 21
  29. 20
  30. 20
  31. 18
  32. 18
  33. 17
  34. 17
  35. 16
  36. 15
  37. 14
  38. 14
  39. 14
  40. 13
  41. 13
  42. 12
  43. 12
  44. 12
  45. 11
  46. 11
  47. 11
  48. 11
  49. 10
  50. 10
  51. 10
  52. 9
  53. 9
  54. 9
  55. 9
  56. 9
  57. 8
  58. 8
  59. 8
  60. 8
  61. 8
  62. 8
  63. 8
  64. 8
  65. 7
  66. 7
  67. 7
  68. 7
  69. 7
  70. 7
  71. 7
  72. 7
  73. 7
  74. 7
  75. 7
  76. 7
  77. 6
  78. 6
  79. 6
  80. If you are really inteligent just rewatch the video again and you will get it. IQ is a predictor, not a rule. Obviously luck, your path in life and everything else will have the influence on zeros on your bank account, body fat, and so on. He never said that person with 122 IQ will in no circumstance be more successful than person with 142 IQ. IQ only gives you 36% (at most) prediction of life success, still other things matter. You could say that EQ is just a "mix" between IQ and extraversion (Peterson said something like that), which means it's not separated, unique dimension of inteligence hence it doesn't exist as such. Let me go with this analogy. There are 3 fundamental colors that we see. Red, Green and Blue. Analogously, openness (inteligence), extraversion, neuroticism, conscientiousness, agreeableness are fundamental properties of personality. By mixing colors and personality traits you get different colors and different people. Now you are arguing that EQ is real, while it is "real", strictly speaking, it's not fundamental color/property so there is not point of defining it (in psychology) because you get it by mixing two MORE fundamental properties. It's like as if EQ was purple, you would get it by mixing red (let's say IQ) and blue (let's say extraversion). Value of defining EQ is just as useful as defining different personalities like perfectionists or any other. What you have exprienced in your life are benefits of your different personalty traits along side your inteligence. There is only one inteligence. Inteligence mixed with different personality traits result in different range of success in different cirucmstances.
    6
  81. 6
  82. 6
  83. 6
  84. 6
  85. 6
  86. 6
  87. 6
  88. 6
  89. 6
  90. 6
  91. 6
  92. 5
  93. 5
  94. 5
  95. 5
  96. 5
  97. 5
  98. 5
  99. 5
  100. 5
  101. 5
  102. 5
  103. 5
  104. 4
  105. 4
  106. 4
  107. 4
  108. 4
  109. 4
  110. 4
  111. 4
  112. 4
  113. 4
  114. 4
  115. I wouldn't agree that my life would be any different if i encountered Jordan Peterson earlier. I mean, put your life in context. In my case, being 20 myself, i am hitting that age at which things like that become relevant to me and i actually have enough sense to think about stuff like that. Obviously if you are 50 it doesn't apply the same way to you, but the point is that, i think, some things he talks about are probably too complex ideas to be taken seriously by a 15 year old kid (high school kid). He would just ignore everything that is said to him. (I know i had completely ignored reading high quality books for grades in a high school. Now it's completely different story. Back then, they just didn't appeal to me and i guess it would be the same way with things like this.) I am not saying education as it is right now is right, or that there is nothing we can do to improve, on contrary, there are some principles Jordan talks about that could be (and should be) thought earlier, but nothing too extreme i would say. What's mostly wrong with the education is the system of how they learn, not what they learn. It's not that big of a deal, especially because a curious kid, who wants to hear things like that in first place and is willing to act them out, will find ideas like that on internet on his own. People who would find talks like that useful are actually finding them via internet. Including me, you and everyone else watching this. People who are not searching for videos like this are the one who wouldn't find intrinsic value in them even if they watched it.
    4
  116. 4
  117. 4
  118. 4
  119. 4
  120. 4
  121. 4
  122. 4
  123. 4
  124. 4
  125. 4
  126. 4
  127. 4
  128. 3
  129. 3
  130. 3
  131. 3
  132. 3
  133. 3
  134. 3
  135. 3
  136. 3
  137. 3
  138. 3
  139. 3
  140. 3
  141. 3
  142. 3
  143. 3
  144. 3
  145. 3
  146.  @laxifax-8575  oh man, this is anything but deep. I went down the rabbithole. I gave it much more thought than that and i think i understand it. Let me ramble for a bit then tell me what you think: Every sane human being lives in a story, meaning that everyone has certain assumptions, beliefs about life. You see the world through the lenses of that story. The story is what shapes your perception. Change the story you believe in, you change your perceptions of the physical world. For example, if you thonk you are a loser and you are destined to do nothing in life, you will see the events around you in the context of that narrative. Change the narrative and you change how you see that event. You have certain beliefs about who you are, what you want, where you are going (at least unconsciously you have) and there are people and things in life that fill in archtypes of your story. There have to be arxhtypes because every story is fundamentally built of many archtypes interacting with each other. Thats what story is in its purest form. Stories are all the same, the difference between them is only the context, or what fills archtypes. There is an archtype of a father figure, mother figure, hero, villain and so on. You can literally fill them with your father and mother(..), but more often than not, other people (even things) fill in that role. Thats unique for every single human being and ultimately what makes you different than others. Christianity is just one of the infinite amount of stories you can live out. Whether its the best or not remains for the debate. My strong feeling is that it's not the best although it is pretty good and it served its purpose for millenials. The reason i think its outdated is because if you dont understand what i am saying right now, truely believing in the story of Christ, you will encounter a lot of friction in your life due to science. You will believe the Earth is flat while in fact it's not, and so on. You will think the bible is a factual story. It's not and it was never supposed to be. This is the story of how Christianity came about: Imagine yourself 2500 years ago as the part of some stable civilization. Humans are infinitely curious and when we formed civilizations, our chances of survival, as an individual, skyrocketed. Due to the conveniences of group living, we didnt have to spend our whole lifes thinking about how to survive on day to day basis. We, all of a sudden, got a lot of free time. At that time humans being humans started wondering, stared asking difficult questions and at the time, because there was no science, we had no way to answer those questions. Here huge problem araises. We are obsessed with knowing things. People are not comfortable not knowing, living in complete ignorance, but we could not answer them with logic. So what did we do? As always, we started to create hypothesis. We began to create stories of who we are, where are we going to, where are we coming from. Sounds fimiliar? Hold on, it gets better. So how do we go from humans started to create stories to the masterpiece that, objectively, the story of Christ, is? It takes the path of everything, that is complicated, does, the path of evolution. There was a mini evolution among stories that originated from the western culture. They were told from a generation to a generation and only stories that made sense, that were great, survived or were retold and ultimately have been written as the bible. It is the work of the principles of evolution and many anonymous writers and editors. Thats what accounts for complexity of religious texts. You can make a masterpiece and dont know why it is a masterpiece. The best way to demonstrate how that is possible is to reflect on yourself. Youve probably tried to, at one point in your life, create a storyn a movie or a series or a comic book, something. And youve probably had some amazing idea for plot that was so amazing you could barely stand the excitement youve experienced at that moment. Everybody had that moment. The question is, why did that plot make you feel excited and not some other plot? What is about storytelling thats so exciting? The answer is the same that guided writers and editors to the story of Jesus and thats that we intuitevly know when we hit the jackpot in storytelling and when we dont. Hitting the jackpot is the moment when we nail the archtypes of the story and we nail the way interact between each other in the way that makes perfect sense. This is where wisdom lies. That "perfect sense" is your brain telling you there is something fundamentally important about that. Through series of "this makes sense" moments, people can create the bible without knowing why it makes sense. When Jordan Peterson goes out there and blows your mind with insights he got from the bible, what he is doing is explaining and artixulating why it makes sense. And this is not unique to the bible, every story that has ever been told can be artixulated and explained. The best movies and books and series of all times completely nail the archtypes and their interactions which means all of them are full of wisdom. You can learn from them as muxh from the bible. I could go on, but this is where my thoughts are about religion atm.
    3
  147. 3
  148. 3
  149. 3
  150. 3
  151. 3
  152. 3
  153. 3
  154. 3
  155. 3
  156. 3
  157. 3
  158. 2
  159. 2
  160. 2
  161. 2
  162. 2
  163. 2
  164. 2
  165. 2
  166. 2
  167. 2
  168. 2
  169. 2
  170. 2
  171. 2
  172. 2
  173. 2
  174. 2
  175. 2
  176. 2
  177. 2
  178. 2
  179. 2
  180. 2
  181. 2
  182. 2
  183. 2
  184. 2
  185. 2
  186. 2
  187. 2
  188. 2
  189. 2
  190. 2
  191. 2
  192. 2
  193. 2
  194. 2
  195. 2
  196. 2
  197. 2
  198. 2
  199. 2
  200. 2
  201. 2
  202. 2
  203. 2
  204. 2
  205. 2
  206. 2
  207. 2
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1
  220. 1
  221. 1
  222. 1
  223. 1
  224. 1
  225. 1
  226. 1
  227. 1
  228. 1
  229. 1
  230. 1
  231. what is the point/goal in football? Only goal in football is to win thropy which is set by human. Does lack of natural purpose of football makes football any less entertaining to you? No, you still love every bit of it. The same works for life in general, you set the goals and live happily ever after. You shouldn't be concerned about pointless of life on individual basis. ... About contribution to humanity: The first of all we don't know what could and what will happen. Maybe we become immortal, there are literally no limits in life, everything is possible, we don't even know what's possible. Only way to find out is by keep improving science. if you are not a genius yourself who can directly influence our improvment, at least be inspiration. They are countless of ways to do that (from being a great teacher, to being a good person in general) For me, being inspiration for others is one of the most important things in my life and definitely the best way for me to contribute to humanity in general. Don't ever understimate power of inspiration, everybody has to be inspired by someone even the greatest scientists of all time,.. read long time ago that Tesla got some idea on the river by observing some random guy.. That random guy is not even aware of his influence he had on human histoyr. Isn't it inspiring that YOU, a single person who is part of something so huge (part of species that tries to survive in infinte universe) can actually easily change the course of human history? Especially now, in era of internet, now easier then ever Live happy life on individual scale, inspire people on the scale of humanity. You are part of something huge and very rare in universe. What more can you ask for?
    1
  232. 1
  233. 1
  234. 1
  235. 1
  236. 1
  237. 1
  238. 1
  239. 1
  240. 1
  241. 1
  242. 1
  243. 1
  244. 1
  245. 1
  246. 1
  247. 1
  248. 1
  249. 1
  250. 1
  251. 1
  252. 1
  253. 1
  254. 1
  255. 1
  256. 1
  257. 1
  258. 1
  259. 1
  260. 1
  261. 1
  262. 1
  263. 1
  264. 1
  265. 1
  266. 1
  267. 1
  268. 1
  269. 1
  270. 1
  271. 1
  272. 1
  273. 1
  274. 1
  275. 1
  276. 1
  277. 1
  278. 1
  279. 1
  280. 1
  281. 1
  282. 1
  283. 1
  284. 1
  285. 1
  286. 1
  287. 1
  288. 1
  289. 1
  290. 1
  291. ​ @KabzieMusic  Things and objects are nor good nor bad, it's what human behaviour makes of them. Patterns of human behaviour are there, inside our psyche whether there are external things that allow it to manifest or not. An axe killer is an axe killer even if he doesnt have an axe around him. The solution in that case would be not to hide all axes, but to change the behaviour of the particular human being. The solution is not to not have social medias at all, but to change behaviour that makes people depressed. Just like in the case of the axe killer, behaviour is there whether there are social medias or not. All that social medias did was amplifying deeply flawed human instinct to the point it became obvious to everyone,.. and that's awesome, because now we have a deep insight into human psyche that we wouldnt have otherwise. Knowing it, we can adapt and change our lifestyle so we live a better life with less suffering.. how is that not the best thing that could have ever happened? People who are suffering are people with a wrong, loser, weak mindset that would suffer regardless of the existence of social medias because, again, an object is never an issue, it's human's behaviour. If there were no social medias, they would have found something else to ruin their life with. It's their own responsibility to take care of their lifes. That might be cruel of me to say, but nature is cruel. The evolution (the truth) doesnt care about your feelings. You either have what it takes to survive (thrive) or you dont. It's a natural selection. It's been like that for a looong time. If you are suffering, it's time for YOU to take on a responsibility and change your mindset, not blame others for you addictions. Nobody else can help you if you dont help yourself. If you dont help yourself, you will continue suffering. That's the evolutionary deal. So, in conclusion, i am extremely grateful for social medias because, now, i know more about what it takes to live a good life and i dont have to suffer as stupidly.
    1
  292. 1
  293. My prediction, that i havent seen anyone saying so far, but is pretty inevitable imo, is that sports (current and yet-to-be-created ones) and competitions, of any sort, will become something we all just do all the time. The dude from above said there will be no jobs and that that will leave people with nothing to do, leading to depression, which is true, but solution is not that difficult. You dont have to earn money to feel like your time spent on an activity is worthwhile (they are countless of retired people who feel great doing one of their hobbies daily), you just need to be engaged in something, anything and that's where sports and various competitions come into story. When you think of football, for example, it's pretty ridiculous to think about what footballers actually do, strategically kicking ball to score a goal. The sport is completely arbitrary with no greater purpose other than to entertain and yet millions of people find purpose in everyday training, dedicating their entire lifes to the arbitrary goal of becoming the best version of a football player as they can. Even after they've earned enough money for 10 lifes, they retire and become football managers for next 20 years. People can get occupied pretty easily so what will happen is that many new, arbitrary activities will be created in which people will find their peace. Now, i am not saying that is everything to it, but you roughly get an idea of what people will be doing, after all, we are just bunch of hormones raising and dropping its levels, we are not that tough to fool. Ensure stimulation of dopamine, oxytocin and few others, and will be fine.. how hard can it be?
    1
  294. 1
  295. 1
  296. 1
  297. 1
  298. 1
  299. 1
  300. 1
  301. 1
  302. 1
  303. 1
  304. 1
  305. 1
  306. 1
  307. 1
  308. 1
  309. 1
  310. 1
  311. 1
  312. 1
  313. 1
  314. 1
  315. 1
  316. 1
  317. 1
  318. 1
  319. 1
  320. 1
  321. 1
  322. 1
  323. 1
  324. 1
  325. 1
  326. I am more concerned because of the harm it does to an environment and the fact that is unsustainable in a long run than any of the moral things. It would be cool if unnecessary suffering was brought to minimum, but naah.. people are too empathetic, which is an awful thing to be. It goes deeper than what you think. You will gladly smack the shit out of a musquito if it landed on you, so killing, by itself, obviously is not an issue. There is something deeper going on. We can argue what but here are several facts to consider: Some mammals (majority, i would say), like cats, do not experience grief when their fucking youngling dies, none whatsoever! They just move on with their lifes like nothing happened. Cow would gladly kill you given the upperhand and decent enough motivation, and would experience no guilt or regret whatsoever, not to mention that no animal whatsoever is even close to the complexity of our experiences. You literally can't empathize with animals. The reason you dont care if you step on an ant, but you feel bad if you hit a dog is because dog is much more similar looking animal to human, so you think that you understand what is going through,.. no you dont, dont be an arrogant ass thinking you can play God deciding which animal is cool and which not cool to kill. You dont have that right. If there was an alien far more complex than chicken but it looked nothing like human, you would be okay killing it, i guarantee you that. The bottom line is that you are too empathetic about it, get over it
    1
  327. 1
  328. 1
  329. 1
  330. 1
  331. 1
  332. 1
  333. 1
  334. 1
  335. 1
  336. 1
  337. 1
  338. 1
  339. 1
  340. 1
  341. 1
  342. 1
  343. 1
  344. 1