Comments by "James LaBarre" (@SenileOtaku) on "Louis Rossmann" channel.

  1. 144
  2. 59
  3. 44
  4. 40
  5. 27
  6. 26
  7. 20
  8. 16
  9. 16
  10. 15
  11. 15
  12. 14
  13. 14
  14. 14
  15. 13
  16. 13
  17. 12
  18. 10
  19. 9
  20. 9
  21. 9
  22. 9
  23. 8
  24. 8
  25. 8
  26. 8
  27. 8
  28. 7
  29. 7
  30. 6
  31. 6
  32. 6
  33. 5
  34. 5
  35. 5
  36. 5
  37. 5
  38. 5
  39. 5
  40. 4
  41. 4
  42. 4
  43. 4
  44. 4
  45. 4
  46. 3
  47. 3
  48. 3
  49. 3
  50. 3
  51. 3
  52. 3
  53. 3
  54. 3
  55. 3
  56. 3
  57. 3
  58. 3
  59. 3
  60. 3
  61. 3
  62. 3
  63. 3
  64. 3
  65. 3
  66. 3
  67. 3
  68. 3
  69. 3
  70. 3
  71. 2
  72. 2
  73. 2
  74. 2
  75. 2
  76. 2
  77. 2
  78. 2
  79. 2
  80. 2
  81. 2
  82. 2
  83. 2
  84. 2
  85. 2
  86. 2
  87. 2
  88. 2
  89. 2
  90. 2
  91. 2
  92. 2
  93. 2
  94. 2
  95. 2
  96. 2
  97. 2
  98. 2
  99. 2
  100. 2
  101. 2
  102. 2
  103. 2
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. 1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163. 1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. 1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. 1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. 1
  201. 1
  202. 1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1
  220. 1
  221. 1
  222. 1
  223. 1
  224. 1
  225.  @thalesnemo2841  The problem with the electoral college is the same as the problem with the way Senators are elected. Senators are selected by the popular majority of the state **in total**. Now when you have someplace like New York State, where the majority of the population is concentrated in two or three cities, those cities overwhelm the interests of the remainder of the state. The proper method would be to tally the votes *by county*, and then use those county votes to see who becomes senator for that term. As I understand the weird way NYC is set up, each borough counts as a "county", so even there they'd get five votes. The House of Representatives has it's members chosen by population groups of a particular size, so it's not like NYC and other similar cities aren't already being adequately represented. This is how the Electoral college should run. Two electors selected by a county subtotaling, and the remainder by a tally of the corresponding district to each. Of course, my own particular solution is a variant of one I read someplace. Rather than the massive dog-and-pony circus we deal with every four years, we should simply expand the electoral system, picking 100 people by lottery of citizens within a congressional district, for each congressional district. These people would receive the campaign materials of each candidate, and would make a choice from those. 100 superelectors per congresscritter means the number is high enough they can't be personally strongarmed by the candidate, yet still is economically possible for third-party candidates to participate. The superelectors can have time to mull over the particular platforms, get input from their friends, family, etc, and make their own decision without all the hype.
    1
  226. 1
  227. 1
  228. 1
  229. 1
  230. 1
  231. 1
  232. When I finally had to replace my 5 year old Droid Razr HD (it would no longer recognize SIM cards) Ibought a Moto E5, unlocked*, for $130. It does what it needs to do (make & receive phone calls), works as a basic note pad and address book, *PLUS has the headphone jack and removable battery. Only problem with it was it had grown larger (W & H, not thickness) and barely fits in the carrying pouch I used for the Droid Razr. Other than the fact I have to (apparently) activate "OK Google" in order to use voice command over my bluetooth headset (F*** you Google) it's the perfect phone for my needs. feeble excuses on why they have to reduce/remove things is like one of my big complaints with Android tablets. I would actually prefer a full-size SD/MMC card slot, since there's plenty of space on the housing to fit one. But the manufacturers (f*** them) will never do that. Bezels? Yeah, I prefer some sort of bezel on the phone (big clumsy hands, so it's harder to use something with a full wrap-around screen) I ALSO would prefer them on my laptop screen as well. I hate it that laptops these days come with those paper-thin displays that seem as though the manufacturers WANT them to flex and break. I'd rather have something thicker and more resilient. So these days I only look at used machines (I'm loading Linux on them anyway, so don't need the warranty). Remember way back when Mad Magazine would have those 'pictorials' for various businesses, and the particular business would go out of their way to provide BAD customer service? Why do I get the impression business schools adopted them as models for running businesses these days? No, folks, those weren't meant as guidelines...
    1
  233. 1
  234. 1
  235. 1
  236. 1
  237. 1
  238. 1
  239. 1
  240. 1
  241. 1
  242. 1
  243. 1
  244. 1
  245. 1
  246. 1
  247. 1
  248. 1