Comments by "josh fritz" (@joshfritz5345) on "Jubilee"
channel.
-
34
-
30
-
25
-
10
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I'm on the side of all lives matter. While I do believe that the lives of black people matter too, I don't support the BLM movement. Many of the people who do have nothing but good intentions, but it's leaders have some very questionable goals and ideologies, and the protests very frequently devolve into violent looting and rioting. This is not always the fault of BLM itself, but even when it is caused by another, more extreme far left group like Antifa, BLM protests (which often start peacefully) are usually the inciting event.
As far as black people being discriminated against... It varies wildly from city to city and in what way, but from what I have seen, many claims of discrimination are either factually untrue, or based on skewed data. While black and hispanic people may indeed face more challenges on average, much of this is due to socio-economic status (wealth), as well as family and cultural influence.
2
-
1
-
Guns are a part of American culture, and the right to own them is a right covered in the same document as the one that protects free speech, the right to assemble, etc. Yeah, it's possible for a country to exist without any of those things, but taking away any one of them is unthinkable in the US. People care about their liberty here, and as strange as it may seem to an outsider, guns are a part of that. Guns are what built out country, allowed us to break away from the British empire, and the additude of guns being a part of our culture, for better or worse, has existed ever since.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Cherryripe25 Yeah, porn can cause that. I have low confidence, and I can't blame that on porn. Lack of confidence, depression, mental disorders, addiction... you can blame them to outside factors which may indeed contribute to them, but the core issues lie with one's self.
I just don't like that some people want to ban everything that could be considered addictive or dangerous. Not everyone wants to, but some people use other people's struggle with insert issue here to call for increase regulation or the outright banning of an item/ activity.
I can see how porn would create certain expectations for women of course, but I don't think the expectations being creative are any less potentially harmful to men. We need to recognize that porn is, essentially, fiction. Sex doesn't work the way it does in porn, and not enough people realize that.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Probably gonna catch some flak for this. I think that climate change science is a lot less reliable and more politically influenced than most others, and is inheriantly less trustworthy because of it. I don't deny that climate change is happening, practically every scientist agrees that it is, where things get a bit less clear cut is when you try to get exact numbers for how much of an impact humans are having on it.
Most scientists don't comment on whether humans are having an effect on the Earth's climate or not. The "95% of scientists say humans are causing climate change" claims are an outright lie, completely ommiting the majority of those who don't comment on that.
That alone is not enough to invalidate the claim of humans impacting the climate as there are still more scientists believing we are than aren't, but it does go to show how political agendas can impact either scientific studies or their presentation, something that has become all too common these days.
I believe humans are having some impact on our climate, there appears to be much more evidence in favor of that than otherwise. The real issue is we have very little idea how much of an impact we are having. It is very difficult to find solid, non-contradicting numbers because the climate change models are so complicated, and contain so many unknown variables.
I'm not denying that humans are speeding up climate change, we almost certainly are. But those claiming that global warming will be as apolocolypyic as a giant asteroid or a solar flare don't seem very helpful or believable when the claims are based on cherry picked data from outlying studies, when many more studies suggest a slower or more mild effect over the same time scale. It's borderline anti-vax logic. Choosing one outlying study over many more that have much milder results.
1
-
1