Comments by "josh fritz" (@joshfritz5345) on "Jubilee" channel.

  1. 34
  2. 30
  3. 25
  4. 10
  5. 7
  6. 6
  7. 6
  8. 4
  9. 3
  10. 3
  11. 3
  12. 3
  13. 3
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. Probably gonna catch some flak for this. I think that climate change science is a lot less reliable and more politically influenced than most others, and is inheriantly less trustworthy because of it. I don't deny that climate change is happening, practically every scientist agrees that it is, where things get a bit less clear cut is when you try to get exact numbers for how much of an impact humans are having on it. Most scientists don't comment on whether humans are having an effect on the Earth's climate or not. The "95% of scientists say humans are causing climate change" claims are an outright lie, completely ommiting the majority of those who don't comment on that. That alone is not enough to invalidate the claim of humans impacting the climate as there are still more scientists believing we are than aren't, but it does go to show how political agendas can impact either scientific studies or their presentation, something that has become all too common these days. I believe humans are having some impact on our climate, there appears to be much more evidence in favor of that than otherwise. The real issue is we have very little idea how much of an impact we are having. It is very difficult to find solid, non-contradicting numbers because the climate change models are so complicated, and contain so many unknown variables. I'm not denying that humans are speeding up climate change, we almost certainly are. But those claiming that global warming will be as apolocolypyic as a giant asteroid or a solar flare don't seem very helpful or believable when the claims are based on cherry picked data from outlying studies, when many more studies suggest a slower or more mild effect over the same time scale. It's borderline anti-vax logic. Choosing one outlying study over many more that have much milder results.
    1
  41. 1