General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Be N S O N
PragerU
comments
Comments by "Be N S O N" (@Colddirector) on "The Market Will Set You Free | 5 Minute Video" video.
You mean the same guy who buddied up with Stalin?
11
Mark Tylerson Socialism is the collective owning of the means of production by the people.
7
1337fraggzb00N Capitalism’s death toll is far higher, you just never bothered counting
4
Ishfaaq Peerally - Popular Investor capitalism is walking us off an ecological cliff, and is lying about it all the way.
3
01100110 01110101 01110010 1. Multiple scientific consensus studies have been done, not a single one drops below 90%. It’s pretty clear climate change is manmade 2. Conservatives refuse to even discuss climate adaptation strategies. 3. Every single one of you cretins brings up global cooling or whatever - it’s an obscure hypothesis that was brought up in the 70s and blown up by the media, the only people who care about it are denialists like you. Science is designed to be challenged by other science, not by you sticking your fingers in your ears and screaming as loud as you can.
3
Diksaca Yehovah neoliberals
3
Christopher You can disagree with Bernies actions, but climate change is an all too real threat. To deny that is to deny science itself.
2
The Outlaw Torn Climate change is real. A horse and wagon simply wouldn’t get Bernie around fast enough to do the campaigning necessary.
2
01100110 01110101 01110010 1. So the consensus is a conspiracy. Okay... 2. I said nothing about taxes, you just pulled that out of nowhere. in fact they’re a useless half measure that prevents real action. Seems like you’re the NPC here since you just defaulted to a preset argument implemented by your programmers. Swing and a miss. 3. My credibility is irrelevant, I’ve only ever referred to the work of scientists, while you seem to have just accused them of being in an international conspiracy with no evidence. All the work has been done for us, you just refuse to look at it because you’ve been programmed not to.
2
Uncommon Sense I just told you.
2
Neil Desperandum Churchill said that Stalin was his friend after a long dinner
1
megustAslagt This shouldn’t be surprising. Capitalists love to take credit for the hard work of others.
1
01100110 01110101 01110010 1. Again, no evidence. You just want that to be the case because it fits your preprogrammed beliefs. 2. Taxes are the only thing neoliberal scum and the right are willing to put forth because they refuse to address the elephant in the room - the fossil fuel industry. The scientists who know climate change is happening are specifically rallying for more to happen. You wouldn’t know this because listening to scientists is not coded into your algorithm. 3. Then you’re simply wrong. This is why you’re designed to default to baseless claims of peer pressure to explain away the ocean of consensus against you.
1
01100110 01110101 01110010 1. https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence.amp 2. You say nuclear as if I’m dead set against it. Another NPC assumption. Go ahead and put it forward as a climate mitigation strategy, as long as it’s being discussed I’d be thrilled. 3. The data isn’t inconclusive, you’re just wrong, and deep down, past the scripted conversation trees, you know it is, which is why you keep referring to your default baseless claim of peer pressure.
1
01100110 01110101 01110010 Really, Climategate. That’s all you’ve got. That thing which was investigated repeatedly and no wrongdoing was actually found. You repeatedly said you’re not putting forward a conspiracy when the implications of climategate are conspiratorial, so which is it? The only thing that came out of that was quote mines for rubes like you to repeat until the end of time. Oh and now that I’m thinking of it, I thoroughly debunked your little “global cooling” claim and I’ve noticed you’ve since dropped that argumentation. Would you like to concede that “argument” for me? Some reading for you: https://web.archive.org/web/20111129043647/http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/d0cf6618525a9efb85257359003fb69d/56eb0d86757cb7568525776f0063d82f!OpenDocument http://web.archive.org/web/20110330133202/http://www.oig.doc.gov/OIGPublications/2011.02.18_IG_to_Inhofe.pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20110228030846/http://live.psu.edu/fullimg/userpics/10026/Final_Investigation_Report.pdf I can keep going if you want
1
01100110 01110101 01110010 Okay, if you think peer review is a cult, I want you to throw out your computer. Most of its parts are built off of peer reviewed science. Why are you using a product built off of cult practices? Throw it out. I also noticed you haven’t conceded that little “global cooling” claim i shot down. Please concede you were wrong and I’ll move on.
1
01100110 01110101 01110010 Actually no, we’re talking about the climate. You couldn’t even get that right. Climate change does stand by “its own”, whatever that is supposed to mean. you just insist on peer pressure that isn’t there and link to conspiracies that have been repeatedly debunked. This has devolved to utter gibberish, trying to respond to this garbage is like playing chess with small child that doesn’t know the rules.
1
01100110 01110101 01110010 I repeatedly did. I’ve even debunked your baseless conspiracies. All you’ve responded with is the same NPC dialogue of “I haven’t proven anything when I’ve repeatedly done so. Tell your dev to patch that bug out of your code.
1
01100110 01110101 01110010 Uh huh. Of course your simplistic natural language algorithm would derive such a simplistic and wrong reading from the material. I can’t blame you for being poorly made. I’m really not sure what you’re asking, I’ve shown you the readily available data. Do I need to do my own consensus study for you to accept the 6 or so that have already been done? I might do that if you’ll pay me for the man hours necessary.
1
01100110 01110101 01110010 the Qu’ran is very open to interpretation given all the sectarianism, so no, science is nothing like the Qu’ran. You’re free to draw your own conclusions, but your particular conclusions are idiotic and demonstrate a lack of reading comprehension. Sorry, but facts don’t care about feelings. Good job - you’ve deduced that people will not do shit for free. That’s kind of the point of capitalism. Now, since I’ve been so forthcoming about evidence of climate change and climate consensus, please give me evidence of this global conspiracy to fake climate change for money. You’ve already got like what, 3 baseless claims under your belt, don’t make it 4.
1
01100110 01110101 01110010 I specifically said I had more links, but you only now seem to have a problem with it, when you’re desperately clawing for anything to hit me with. Sad. Also, by what official standards did the aforementioned behaviour lack rigour? Not to mention you refuse to address anything else in the documents, simply picking what looks like the ripest cherry to your little mind. If it’s just your opinion, then that’s meaningless. So no, you have no evidence of this vast conspiracy. Just infantile conjecture. And Greenpeace isn’t publicly funded, another basic fact wrong. How boring.
1
Ykcub Evan maybe for none-political issues, but I’m too financially comfortable to consider lying about important political issues for money.
1
As opposed to capitalists who want to see America literally burn from climate change
1
Uncommon Sense Consensus for the current warming being manmade has been repeatedly studied - not a single one dips below 90%. So yes, there is consensus.
1
Trump: “I know more than the generals”
1
Kevin S + constant US foreign intervention
1
Uncommon Sense same standard levied upon socialism. Less unfair actually, since capitalism has had centuries of largely unopposed rule.
1