Comments by "Betty Swunghole" (@bettyswunghole3310) on "A Professor of Critical Race Studies at the University of Birmingham explains…" video.

  1. "Wealth of Evidence" = "Long list of unsubstantiated personal beliefs he desperately wants to be true, that exists nowhere except in his head.".
    6
  2. I do wonder how on earth these people get to be "professors" in the first place. The man has simply dismissed an idea he doesn't personally like without providing any kind of justification for doing so. Then he goes on to inadvertently argue for an issue that he's trying to build a case against, presumably out of lack of understanding of the limits of his own intellectual ability. Where's the "scientific method"? Where's the "intellectual rigour"? Where's the "research"? Where's the "proof"? Where's the "peer review"? Where's the "dispassionate analysis"? Where's the "hard fact"? All absent. This is not how "academia" is supposed to work. Why isn't someone in "authority" questioning this nonsense? Why is he getting funding? There needs to be comprehensive audit of what exactly is going on in our universities...particularly in "social science" and allied faculties. "Research" is simply being made up and passed off as "academically valid" in order to reinforce a narrative, it seems.
    5
  3. Left Wing "academics" never stop to ask themselves why theories concerning "race and IQ" keep resurfacing...maybe because there's a certain amount of truth to them...
    3
  4. I seem to think the "professor" debunked himself at the end of the vid by acknowledging that there is a correlation between race and IQ. He seemed to be under the misapprehension that this was something to do with "systemic racism", though. Anyway, you're kind of missing the point of the vid...it's not about whether "race and IQ" is a "thing" or not...it's a criticism of the risibly poor pseudo-scientific mumbo-jumbo and politically motivated narrative reaffirmation that passes for "academic research" these days.
    1
  5.  @psymantronic1528  I didn't actually make an argument, I merely pointed out the flaws in yours....you seem to have the same analytical powers as the subject of the vid...which is to say very few. You certainly seem to share a propensity for overly-verbose invective as an attempt at obscuring meaning with the Prof. Just FYI, I've actually been through the mill of the University of Birmingham Department of Education, and I've experienced at first-hand the shameless lack of scientific method and blatant bias that goes into their "research". So, I'm sure you'll forgive me if I have a rather dim view of what they do. Also, you're a bit behind the times if you don't mind me saying so. "Race is a social construct" is so 2017. It may have escaped your notice, but BLM rather rely on "race" not being a "social construct" for their bread and butter...so I guess Left Wing social theory has had to change accordingly. You should keep up-to-date with your sound bytes if you want to keep in with the "right on" crowd...
    1