Comments by "channel" (@channel1_channel) on "Does Hydroxychloroquine work?" video.

  1. ​ @newlifestartsnow4444  "this drug can result in serious adverse events" - A cheap decades old drug. The side effects are not common and pertain mainly to patients whom already have cardiovascular issues. A quick painless ECG can sort this aspect out in most patients. In particular, monitoring for an extended QT interval.
    22
  2.  @AliveDeejay  The study used hydroxychloroquine in "moderate to severe respiratory illness". This is a problem. I would expect poor results in this study, and surprise surprise ..they results are poor. Other doctors are using it in the early stages of symptoms, and typically adding either azithromycin or zinc, or both.
    18
  3. I've been subscribed to John's channel for something like a decade. This video is a disgrace. His work is usually pretty good.
    16
  4. Hydroxychloroquine should be given to patients EARLY...and in combination with zinc and azithromycin. This study did NONE of this.
    13
  5.  @brandongilmore6119  I've worked with hundreds of respiratory patients. This medication should be administered early, and reportedly in combination with zinc and azithromycin. Imagine doing a trial on an antiviral medication that waits until patients have an oxygen saturation of 94%. This trial used the wrong patient cohort.
    13
  6. use EARLY...with ZINC and AZITHROMYCIN. This study did NONE of this. The study is irrelevant. I would expect this study to FAIL.
    12
  7. Hydroxychloroquine should be given to pts E A R L Y...and in combination with zinc and azithromycin. This study did zip/nada/zero of this.
    8
  8. Hydroxychloroquine should be given to patients EARLY...and in combination with zinc and azithromycin. This study did NONE of this.
    7
  9.  @zaltmanbleroze  The study used hydroxychloroquine in "moderate to severe respiratory illness". This is a problem. I would expect poor results in this study, and surprise surprise ..they results are poor.  Other doctors are using it in the early stages of symptoms, and typically adding either azithromycin or zinc, or both.
    6
  10.  @sugarpuffbutty  This study does not treat the early onset of infection. It did not include zinc. So this study is not evidence, for those well known treatment aspects. I would expect the results the study found. Treating patients with a sats of 94% (in general) is treating them too late.
    6
  11.  @patrickbrown3336  Not that I personally needed his advice on Vit D. I sunbaked today and take supplemental vitamin D most days. Yeah...John really screwed up with this video. So many issues neglected. Example: At baseline, the patients given hydroxychloroquine had median PaO2/FiO2 of 223, whilst the patients who did not receive hydroxychloroquine had a PaO2/FiO2 of 360 (see table in study). Crazy crappy biased "science". Why a mess medical science can so often be.
    6
  12. I bet they wouldn't study Remdesivir only against patents who already have a sats of only 94%. Also, Hydroxychloroquine needs to preferably be given with zinc and zpac it would seem.
    5
  13.  @conwaydante4155  The state of modern medicine in 2020! Seriously....there is so much doggy doodoo to sift through.
    5
  14. This study gave it to patients with an oxygen saturation of 94% only. So the study is pretty useless.
    4
  15. Yes, this study used the group of patients we already know don't respond so well > Pateints in "moderate to severe respiratory illness". This is a problem. I would expect poor results in this study, and surprise surprise ..they results are poor. Other doctors are using it in the EARLY stages of symptoms, and typically adding either azithromycin or zinc, or both.
    4
  16. ....insane that they waited until patients had a sats of 94%. The study was designed to fail.
    4
  17. ..and administered EARLY.....not late when sats are 94% !!!!!!! This study was seemingly meant to fail.
    3
  18.  @jonthebarbernj8455  "Like wouldn't it need to be proven to work?" - NO. Not if you are claiming a particular thing does not work. This study for example did not include patients with early stages of symptoms, so it is unscientific and frankly stupid to claim the medication "does not work on patients with cold-19". Many doctors are prescribing the medication EARLY and with zinc or azithromycin or both. This study did 0 of these! Welcome to modern medicine.
    3
  19. Hydroxychloroquine should be given to patients EARLY...and in combination with zinc and azithromycin. This study did NONE of this. .....and our doctor within this video made no mention of this.
    2
  20. Apples compared to Oranges. From the study" Hydroxychloroquine-treated patients had a lower Pao2:Fio2 at baseline than did patients who did not receive hydroxychloroquine (median, 233 vs. 360 mm Hg).
    2
  21. They probably got it EARLY, not late, and had it in combination with zinc and azithromycin. The proper way.
    2
  22.  @6789uiop  If I want Hydroxychloroquine to fail, I would have designed the study in the same way.
    2
  23.  @posteveryside-beatsnews  At least I did not claim "it doesn't work" like Dr. Campbell just did. The study did not even include the early onset covid-19 patients. I've worked with hundreds of respiratory patients and treating them with an anti-viral when their oxygen saturation get to 94% is simply wrong. I even worked in our ICU lately, although I did not work directly with the one covid-19 positive patient there. I've been subscribed to this chanel for perhaps a decade BTW. This is Dr.Campbell's worst video ever.
    2
  24. The study stink to high heaven: Hydroxychloroquine-treated patients were more severely ill at baseline than those who did not receive hydroxychloroquine (median ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen, 223 vs. 360)
    2
  25. The results of this study are expected. Hydroxychloroquine should be given EARLY...with ZINC and AZITHROMYCIN. This study did NONE of this. The study is irrelevant and almost a complete waste of time.
    2
  26. It gets even worse when you look at the study in detail. Example from the study: Hydroxychloroquine-treated patients had a lower Pao2:Fio2 at baseline than did patients who did not receive hydroxychloroquine (median, 233 vs. 360 mm Hg).
    2
  27. Exactly.
    2
  28.  @barrycarey7521  Yup, anyone following what is going on already knows this. Azithromycin may assist too.
    2
  29. NO. It supposed to used on early onset. add zinc..and add azithromycin.
    1
  30. haha ...so true. I hope is just ignorant!
    1
  31.  @mikescandif826  I've been subscribed to John's channel for close to a decade, and have learnt various things from him over the years. John is a doctor of nursing and I am an RN. I don't mean to come of as rude (the initial comment is actually quite funny though). I truly hope that John is sincerely ignorant to greater picture of hydroxychloroquine as a co-agent vs EARLY onset symptoms of covid-19 infection. His video presentation here is the worst I have ever come across over the many years I've been subscribed.
    1
  32. Using this anti-viral on patents with a sats of only 94%. This is stupid. This med should be administered early. The study studied the wrong criteria. Zinc and azithromycin should also be given.
    1
  33. He uses it in combination and early on. This study did neither!!
    1
  34. Hydroxychloroquine should be given early. Not with patients who have a saturation of 94%. Give zinc and zpac also. The study is flawed.
    1
  35. The study cohorts differ from the baseline: Hydroxychloroquine-treated patients were more severely ill at baseline than those who did not receive hydroxychloroquine (median ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen, 223 vs. 360)
    1
  36. It turned very political, although medicine is very political anyway. BIG DOLLARS.
    1
  37. Hydroxychloroquine should be given to pts EARLY...and in combination with zinc and azithromycin. This study did >> Z E R O of this.
    1
  38. Everyone knows it....and I'm guessing those who set up the study know it too. They also did not administer zinc and zpac.
    1
  39. Within the study: Hydroxychloroquine-treated patients were more severely ill at baseline than those who did not receive hydroxychloroquine (median ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen, 223 vs. 360)
    1
  40. LOL...great timing with this video.
    1
  41. Yeah..this is bad.
    1
  42. The study cohorts differ from the baseline: Hydroxychloroquine-treated patients were more severely ill at baseline than those who did not receive hydroxychloroquine (median ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen, 223 vs. 360)
    1
  43. There is no disappointment for those who have researched what various doctors are doing. Hydroxychloroquine should be given to patients EARLY...and in combination with zinc and azithromycin. This study did NONE of this, so it irrelevant.
    1
  44. Hydroxychloroquine should be given to patients EARLY...and in combination with zinc and azithromycin. This study did zero of this. Welcome to modern medicine.
    1
  45. Hydroxychloroquine should be given to patients EARLY...and in combination with zinc and azithromycin. This study did NONE of this.
    1
  46. The median F/P ratio between the study cohorts is actually significant. From the study - " Hydroxychloroquine-treated patients had a lower Pao2:Fio2 at baseline than did patients who did not receive hydroxychloroquine (median, 233 vs. 360 mm Hg).
    1
  47. Study text: Hydroxychloroquine-treated patients were more severely ill at baseline than those who did not receive hydroxychloroquine (median ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen, 223 vs. 360)
    1
  48.  @jjryan1452  "the question is when did dr campbell last wok on a patient to administer hydroxychloroquine or remdisivar and what study was he involved in" - NO. None of us need to be involved in the actual work of the study. It is the RESULTS of the study AFTER it is finished that we are interested in. In this case they studied the WRONG patients.
    1
  49. Giving an anti-viral to patients with a sats of 94% is pretty stupid. These drugs are typically given early in the onset, not later. Zinc and azithromycin are also missing from the study.
    1
  50. I've been subscribed to Dr. Cambell's for many years (maybe even 10 years!). This is his worst video ever.
    1
  51. I am a nurse too. Check this out from the study: Hydroxychloroquine-treated patients were more severely ill at baseline than those who did not receive hydroxychloroquine (median ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen, 223 vs. 360)
    1
  52.  Emma Thompson  Multiple doctors have been administering it with zinc. Obviously they see a need to boost zinc levels.  Hydroxychloroquine should be given to patients EARLY...and in combination with zinc and azithromycin. This study did NONE of this.
    1
  53. ​ Emma Thompson  Zinc was not included in the study. The link to the study is in this videos description. See for yourself. Article title: Observational Study of Hydroxychloroquine in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19
    1
  54. The study gave pts hcq without zinc and too late. Further - The study cohorts differ from the baseline: Hydroxychloroquine-treated patients were more severely ill at baseline than those who did not receive hydroxychloroquine (median ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen, 223 vs. 360)
    1
  55. People research. There are many issues. From within the study we can all read " Hydroxychloroquine-treated patients had a lower Pao2:Fio2 at baseline than did patients who did not receive hydroxychloroquine (median, 233 vs. 360 mm Hg).
    1
  56. Dr. Campbell should have pointed this aspect out - "Hydroxychloroquine-treated patients were more severely ill at baseline than those who did not receive hydroxychloroquine (median ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen, 223 vs. 360)"
    1
  57. Exactly. BTW, a vaccine won't be subject to such scrutiny.
    1
  58. @titmus a OK, please show me a large randomised double blinded study pertaining to the safety of the Hep B vaccine on first day babies, where adverse events are recorded for longer than 48 hours? Show me a large randomised double blinded study that investigates the safety of giving two or more vaccines to a child in one day?
    1
  59. Pathetic!...The study used hydroxychloroquine in "moderate to severe respiratory illness". This is a problem. I would expect poor results in this study, and surprise surprise ..they results are poor.  Other doctors are using it in the early stages of symptoms, and typically adding either azithromycin or zinc, or both.
    1
  60. The issues are many unfortunately. The study cohorts differ from the baseline: Hydroxychloroquine-treated patients were more severely ill at baseline than those who did not receive hydroxychloroquine (median ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen, 223 vs. 360)
    1
  61. The study cohorts differ from the baseline: Hydroxychloroquine-treated patients were more severely ill at baseline than those who did not receive hydroxychloroquine (median ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen, 223 vs. 360)
    1
  62. Here is part of the study text: Hydroxychloroquine-treated patients were more severely ill at baseline than those who did not receive hydroxychloroquine (median ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen, 223 vs. 360)
    1
  63. I knew about the use of hydroxychloroquine weeks before Trump mentioned it. Many others will have too. There are actually lots of issues, but these are only known to those who bother to study. An example though within the study is that the baseline for patient cohorts varied considerably: Hydroxychloroquine-treated patients were more severely ill at baseline than those who did not receive hydroxychloroquine (median ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen, 223 vs. 360)
    1
  64. Here is an important sentence from the study: Hydroxychloroquine-treated patients were more severely ill at baseline than those who did not receive hydroxychloroquine (median ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen, 223 vs. 360)
    1
  65. Apples compared to Oranges. Justify the following from within the study" Hydroxychloroquine-treated patients had a lower Pao2:Fio2 at baseline than did patients who did not receive hydroxychloroquine (median, 233 vs. 360 mm Hg).
    1
  66. Plus, it supposed to administered EARLY...not when patients have a saturation of only 94%. The study is doing everything it can wrong.
    1
  67. Hydroxychloroquine should be given to patients EARLY...and in combination with zinc and azithromycin. This study did 0 of this.
    1
  68. Yes, so the study Dr. Campbell is looking at, studied the wrong patients. Further from the study: Hydroxychloroquine-treated patients were more severely ill at baseline than those who did not receive hydroxychloroquine (median ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen, 223 vs. 360)
    1
  69.  @HenryLebensbaumLaw  They tested the wrong patients. I've worked with hundreds of respiratory patients and spent a few hours helping out in our ICU lately where we had one covid-19 positive patient on a ventilator. Waiting to treat patients when their oxygen saturation lowers to 94% with this antiviral is actually stupid. Treatment should be early, and those reporting success are using it in combination with zinc or azithromycin, or both.
    1