Comments by "channel" (@channel1_channel) on "Hydroxychloroquine, evidence of efficacy" video.

  1. Hydroxychloroquine + zinc + azithromycin given EARLY in the outpatient setting. It was never rocket science! But various medical authorities managed to conduct trials that did not give these THREE medications together and EARLY. I regard that they set the studies to fail (given late/no zinc/crazy high loading doses on purpose to spark arrythmias (2400mg!!!)/given to patients with a poorer immune profile....MANY TRICKS to crush trials). They also published that peer reviewed fraud in the Lancet & NEJM out of desperation.
    147
  2. I believe this video was temporarily taken down within hours of upload...but the ban was reversed. The damage has already been done on the HCQ front for western countries via corrupt MSM and big pharma.
    21
  3.  @tammy-lynnstewart5677  Ooh Yaaah....I have no words for how corrupt these bastards are. 1984 style stuff.
    13
  4. I'm pretty sure the Brazil study was aiming to ignite arrhythmias. Trials designed to fail.
    11
  5.  @nvaidyan  A film needs to be made about this whole sorry & corrupt saga. A film that zeros in on the "medical science".
    4
  6.  @kevinyaucheekin1319  Late last night for me (this video did seem to go down!) soon after being loaded. It is now available again (for me).
    4
  7. ​ @janetairlines1351  Criminal big pharma behaviour. They had no reason to give these high HCQ doses unless they intentionally wanted to ignite heart arrhythmias: The Recovery trial used  hydroxychloroquine base (equal to 2400 mg of hydroxychloroquine) in the first 24 hours for treatment of already very ill, hospitalized Covid-19 patients.  The Canadian and Norwegian Solidarity trials used 2,000 mg of HCQ, or  of HCQ base in the first 24 hours.
    3
  8. I work as nurse...that said..many lay people have BEEN ALL OVER THIS putting most of the medical establishment to shame. I knew about HC and zinc weeks before Trump mentioned it in public. Chris Martenson has covered this subject better than ANY medical doctor on this planet (he even designed trials - trials that would work...not ones designed to fail). Del Bigtree (The Highwire with Del Bigtree - weekly show) has been ahead of the curve.
    3
  9.  @extremecowgirl3629  Apparently there is a trial happening in California. That said, I almost guarantee they WON'T use the Borody TRIPLE THERAPY early (Ivermectin/Zinc/doxycycline)
    3
  10.  @virginiahyde1570  Pharma/govt = corrupt!!! Apparently there is a trial happening in California. That said, I almost guarantee they WON'T use the Borody TRIPLE THERAPY early (Ivermectin/Zinc/doxycycline)
    2
  11.  @briancase6180  "C'mon guys, this is settled science" - What is settled science? Show me the study that proves HCQ (no high doses)/zinc/azithromycin (triple therapy) given EARLY in the disease process preferably as outpatients is proven to not work. YOU CAN'T. HCQ + zinc + azithromycin is a triple therapy that should be given as early as possible in the disease process, particularly as outpatients. There should be no 2400mg loading dose go HCQ. The dosage should be much lower. ALL of the large randomised trials failed to perform this SIMPLE trial format, that many within the researching lay public have known about since April. I was aware of HC + zinc vs sars-cov 2 in early February.
    2
  12.  @janetairlines1351  Not quite....but heading in that direction. The dosages are too high according the corrupt WHO's own guidelines. See the Palmer Foundation article titled:
    2
  13. Medical fraud for profits. A film needs to be produced over this insane fraud.
    2
  14. Ivermectin in Triple Therapy (zinc + doxycycline) Apparently there is a trial happening in California. That said, I almost guarantee they WON'T use the Borody TRIPLE THERAPY early (Ivermectin/Zinc/doxycycline)
    2
  15.  @tonebonetones  Designed to fail.
    2
  16. Ivermectin + zinc + doxycycline is also VERY promising as another triple therapy.
    1
  17.  @carlcampbell6827  Yes, political agendas playing out.
    1
  18.  @briancase6180  "until there are proper studies that contradict the current proper studies, the science is settled." - There won't be studies to satisfy you. This was made clear months ago to many people as we observed the blatant design failure of various studies roll in. Many will have quietly said "So this is how it is". Then the Lancet & NEJM journals hammered this home by publishing peer reviewed fraud in order to crush the HCQ quest. Doctors have reported that patients have been reluctant to take HCQ due to the scaremongering over this cheap well known drug. Rest assured many other effective medicines will be prescribed despite their being the rigorous studies you would so desire of HCQ. Like so many others, I desired the HCQ in Triple Therapy but that is clearly never to be. Welcome to medical "science".
    1
  19. ionophore: That action may not necessarily be the ONLY action that is helping. See: https://youtu.be/zfZRIP2q1Bo
    1
  20. This website compiles many studies on hydroxychloroquine vs covid-19: https://c19study.com .Get with the program.
    1
  21.  @peacefuljourney4994  "
    1
  22.  @taniaelliott6625  You think! In one study they selected patients with a poorer immune profile against others with a better immune profile, but used the excuse that those with the better immune profile had other factors that even up the scales (I caught that detail out myself). We had trials where the loading dose was 2400 mg (which is madness and nothing short of an attempt bring on heart arrhythmias). In another trial HCQ was given late and without zinc (you don't give antivirals late). There were further trial issues that have no scientific clinical explanation. This has been a most sickening saga to watch going down after all of these months. Two of the world's most prestigious medical journals (Lancet & NEJM)published complete peer reviewed anti-HCQ fraud. The icing on this shameful cake. Dr Chris Martenson covered the subject very well here. There is much more depth to the detail, but he did a great job of covering the basics. He is clearly exasperated that NO randomised clinical trials were performed when he had laid out what is an OBVIOUS trial design in April: Hydroxychloroquine + zinc + azithromycin given EARLY in the outpatient setting. Here his video timestamped: https://youtu.be/G7TWiweluwA?t=1113
    1
  23. ​ @elviraperla3727  Dr Campbell made a prior video regarding HCQ and that video was an absolute disgrace, as was outlined in the comments at that time by many people who were up on the science and how to actually give HCQ + zinc + azithromycin.
    1
  24.  @carlwilson8859  Azithromycin apparently has some anti-viral attributes too. Also, HCQ may have more activity besides being an ionophore. See this video : https://youtu.be/zfZRIP2q1Bo
    1
  25.  @elviraperla3727  I have been subscribed to Dr Campbell's YT channel a decade or more! Dr Campbell made a very alive video relating to a prior HCQ "trial" over a month ago. When it comes to the "j"....I am not sure what this relates to. I would need to see the primary paper. As most people will know, tablets are typically given in mg doses per day (or multiple times per day for example).
    1
  26. Testing air bags after the car has crashed.
    1
  27. Apparently there is a trial happening in California now. That said, I almost guarantee they WON'T use the Borody TRIPLE THERAPY early (Ivermectin/Zinc/doxycycline)
    1