Comments by "Solid Freakazoid!" (@Freakazoid12345) on "Huge Verdict Against Alex Jones" video.

  1. Except he's not being impartial and has an obvious bias. He's appealing to what will help grow his channel and because of that, has lied about many things in many of his videos. He's typically appealing to the reddit crowd, whose mods are known for abusing children.
    8
  2.  @leanykakicsi6152  which part? If you want an impartial look at things, I like Nate the Lawyer. But this guy knows a bit about law, but what is the point if he leaves out 50% of the information? This channel is for coddling emotional people and pretends to look at both sides, but doesn't.
    7
  3. Can somebody explain to me how much money the parents of school shootings got from those who failed to act or prevented others to act, while being government employees? Nothing, right? Yet this man has an unpopular opinion and gets fined $45 million? Can somebody explain to me how that works?
    5
  4.  @John-tr5hn  "I don't believe you're asking an honest question." See, you can be wrong or lie and I'm not going to expect you to pay me $45 million. Interesting how that works.
    3
  5. Judge was easy on him by fining him $45 million for unpopular opinions? Have the victims families sued anybody for failing to act in the Parkland or Uvalde shootings?
    2
  6.  @TroutBoneless  so you some how came to the wrong conclusion? That's even worse than lying about watching the trial.
    2
  7.  @leanykakicsi6152  I already said he appeals to the reddit crowd, which tend to be the mentally ill, low IQ and child abusers.
    1
  8.  @LeontheSmithy  I can easily list plenty. But you haven't demonstrated you're worth the time.
    1
  9.  @williambeuttel4208  which youtubers do you like? It's really interesting that Legal Eagle did a video with Dr. Mike, who's one of the most reliable sources of medical information, while Legal Eagle has a clear bias towards appealing to the mentally deranged.
    1
  10.  @LeontheSmithy  typical non-answer from somebody supporting child abuse and government corruption.
    1
  11.  @GuidoLuzzi  yeah, this makes no sense unless what Alex Jones actually said was true and this was motivated by the rich elite to shut him up. They just prove his point, if anything. I'd like to believe he's a disinformation agent and this is all for show and would explain why he can talk but people aren't allowed to hold anybody corrupt accountable. Just public theater.
    1
  12. The only people who don't like Alex Jones are those who support child abuse and government corruption. Which seems to be everybody in the comment section.
    1
  13.  @jasonbolding3481  you're telling me not to lie, while lying yourself and calling one of the few people who holds corrupt politicians accountable a liar? This has nothing to do with Sandy Hook and everything to do with government corruption. Have any of the corrupt people he's called out been held accountable for their crimes? But he has an unpopular opinion(as a citizen) and gets fined $45 million? You don't see anything wrong with all of that?
    1
  14.  @jovanleonardi1574  he was right about hydroxy cloriquin. He was right about a lot of things. John Oliver, John Stewart, etc. etc. lie all the time and they go, "but we're entertainers". I guess since they cover up corruption instead of exposing it, they don't have to pay $45 million fines.
    1
  15.  @jovanleonardi1574  "oh and just wait there are trials in like 3 more states too this was 1 state 1 family." So basically kangaroo court.
    1
  16. @Lex Bright Raven I disagree.
    1
  17.  @fluffydragon84  how old are you? Why didn't your parents raise you properly?
    1
  18.  @TroutBoneless  I guarantee the more I watch, the more I'll have examples that prove my points.
    1
  19.  @jordanetherington1922  look up the definition. It should be obvious.
    1
  20. You sentence doesn't make any sense.
    1