Comments by "" (@TheArklyte) on "Analyzing Real Reporter and Captured NATO Vehicles" video.

@samholdsworth420 on Leclerc and Type 10 they are... but Ukraine won't get those. And technically speaking they don't need those. Type 10 is deaigned for mountainous terrain and has very light armor while Leclerc is maintenance heavy and requires to be near french industry.
20
@cd8086 it's not crappy. Morozov, the guy who helped design T-34 and was chief mind behind T-64, never intended tanks of his layout to be used in 2024. He designed a tank that existed in an era when gun stabilisation was rare, laser rangefinder even rarer, thermals were nonexistent, GPS was sci-fi and precision weapons were in their infancy. Swedes faced the same design requirements and created Strv103. However unlike russians they just didn't slap ERA and thermals to it and call it Strv203 and pretend that it's the best tank in the world. T-64 was bleeding edge in 1960's, T-72 was great in 1970's, we're in 2024 ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯ It's a fault of neither designer, nor the vehicle.
16
@RZ-nr7il whom "our", care to specify?
9
@RZ-nr7il which one specifically, comrade?
7
@nirfz whille some aspects of his story are strange, that part is a bit believable as there are many military bases around the world that are "spread out" in their placement and thus have to use parts of civilian infrastructure(especially widespread in regards to artillery shooting ranges or when the base has civilian highway it counts as emergency airfield).
2
@worldoftancraft In 1970's I'd prefer to have T-72 over T-62, which was still in full scale production.
2
@Scott-et4kd month old profiles like you are indeed cringe, bot
2
@AndRei-yc3ti you do realize that reading comprehension is avaluable skill, comrade? Well, I'll give you a benefit of a doubt and ask you to try again. My comment is right there, need help finding it?;)
1