Comments by "" (@TheArklyte) on "Is the Swedish CV90120 the better choice over the American M10 Booker?" video.

  1. Problem with 105mm is that the most potent round it can have is in case you DO run into enemy armor is M900, which is de facto equal to ballistic capabilities of 2A46 of T-72. Except T-72 is more likely to survive the hit... even if russians still haven't learned what is a MRD and why it's important for FCS.
    6
  2.  @levilastun829  I'm not going to open up the whole comment chain to look up what changed in several months, but in case I didn't mention it or you somehow overlooked it: 1)M900 has much longer penetrator. If I was talking on this topic, I likely mentioned that I specifically mean 2A46Msomething on T-72 ie when it was heavily limited to rod length. T-90A has de facto the same gun, but due to reworked autoloader it doesn't have the same problem. Idk why people find it so hard to comprehend something as basic. Okay, I'll give an easy example. Think of it this way, if it'll be easier for you - you can install 100mm D-10 in turret of T-34/76(1942), you will just need massive muzzle break, massive counterweight, you would be limited to using only low pressure ammo, you will need to cut a hole in the back of the turret for recoiling gun breach, you will be able to reload it only from outside because there is no space for human left inside the turret and you will need to pray before each shot. Does it make D-10 a worse gun on T-54 or SU-100? Nope. But we're not talking about T-54 or SU-100. Warning! This is an analogy, an example to explain what I've meant. Please don't derail the conversation into it. 2)MRD stands for muzzle reference device, yes. First ever use by Russia was on T-90M in 2016, almost 3 decades after it became standard for NATO even on old refurbished tanks due to the requirements of increased FCS accuracy.
    1
  3.  @levilastun829   @levilastun829  I'm not going to open up the whole comment chain to look up what changed in several months, but in case I didn't mention it or you somehow overlooked it: 1)M900 has much longer penetrator. If I was talking on this topic, I likely mentioned that I specifically mean 2A46Msomething on T-72 ie when it was heavily limited to rod length. T-90A has de facto the same gun, but due to reworked autoloader it doesn't have the same problem. Idk why people find it so hard to comprehend something as basic. Okay, I'll give an easy example. Think of it this way, if it'll be easier for you - you can install 100mm D-10 in turret of T-34/76(1942), you will just need massive muzzle break, massive counterweight, you would be limited to using only low pressure ammo, you will need to cut a hole in the back of the turret for recoiling gun breach, you will be able to reload it only from outside because there is no space for human left inside the turret and you will need to pray before each shot. Does it make D-10 a worse gun on T-54 or SU-100? Nope. But we're not talking about T-54 or SU-100. Warning! This is an analogy, an example to explain what I've meant. Please don't derail the conversation into it. 2)MRD stands for muzzle reference device, yes. First ever use by Russia was on T-90M in 2016, almost 3 decades after it became standard for NATO even on old refurbished tanks due to the requirements of increased FCS accuracy. Double posting this wall of text since YT will lilely shadowban any comment about weapons at random. Maybe second one will be visible.
    1