Comments by "" (@TheArklyte) on "Why will Poland have the 2nd biggest cruise missile arsenal in NATO?" video.

  1. Another big factor here is that it might be a big enough order to 1)provoke other NATO members into buying it or alternatives to send "someone" a message of staying where they are; 2)spin up the production cycle of the missile which would lead to it becoming cheaper and someone becoming more willing to use it or selling it to states in need.
    9
  2. ​ @HunterMILITARILY  Ukraine was on backfoor for OVER TWO YEARS. It doesn't have nukes, it doesn't have territories, factories and ports outside of range of russian missiles, it doesn't have around 20 million "undesirable" recruits from poorer region that would be thrown into the grinder. But it has been two YEARS when Putin promised two weeks to Odessa. Will Ukraine eventually fall due to inability of current cabinet to sue for peace and lack of international help? Yes. Maybe in a week, maybe in 5 more years. But prorussian appeasement and peace dividend fell over, russian prestige, economy, military image, position in relation to other partners on global stage. It changed and it won't return now. People finally looked at mighty Russia on the map and found out that not only is it's projection onto the map a visual illusion, it's mostly empty and inhospitable. And when looked at actual population and GDP/c with removal of oligarchs, it's not such a big country all of a sudden😅
    8
  3. ​ @Paul-qk3wr  do you see billionaires taking the lead on animal conservation or climate change?😅 Poland knows it's first target if push comes to shove. So it's proactive. And yes, it's bad that bigger wealthier countries rely on others to solve the issues.
    3
  4. Tbh when such big contracts come through, I would hope that buyer at least thinks about buying a share in the company that produces the stuff, thus allowing a small return on investment AND potential licensed production in the future
    1