Comments by "" (@TheArklyte) on "How does M1A2 SEP v3 Abrams compare with its main rival T-90MS?" video.

  1. Cool, hopefully this video will take into account their price, production capabilities of their creators, modernisation potential still left, logistical flexibility, amount of time dedicated to crew training and so on instead of just dropping two tanks against each other in vacuum of space and having nothing to say or worse, being openly biased toward either side. But surely this won't happen! Right? Right?
    25
  2. Alberto Amoruso you're right, picking the worst NATO tank against any T-90 was unfair. Should have been newest variants of Leo2 vs same of T-90. Or just Leclerc vs Armata.
    2
  3. Bill who said that Abrams is anywhere near the best? On the contrary, it might be the WORST NATO tank:P
    2
  4. The Syrian eyes Syria vs Iraq? What century are we talking? But list of winners usually includes UK, USA, France or some other superpower with colonial or necolonial ambitions. The more you murder each other, the more they win:D
    1
  5. +Wet Lettuce IF you decide to use Mig-21's as fighters against those F16's. However as CAS...
    1
  6. Mickey G will it FINALLY switch to modern cannon?
    1
  7. +Mickey G I've meant just switching to L/55 version from L/44 just like all other it users had done a decade ago. So far it seems that Abrams is too overweight already and simply can't handle new gun.
    1
  8. bernardobiritiki Cutting edge? Last NATO tank that still uses L/44 in 2018 is cutting edge?:D
    1
  9. Mickey G yeah, sure, it's not like Abrams is suffering from infantry and all upgrades are aimed there because experience had openly shown that building a tank designed only to fight other tanks and counter "potential next gen soviet tank" was a dumb idea, right? But some people never learn, I guess.
    1
  10. +atomicturist and expensive. You're people are forgetting main competition and opponent of Armata's T-14 - T-90M. It's basically T-90 that had cannibalized T-14 for parts. Cheaper, lighter, lower profile, almost the same offensive and defensive capabilities. This one is the real "Armata killer"... simply because it'll still her budget:D
    1
  11. +It's Justin The man Current Leopard 2 of the week uses L/55. Challenger uses (albeit different) L/55. Leclerc is using L/52 with an autoloader. Abrams uses L/44 in 2018... JUST LIKE ARIETE you have just dismissed! You're literary stuck with equivalent 75mm M3 while all the cool guys around already have switched to 76mm M1, QF 17-pounders, Kwk 42's, D-5's and so on. And you're happy about it:D
    1
  12. +TRIPPLE G 915 then why is T-90 getting a new gun, but "someone" is still sticking with L/44 and not switching to L/55?
    1
  13. +Jack Vony T-90M is receiving T-14's 2А82-1М. Normal T-90 is considered to get 2A82. Where are reports of 2A6M-5 being new? Only source of this misinformation is you monologuing here:D Because it would still significantly use things like range, velocity, precision? You're saying it like an olympic marathon runner would never use civil transportation services.
    1