Comments by "" (@TheArklyte) on "Could the modern Polish military protect the 1939 Poland? (part 2 of the series)" video.

  1. No, because modern polish military comes with modern polish politicians and command stuff, who'd effectively cosplay 1940 french ones. Alongside centuries old polish traditions of settting themselves up for political suicide.
    8
  2. Also known as WWIII. Because Pakistan is chinese ally and indian enemy. As a result you get the same result as Serbia starting WWI. China, Pakistan, PDRK and likely USA on one side with Iran, India and Russia on the other side. And the rest of NATO abstaining to plunge EU into war over USA interests.
    3
  3. No, because modern polish military comes with modern polish politicians and command stuff, who'd effectively cosplay 1940 french ones. Alongside centuries old polish traditions of settting themselves up for political suicide.
    2
  4.  @odst1778  ironically enough, mostly their own soviet tech. Still won't help. People overestimate the impact of new tech that can't be neither supplied, nor replicated.
    1
  5. Germany never fought with quality in WWII. Whole Axis COMBINED couldn't get a tech edge on USSR and UK. When USA too joined Allies it was over. Meanwhile during invasion into USSR the tagteam of Germany, Romania and Hungary outmanned USSR significantly. That's why the whole myth that all soviet officers were killed off comes from despite different years - soviet army grew over 6 times with fresh conscripts in 1940-41 in preparation to possible german agression(and to put a nail into coffin of "prepared to attack Germany first" myth, soviets were in the middle of rearmament which would end only in late 1943). Number of officers remained the same. Meaning that you suddenly got 6 times less trained officers per soldier. Hence the carastrophe of 1941 with lots of soldiers without command and orders.
    1
  6.  @Mario-kf3ej  how is PL-01 doing for you? When was it supposed to be delivered? Good advice on spreading bullshit. FOLLOW IT:\
    1
  7.  @rapapa6697  yes, especially when taxpayers money on the project were succesfully spent. But it was a different government, relax. Not the one ruling this week:\
    1