Comments by "" (@TheArklyte) on "Are Belarus and Russia parting ways?" video.

@SzalonyKucharz Historically MAJORITY of Commonwealth lands came from Grand Duchy of Lithuania, Ruthenia and Samotija. Historical Lithuania. Not modern one as poles claim. Historical Lithuania is made up by territories of modern Belarus, part of Lithuania and a bit of Russia. Samotija is Lithuania and Latvia. Ruthenia is Belarus, Ukraine and part of Russia. The same bullshit is used to claim the majority of Commonwealth was polish by pretending that belarussian and ukranian languages don't exist and counting only population using lithuanian language in MODERN understanding to count as lithuanians. Basically all the same tools of cultural genocide used by russians are also used by poles.
8
@Ake-TL well, that's basically what Poland wants considering how they claim that Commonwealth was only Poland and modern Lithuania and thus all lands outside of modern Lithuanian borders are polish ones:D Thankfully there is still Ukraine that won't stand their bullshit.
7
@zero signal <heh, I found a russian, I guess. One day I'd figure out your obsession with Ukraine:\
5
@SzalonyKucharz 1)I'm saying that in open text; 2)lithuanians would never talk this way. Among our neighbours they're probably the nicest people. And the only one being trustworthy in Eastern Europe. No, I mean including belarussians too. Slavs have a tendency to backstab other slavs for the fun and profit of everyone around. 3)are you suggesting Moskow or saying Moskow? "He who should not be named", [evil laugh]™?
4
@zero signal it's simple - I'm from Belarus(or am I?). But it's okay, you're free to google what we did wrong and edit your previous comment. Send me a note when you're finished;)
3
@SzalonyKucharz you have answered your own sarcastic question about what'll happen to polish language in 200 years. It's just that we have 150 years less left and don't find it as funny as you:D "In your nationalist fervor you seem to have missed the point. And the point was the geopolitics and similarities between Polish, Lithuanian and Belorussian displacement on the Eurasian map, regardless of which ancestor state and region had the bigger dick when they unified politically back in 1569 and whose language was dominant." I'll mention it next time someone demands to give western Belarus "back", ok?
3
@ChillDudelD nice of you to mention Adam Mickiewicz works. Into what language had Dunin-Martienkiewicz translated Dziady? Nonexistant one?:D Poland was never a largest piece of Commonwelath(look at map before unification and at town names after. Famous polish city of Brest Litovsk) no matter how many times poles and russians claimed that belarusian populace in censuses speaked their language by ignoring the difference between modern and historical lithuanian. Neither was this culture and language suddenly appearing out of nowhere. And yes, send my regards to german census from early 20th century too since germans apparently learned to tell slavs apart now. When btw? To all the commenters above, who had already partitioned us between Poland whom "lost it's historical lands" and Russia whom "was robbed of its lands by commies", I say one thing - eat a dick. Or cut the middle man and eat each others dick as much as you want. Border stays where it is unless you want to return more:P
2
You literary regarded Belarus as part of Russia instead of real existing separate independent country in you own War in Baltics video. Why have you suddenly changed your mind? Someone gifted you a map? Or punched in the face?:\
1
@piotrmackowiak9636 then where do all the poles I find on internet come from if they're rare exceptions that shouldn't even exist?
1
@Michal235 I'd prefer not to be either western or eastern world, but belarussian. Seriously, keep UN SC veto "overlords" away from here, be they from London, Moskow, Beijing or Washington. I know it's too much to ask being stuck in the eye of the storm, but it'd be better if you have figured it all out between yourselves without military bases on our territory and nukes aimed at us. Again. P.S.: I would have given France a pass on not being warmongering backstabbing imperialistic pricks out of all 5 of them knowing their history, but am still cautious knowing their history. So it's better to be safe and view all 5 veto members as danger to humanity. Just like any other government that calls itself "hegemon", "superpower", "empire", "local power", "leader of [inserthere]" and some others.
1